"Birther" is a term invented by leftists for the purpose of personal attacks on anyone who gets any traction with public questions on that topic. It lumps all questions into a single category ("they think he wasn't born in Hawaii!!") and moves past the subject without any of the other questions about missing info being brought up. No grades, no school records, no papers, no inquiry on multiple social security numbers, no discussion of whether he became an Indonesian when he was adopted by Soetero, and if so, when he regained his American citizenship, whether he went to Columbia or Harvard on foreign student aid as an Indonesian, what passport he traveled to Pakistan with, etc etc etc. SO MANY QUESTIONS, all dismissed by the accusation of "birther" on the questioner. I cannot recall in my lifetime a more effective Alinskyite propaganda term for personal attack, but of course anything would have worked with the prostrate, boot-licking help of the mainstream media.

If I ask about his grades, am I a "grader"? If I ask about his school papers, am I a "paperer"? THIS IS RIDICULOUS, both that it worked and that nobody on the right is bothering to COMPLAIN about it. A made up term, completely winning the day before any of the questions are even publicly asked. Forget a civil war, the country is lost already. No regard for the truth. Illusions win.

Heard a great radio interview with Laura Ingraham, having Martin and Emilio on together to talk about this film.. a surprising amount of traditionalism and spirituality from that father/son team, nice to hear, and Laura was superb with them... made me decide to see the pic, and this reinforces my intention.. :-)

And losing in Pennsylvania by 20 points in the same election that gave Democrats control of both houses amidst an anti-Bush fervor... well, that doesn't exactly militate against Santorum alone. Lots of good conservatives lost elections in 06 and 08. The battlefield was thoroughly prepped by liberals trashing Bush, and the boy genius Rove never fought back against it. ROVE is why santorum lost by 20 points in his last election. And even so, his Democrat opponent had to sell himself as pro life and so forth. Santorum got flanked.

Mr. Flynn--

Santorum exacted a promise from Specter to move the nominations of SC judges out of committee. We have Roberts AND Alito because Santorum held Specter to his promise. At the time, Toomey was NOT guaranteed to win that primary by any stretch, and if he had, he would have been new and had no chairmanship muscle.. Santorum's support of Specter gave us Roberts and Alito, probably the best contribution to the future of this country that's been made by any Senate republican in the last forty years.

Come on, Mike. You know better than just to say "Santorum supported Specter, ick." You KNOW better.

There are two parties in this thing, Iran-led Shia and Saudi-led Arab Sunni. The others are smaller. Shia and Sunni are destined to mix it up. The Arab league is going after Syria in order to have some sort of check on Iran.

You can tell how serious this is for the Arabs by their failure to include any anti-Israel provisions in this paper. :-)

I hope the super PACS are smarter than the candidates. THey'd better not be running on "I can do a better job with the economy". the left can easily jimmy the numbers and make it look better right before the election.

I'd better see someone saying conservative ideas and principles are better, not just that republicans would be better technocrats.

I have said that the end of the Breitbart shouting video is telling, when a whiny girl is heard to say "what does he mean raping? I never raped anybody?"

And there is the default from the collective to the individual. They want benefits as a collective, "we are the 99%, give us the fair share", etc. But when collective GUILT is proposed, they reflexively retreat into declarative individual innocence. How about some individual responsibility on the POSITIVE side? Get a job, get two jobs, make something of yourself, instead of declaring that because you are a part of a large collective, things are OWED to you. If you want collective booty, you must accept collective responsibility. I am quite sure the rapists and drug dealers do NOT belong to the 1% you are complaining about. Therefore they are part of the 99%, which you have spent the afternoon declaring you ARE, little girl. They are you and you are them. The collective. With collective guilt and collective responsibility to go along with all your collective benefits.

FYI the word SEAL is an acronym. They are not water mammals that eat fish, nor are they intended to represent them. It stands for Sea, Air and Land operators. :-)

Paul would start WW4 in the middle east. His presently expressed views are just a green light to the mad mullahs and all the other Israel haters. And remember, the mullahs have repeatedly said out loud that Israel is the small problem, and "a world without America is not just desirable, it's achievable".

They are out to bring us down. The weak horse. Paul has already communicated to them that we don't become strong until you cross our own borders against us. TOO LATE.

I will vote against Obama, no matter who the candidate is (it won't be Paul), and if we all show up and vote, then we'll get sixty five more congresspersons and perhaps 15 new senators this time (21 of 33 seats up this year are currently democrat) and we can shove whoever is president WAY to the right. Will of the people.

Unity it is. But first, a spirited primary in which we do not pick Romney. :-)