beezdotcom
44p24 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
14 weeks ago @ Breitbart.com - Sting: Obama best pers... · 0 replies · 0 points
Thanks, Sting...laughter IS the best medicine.
15 weeks ago @ Big Government - Florida Journalist Spe... · 0 replies · +4 points
16 weeks ago @ Breitbart.com - Muslim team banned aft... · 0 replies · +2 points
17 weeks ago @ Breitbart.com - Muslim team banned aft... · 5 replies · +9 points
25 weeks ago @ WAVY.com - Local youth pastor arr... · 1 reply · +1 points
Just understand: I'm not saying Jack COULDN'T do something like this, because ALL people are sinners, and you can't completely know what someone is capable of. I also agree that you should always do your utmost to avoid placing yourself in any situation where your own weaknesses can prevail - or give anyone the impression that it could.
However, there is a big difference between "acknowledging the possbility", and "expecting this outcome". I place myself in the first category...shame on anyone who has silently been in the second category for any length of time. To see SOME of the posters (not necessarily you), they have been waiting a long time for a big "I TOLD YOU SO" moment.
25 weeks ago @ WAVY.com - Local youth pastor arr... · 1 reply · +1 points
25 weeks ago @ WAVY.com - Local youth pastor arr... · 0 replies · +1 points
7 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - Dear Media Matters: Ke... · 0 replies · +1 points
I very much appreciate your perspective on this. Reasonable Christian conservatives like myself recognize the difference between philosophical arguments about homosexuality, and legal strictures against/for it. (Realize that the nurture or nature arguments about homosexuality don't hold much relevance with me, since society seems to have little problem judging other behaviors that may have genetic roots - but interesting that they all deal with various appetites: sexual, nutritional, chemical, material...)
While I obviously disagree with many of your views, we do seem to share the viewpoint that the overt focus by the left fringe on promoting radically promiscuous agendas helps NOBODY. It's hard to have an elevated discussion on the larger rights questions while those issues are dangling in our faces (pardon the expression).
(We probably diverge on the gay marriage issue, but likely mainly on which way to follow the logic argument. My thoughts are simply "Either we follow the thousands of years of tradition WRT state sanctioning of marriage - or get the state out of the marriage business altogether - which would seem to be the more libertarian approach. Meanwhile, for benefits purposes, we expand the legal definition of a household to include more than just one narrow additional slice of the population.")
14 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - Natalie Portman: From ... · 2 replies · +5 points
14 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - CAIR Seeks HBO Apology... · 0 replies · +2 points
Company