en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/344241 Comments by chi_sam http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.bd2664988112b33ebe7091069cfec28e.8b1&show_article=1#IDComment64758878 I live in the flight path of two large airports and I have never witnessed 'chemtrails'. This is little more than a myth propagated by simple minds. Any intelligent person knows the government uses 'black helicopters' to spray the mind control drugs they employ against us. When they're not using the helicopters in their cattle mutilation raids. Tue, 30 Mar 2010 03:37:25 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.bd2664988112b33ebe7091069cfec28e.8b1&show_article=1#IDComment64758878 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.bd2664988112b33ebe7091069cfec28e.8b1&show_article=1#IDComment64757000 Amused, saddened, alarmed? That's pretty closed-minded. Have you not even considered enlightened? All science is politically driven, or at the very least skewed by popular beliefs. Always has been, always will be. Space does not allow an explanation, but it's no mystery that humans think, act and reason like humans. Now if someone says, for instance, 'The bees are just lying low because they're intimidated by the Africanised bees', then that's a racially motivated statement and you'd be correct in chastising whoever would say such a thing. Tue, 30 Mar 2010 03:20:30 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.bd2664988112b33ebe7091069cfec28e.8b1&show_article=1#IDComment64757000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.bd2664988112b33ebe7091069cfec28e.8b1&show_article=1#IDComment64755920 Love it !!! I nearly peed... Tue, 30 Mar 2010 03:10:54 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.bd2664988112b33ebe7091069cfec28e.8b1&show_article=1#IDComment64755920 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.bd2664988112b33ebe7091069cfec28e.8b1&show_article=1#IDComment64755762 Oh, he's from India. Then it must be true, because 'intelligent scientists' from India are only wrong about such things as glacier melt and polar bears. Personally, I'd have gone with the 'Guy pops popcorn with cell phone' YouTube hoax. Tue, 30 Mar 2010 03:09:19 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.bd2664988112b33ebe7091069cfec28e.8b1&show_article=1#IDComment64755762 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.bd2664988112b33ebe7091069cfec28e.8b1&show_article=1#IDComment64755089 Yeah, that's a great idea. I wonder why they never thought of it. Maybe they don't watch Bill Maher. Ya' think it just may be possible that scientists are considering such obvious culprits? Tue, 30 Mar 2010 03:02:29 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.bd2664988112b33ebe7091069cfec28e.8b1&show_article=1#IDComment64755089 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.bd2664988112b33ebe7091069cfec28e.8b1&show_article=1#IDComment64753297 This ought to be like Mega-Viagra to Bill Maher. Without Bush and dying bees he's had little to talk about lately. Tue, 30 Mar 2010 02:45:48 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.bd2664988112b33ebe7091069cfec28e.8b1&show_article=1#IDComment64753297 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EL11701&show_article=1#IDComment64214550 Talk about comparing apples to bicycles! Pull that crap with someone else. For the record - I think NAMBLA is an abomination and should be shut down and it's contributing members jailed for obscenity. But to equate an ambiguous freedom of speech argument with actually raping a child is not only intellectually dishonest, it's foolish. And, I agree, these animals need to be dealt with harshly. But really? Who is going to make them the 'victim'? Nobody. Absolutely nobody. Not even their attorneys. You're free to make wild, bellicose statements in a public forum. But it doesn't help to make your point, so much as obfuscate and trivialize it. And I find that sort of blather to be harmful to real debate. Ironic how quickly you went from 'I'm sure' to 'who's to say'. Who's to say? Apparently you are, unless challenged. Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:19:27 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EL11701&show_article=1#IDComment64214550 http://biggovernment.com/tgmccotter/2010/03/24/so-this-is-what-change-looks-like/#IDComment63997961 Screw this imbecile. Check out 'The Happy Act' he proposed and decide if he has any credibility. For the record: I am wholeheartedly opposed to ObamaCare, nearly everything this president stands for, and every foolish utterance that has ever come out of Pelosi's or Reid's mouth. That said, it's hard to top The Happy Act for foolishness and fiscal retardation in a time of economic distress. It's shameful that a Republican would craft legislation like that. Doubly so that he represents Michigan and ought to be working on more critical issues. It's representatives like him that have given us the bloated government we are enslaved to. Don't buy the rhetoric. He's not 'one of us'. Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:17:40 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/tgmccotter/2010/03/24/so-this-is-what-change-looks-like/#IDComment63997961 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EL11701&show_article=1#IDComment63941104 I'm wrong. I'm sorry, and I'll take my own advice and stfu. Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:36:53 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EL11701&show_article=1#IDComment63941104 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EL11701&show_article=1#IDComment63930065 There was never any constitutional amendment (ammendent for you stupid people) 'passed' which legalized alcohol sales. I'd tell you the specifics, but I'd be wasting my breath the same as your teachers. If you don't know what you're talking about, stfu... Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:18:58 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EL11701&show_article=1#IDComment63930065 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EL11701&show_article=1#IDComment63891494 Why would the ACLU defend these two? You're sure of it, huh? When has the ACLU defended child rapists? What's that? You can't cite any instances? That's OK. As long as you're sure that's good enough for me. Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:13:51 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EL11701&show_article=1#IDComment63891494 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EKGJRG1&show_article=1#IDComment63709821 Randy Marsh got it right. They are annoying! Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:03:35 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EKGJRG1&show_article=1#IDComment63709821 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EHB3LO0&show_article=1#IDComment62864850 This is the result of a generation that was brought up playing video games where any problem could ultimately be solved by pressing 'reset' or 're-booting'. That's why those terms are bandied about so frequently. Welcome to the real world kids. Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:51:47 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EHB3LO0&show_article=1#IDComment62864850 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.31b20cd995550e68afb2d061a2fce29a.561&show_article=1#IDComment57366939 I should not have to look up IBU in order to read an article. Yet another example of second (3rd?) rate writing/editing typical of on-line (non) stories. Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:34:08 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.31b20cd995550e68afb2d061a2fce29a.561&show_article=1#IDComment57366939 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=TX-PAR-AIP10&show_article=1#IDComment52724365 That's quite a story. Like most journalistic tripe - why bother? Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:45:30 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=TX-PAR-AIP10&show_article=1#IDComment52724365 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9AGKD0O0#IDComment33176178 Hmmm... Must be another one of those 'right-wing' domestic terrorist groups. Hello... Janet? Are you paying attention? Sat, 5 Sep 2009 00:10:44 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9AGKD0O0#IDComment33176178 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98ASR782#IDComment22018694 This is like the old joke about the prostitute that reported a rape 2 weeks later. Asked why she waited so long, she said, 'the check just bounced'. This is BS. Not paying a hooker is not RAPE. It's theft of services, at worst. This overreaching definition, along with many 'date rape' charges dilutes the seriousness of a real crime. Fri, 22 May 2009 00:48:47 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98ASR782#IDComment22018694 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.9ca28ad2530b0d0029e1304762eca18f.511#IDComment16479218 What's not being reported, is that Cook County wants to lessen criminal ramifications for hookers and 'Johns' and impose a one-thousand dollar fine for solicitation. I imagine a Craigslist 'sting' operation costs well over a thousand, whereas if one could get these girls out from hiding and onto the street, the Sheriffs office could rake in a goldmine with sweeps of Manheim Avenue. Many of the Chicago hookers advertise incalls near O'Hare airport that are crappy motels a short distance away, many of which are in Cook County's jurisdiction. It's my belief that this is merely a hypocritical effort to force the girls to leave the sanctity of the hotel rooms and ply their trade either on the street or in the nearby 'bikini' bars, in order that more busts can be made. Follow the money, I always say... Sat, 7 Mar 2009 21:39:00 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.9ca28ad2530b0d0029e1304762eca18f.511#IDComment16479218 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.9ca28ad2530b0d0029e1304762eca18f.511#IDComment16467135 As recently as November, Cook County was promoting a bill to lessen the criminal ramifications for prostitutes and 'Johns' and levy a one-thousand dollar fine. It likely costs well over a thousand to set-up a Craigslist sting, whereas the Cook County Sheriff can nab dozens of 'cash cows' a night on Manheim Road. Just do the math... Sat, 7 Mar 2009 17:47:54 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.9ca28ad2530b0d0029e1304762eca18f.511#IDComment16467135 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.9ca28ad2530b0d0029e1304762eca18f.8c1#IDComment16466163 Anyone who's not a member of the cultural elite would clearly recognize that red, mushroom-head button as a standard 'emergency stop' button. This is so much more than a gaffe. This shows what imbeciles we have in charge of making the most important decisions in the world. And why stupid gimmicks are just that. Sat, 7 Mar 2009 17:39:36 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.9ca28ad2530b0d0029e1304762eca18f.8c1#IDComment16466163