IntenseDebate - blue31

14 years ago @ Big Government - Occupy Oakland Protest... · 1 reply · +2 points

Occupiers:

They are weak. They are cowards. They need to run in packs.
They need to attack in packs.
They need to intimidate in packs.

They cannot think for themselves. Most cannot articulate what or why they are protesting.
They have no respect. No respect for others. No respect for themselves.

They are hypocrites. Their mouths say "Love." Their actions say "Hate."
They are a Union of disgust. The United Brotherhood of Bottomfeeders.

They have no honour. They have accomplished nothing.
They think they are edgy. Unique. Populist.
They are a mob.

They are weak.

14 years ago @ Big Government - Occupy Oakland Protest... · 0 replies · +2 points

Liberals do not like gays.
Liberals will USE gays.
But liberals do not like gays.

14 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - Krauthammer: Breitbart... · 0 replies · +1 points

Downtrodden? Example please.

14 years ago @ Big Government - In Memoriam: Andrew Br... · 0 replies · +13 points

I hope the moderators leave all the nasty comments up on the board.
That is EXACTLY what Andrew has been trying to expose. Let their words speak for them.

I just wish they had a fraction of Andrew's cojones, and would sign their real names.

14 years ago @ Big Government - In Memoriam: Andrew Br... · 1 reply · +14 points

While you were busy being a dick, he was busy defending your right to be one.

14 years ago @ Big Government - In Memoriam: Andrew Br... · 0 replies · +8 points

Thank you, Andrew. You made a difference.

14 years ago @ Big Government - Obama Admin Hooks Up W... · 0 replies · +4 points

Do you contribute ANYTHING to society besides hate and contempt?
You certainly don't exhibit tolerance or respect.
No matter how you twist and justify it in your head, you are contributing nothing to this discussion.

Please take a step back, a deep breath, and try addressing your point of view with logic and respect for other opinions. You, good sir, can help move this discussion forward instead of dragging it into the gutter.

14 years ago @ Big Government - Busted on Video: Romne... · 0 replies · +5 points

But it looks like the Santorum signs are also on the "non-road side" of the sidewalk .
So you are saying:
A: Santorum's signs are clearly on private property and should be removed.
B: Romney's signs are also on private property, but you presume that Romney had permission.

I'm trying to follow you, but I quit. You win.

*EDITED for typos.

14 years ago @ Big Government - Busted on Video: Romne... · 2 replies · +4 points

As far as I can see from the video, the Romney signs across the street were not removed.

14 years ago @ Big Government - Busted on Video: Romne... · 1 reply · +3 points

Does this mean that I can take that brand new F150 that someone parked across the street from me?
It's been there since yesterday . . .

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with blue31

People I'm following

blue31