I never stopped blogging, was just busy :-)

err I'm not. I said I was posting neo-Marxist arguments to wind someone up. Learn to read.

except that would be something different
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolling_%28fishing%...

I am not sure if another of my comments have been caught in the ether --- nah I'm just lazy :)

Afraid you suspect wrong. I couldnt give a flying fuck about the irritating shortarse little cunt. I am surprised at you using the logic of casual racism though Bob, after all what political wing the shortarse represents is irrelevant to his fiddling. You wouldnt, if he was black, dream of refering to him as a 'fiddling little black shit' so why use the same style of argument when you know full well that being dodgy is not exclusive to any particular political wing - see expenses jail terms for details.

What i am miffed at is the stretching irrelevancy of much of the Observer investigation.

"whataboutism, isn't it?"

Far from it, the point is a bit of perspective for those who call for Cameron to quit or think he might. Blair survived far worse allegations and scandal pressure I'd say.

Good one... Have added

Errr "identity politics" refers to the idea of grouping people based on social groups, e.g. gays/straights etc and the fact that when you go down the route of championing social groups on the matter of discrimination against them you will inevitably end up with those groups having to discriminate in their own favour which is at best a double standard and at worst total hypocrisy.

I was also being sarcastic about heterophobia in the sense that it is OK for a gay person to call a straight person a "breeder" in a pejorative way but it is not OK for a straight person to call a gay person "gay" in a pejorative way. It is an utterly absurd situation, much like the other point I made about racism which tends to be based on "whitey is evil" rather than "attacks on someone because of their skin colour is wrong irrespective of whether they;re white/black/purple or spotted".

This is about consistency of argument and the lack of it when dealing with social groups and the subject of discrimination.

Evidently :-)

oops