<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/728577</link>
		<description>Comments by Youlie11</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : EPA: Greenhouse gases endanger human health</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CEJT501#IDComment46194055</link>
<description>Calling us names implies you can&amp;#039;t win the argument.   If I want some reasonable semblance of evidence and the right to be skeptical, BEFORE you permantently injure our economy, how does that make me a right wing nut job?  What if AGW proves to be flawed or even downright false?  Are you prepared to face the facts:  -  More hard-earned dollars wasted on goverment control that kills our way of life. -  Less money, time, and energy spent on real environmental issues -  Credibility of &amp;quot;science&amp;quot; destroyed -  Debt for our kids and their kids... -  Erosion of American independence in the world -  More expensive products and services -  Distortion of the real dangers facing our world  These things will happen even if AGW has any element of truth.  We are acting like crazed idiots.  That&amp;#039;s no way to solve problems.    And if AGW is false, what a disaster. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Dec 2009 21:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CEJT501#IDComment46194055</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : EPA: Greenhouse gases endanger human health</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CEJT501#IDComment46191747</link>
<description>Yea...  only everyone agreed that SO2 was dangerous, and a republican president signed these laws.... </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Dec 2009 21:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CEJT501#IDComment46191747</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>