my guess....iran will say it has working nuke

Voters' perceptions of Sarah Palin get shaped generally through the lens of a PopMedia which has proven its intent to keep Palin down to their stereotypes of her. Since people are paying more attention now, as witnessed by growing opposition to Obamagenda, it's likely that more folks will make up their own minds on Palin, regardless of a rabid media.

There's nothing wrong with Palin's "personality", if by personality you mean who she is. If you mean her personality- in how you interpret it, why that bothers you, that's another problem.

Don't "worry" about our 'mayhem'. Americans do just fine working through the issues..I'd be careful with that stoners outlook as well -->"medical substance that projects love, peace, harmony and health is astonishing."

Tell that to the hundreds of thousands of gangbangers who blunt-up prior to drive-bys.

Pot can stand on its own without attributing your mystical qualities to a weed.

Obama: "I'm not going to walk away from the American people."

Reinforcing the movement against him by the American people.

Palin has my conditional support for the presidency, conditional upon her entering the race.

Be wary of some like the next Bush (Jeb) and others who express the 'primary need' of bipartisanship first. The message the anti-obamaists/anti-socialists are sending is Not to 'find mutual ground upon which we can all agree'.

We're in a civil-civil war. The first step in winning is realizing we're in one. Obama is trying to return to a facade of politics as normal, while continuing to push Leftward.

Leave to Palin to state the obvious, such as Obama is an Leftist ideologue. And now she has to state the obvious again. It Would be absurd to not consider a run for the presidency given her popularity among a large swath of the conservative base. And she is a politician with a career. She also happens to be in touch with the current anti-obama movement like no other.

What/who is Obama? What was He when he decided to run for the presidency? He was a guy with a mysterious past, which is still as mysterious as ever except for the continuing clues of his current actions and decision-making. Yep, He's the Leftist organizer he was in private life. His advisers include all manner of commies,socialists, malcontents, miscreants, Leftist ideologues and tax evaders.
------>;Ain't no 'true American' that supports that garbage, period.

The easiest way to describe it is ' not getting charged any more for the internet than anyone else, even if you're online 24/7 wif an ifone shoved up the rump dowloading 1 stolen movie after another in between ripping off musical artists.

What if all this negative speculation "is a complete DUD"? It's not hard to imagine given the transparency of
Techxperts falling all over themselves to be The Sooth Sayer that predicts the iPad outcome

Forget yer various Pet Technologies. Apple is going for the bigger picture here, and drawing it quite well on their own. iPad may very well fail, and Google may be an internet dinosaur in 10-15 years. Who knows?

There IS a huge market out here for simple easy-to-use internet 'appliances' that deliver some basics- news, entertainment, communications, and shopping, without having to learn much of anything about how it works.
It's the overall Concept that will win or lose, not some stagnant version of an IPad frozen in time.

From your 2007 linked article: Not that he denounces the authors' good intentions, LaMalfa said, but still ... "

And That is one of the biggest problems conservatives face, especially in light of the fact the Leftists have no problem whatsoever in denouncing Republican & conservative "good intentions".

I don't see "good intentions" when I see an Obama or Pelosi or Reid or Frank or any on the nannyists who have destroyed California. I see these people intentionally destroying the country as it is, so they can invent something else.

I heard that Keith Olberman is getting replaced by an exotic-fish screen saver.