<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/672174</link>
		<description>Comments by arioch2112</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : George Will Handles Christiane Amanpour and Meghan McCain on &#039;This Week&#039; Round Table</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/george-will-handles-christine-amanpour-and-meghan-mccain-on-this-week-round-table/#IDComment106369598</link>
<description>Funny how everything that Megan said as a detriment about O&amp;#039;Donnell can easily apply to Barack Hussein Obama. Funny how that never seems to matter to the morons in Washington. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/george-will-handles-christine-amanpour-and-meghan-mccain-on-this-week-round-table/#IDComment106369598</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : George Will Handles Christiane Amanpour and Meghan McCain on &#039;This Week&#039; Round Table</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/george-will-handles-christine-amanpour-and-meghan-mccain-on-this-week-round-table/#IDComment106369051</link>
<description>Wow, just wow... so much of this clip is English words strung together in search of a sentence or coherent thought. Might I ask exactly what Ms. McCain has done to deserve this level of attention or allowed to be a pundit? Is she a reporter like some on this panel? Former office holder? WHAT HAS SHE DONE besides have a father in politics, and a mediocre one at that, given his &amp;#039;on again, off again&amp;#039; love affair with defending our borders, for instance? Others have said it well here already, Megan is the useful idiot&amp;#039;s useful idiot. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/george-will-handles-christine-amanpour-and-meghan-mccain-on-this-week-round-table/#IDComment106369051</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : O&#039;Keefe: Top Union Official Caught on Tape Discussing Voter Fraud </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/okeefe-top-union-official-caught-on-tape-discussing-voter-fraud/#IDComment106366050</link>
<description>BobSalem: don&amp;#039;t you know that only applies to faked documents used to attack a Republican President?  It&amp;#039;s that whole selective &amp;#039;seriousness of the charge&amp;#039; bull that they like to tout... </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/okeefe-top-union-official-caught-on-tape-discussing-voter-fraud/#IDComment106366050</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Grande Gobierno: Obama Uses Feds to Protect His &#039;Green Jobs&#039; Fantasy</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/chorner/2009/09/28/grande-gobierno-obama-uses-feds-to-protect-his-green-jobs-story/#IDComment36396624</link>
<description>How about a new law: Anyone signing a bill that HASN&amp;#039;T EVEN BEEN FINISHED yet is being voted on should be forced to leave public office, forfeiting all perks, pensions, etc, and never be allowed to &amp;#039;serve the public&amp;#039; again. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/chorner/2009/09/28/grande-gobierno-obama-uses-feds-to-protect-his-green-jobs-story/#IDComment36396624</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Grande Gobierno: Obama Uses Feds to Protect His &#039;Green Jobs&#039; Fantasy</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/chorner/2009/09/28/grande-gobierno-obama-uses-feds-to-protect-his-green-jobs-story/#IDComment36391655</link>
<description>Let&amp;#039;s take a look at solar power in the state of California. From the following article &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/16/science/earth/16solar.html?em&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/16/science/earth/1...&lt;/a&gt;  comes the following comment... &amp;quot;But even with the increases of the last decade, solar power is a pipsqueak among energy sources; it represents about one-quarter of 1 percent of California&amp;rsquo;s total energy capacity, according to the California Energy Commission. Nationally, according to the Energy Information Administration, it represents about 0.02 percent of total capacity, but those federal figures are incomplete: they reflect only centralized facilities, not distributed rooftop installations.&amp;quot;  Ok, keep in mind that a majority of those &amp;#039;distributed rooftop installations&amp;#039; were also done with taxpayer dollars. I remember an ABC Special with ?John Stossel? that interviewed people that have gotten fed money that covered two thirds of the cost of installation and they kept saying &amp;quot;if it weren&amp;#039;t for the fed funds, we couldn&amp;#039;t have afforded it&amp;quot;. That we should all be so lucky...  It all becomes a huge shell game the likes of which we&amp;#039;ve never seen. Also considering that wind doesn&amp;#039;t blow all the time and the sun sets occasionally... Well, if you can&amp;#039;t figure this out, you probably won&amp;#039;t admit that you made a mistake in voting for Obama. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/chorner/2009/09/28/grande-gobierno-obama-uses-feds-to-protect-his-green-jobs-story/#IDComment36391655</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>