dAnconia_Copper

dAnconia_Copper

67p

257 comments posted · 4 followers · following 0

1 day ago @ Big Government - Arrogant Approach to H... · 0 replies · +6 points

So in addition to betraying the fact that you haven't read any of the language of this proposal, we now know we can add math, logic, and debate to the litany of concepts that have escaped you.

Your transparency is much appreciated

1 day ago @ Big Government - Arrogant Approach to H... · 0 replies · +5 points

Don't trouble "it" with such crazy notions as "truth", "verifiable data", or "logic"

Go with your FEEEEELINGSSSSssss man...

1 day ago @ Big Government - Arrogant Approach to H... · 6 replies · +5 points

Nothing of value to add, eh anon?

Death panels? Fine, you win the argument over semantics. There is nothing in the bill that says "Death panels" explicitly... but there is the creation of a bureaucracy that will make health decisions previously made in the private sector, thus giving a bureaucrat life/death decision making power. You're right on semantics, wrong on substance.

Government takeover? This isn't seriously debated either. If the government wasn't gaining control, it wouldn't be worth their time. You must still be under the illusion there are honorable people crafting this 2700 page mess.

Power grab? A repetition of your previous two words.

Paying for abortions? Yep, that's in there too. If they didn't want that they'd have agreed to Stupak's demands, plain and simple, and put a funding ban on it. They didn't. Remove head from arse, check world around you.

Adds trillions to the deficit? Yep, it's called math. Politicians mostly have failed this course, and it sounds like you did as well. As for the CBO scoring, garbage in-garbage out. It's a technical computer programming phrase. Look it up.

Cut medicare benefits? That's where the funding is coming from for this, so again, logic dictates that money taken from Medicare, and applied elsewhere will reduce the amount of money Medicare is working with.... while adding more people to the already-strained rolls.

How did you learn to type being so clueless to your surroundings, anon?

ps My own best interest is decided by me.

2 days ago @ Big Government - Unconstitutional Proce... · 0 replies · +1 points

Landslide? It was 52%-48%. For a landslide, please see Reagan, Ronald

1 day ago @ Big Journalism - Why Does the Mainstrea... · 0 replies · +3 points

That would force liberals to, you know, like think and stuff, and force them address the issue and not the person. And that would lead to the destruction of what they "stand" for, by the omnipotent hands of logic. Their templates simplify the world for them (since a shot messenger has trouble relaying the message), and allow them to dismiss any dissent.

1 day ago @ Big Journalism - Why Does the Mainstrea... · 0 replies · +2 points

Then they'd have nothing to say...

2 days ago @ Big Journalism - Detroit News Hearts Pu... · 0 replies · +1 points

I hear the Vikings were also a pleasant bunch...

6 days ago @ Big Hollywood - HBO's 'The Pacific': A... · 1 reply · +2 points

Homicide was GREAT television!

6 days ago @ Big Hollywood - HBO's 'The Pacific': A... · 0 replies · +3 points

Can. Not. Wait.

Band of Brothers gave a glimpse into what made the WWII generation the last "Great Generation", and I will forever be humbled by the men of that era. Hopefully the Pacific will be just as well-done, and educational as Band of Brothers was.

1 week ago @ Big Journalism - Free Speech for Me, Bu... · 3 replies · +3 points

I wish them luck getting past #2...