Since when do you have to get insurance to exercise your Constitutional right to freely assemble peacefully? And don't think for a minute that the Obama administration didn't influence the city to cancel the Tea Party, possibly with the withholding of Federal funds or some other threat. More of the Obadman administration's censorship, silencing those who disagree with King Hussein.

What do you think would have happened If the founders of our country had listened to or even bothered to hear anything the King of England might have had to say about the original tea party? Well they would not be our founding fathers and we would still be speaking the King's English and paying his taxes.

So why should listen to King Barack Hussein Obama?

Do all those anti-war/anti-soldier protesters, the anti-life (they are not pro-choice) protesters, and those cop-killer lovers protesting in Oakland all had insurance? Come on!

So now you can only protest when you have the proper insurance? Which the government can reject for any group they don't agree with?

Sounds like Communism to me!

Of course a lot that is happening in this country lately sounds like Communism to me.

And if it sounds like a skunk and looks like a skunk and smells like a skunk...

Why does King Hussein think he needs, on our tax dollars, an entourage of 500+ to go to Europe for a summit? Is he going to witness the Resurrection of Christ? That's how many witnesses Christ had at one time to His Resurrection.

No, besides the fact that Christ has already been resurrected, Obama considers himself the messiah, so He wouldn't be going to The Messiah's resurrection party.

Apparently Barack also thinks he is the King of Kings.

Well, his reception before the G12 won't go as badly as did Christ's trip to Jerusalem, which included mocking, beating and crucifixion, before the resurrection.

But it will certainly be a trip Obama won't forget, though he'll probably wish he could!

More censorship from the "Transparency President." Surprise, surprise!

This country is suddenly becoming obsessed with intrusive control by leaders of every aspect of the lives of the people they think they are leading.

No touching in Connecticut schools (this in a state with connect in its name), no dark-colored cars in California, no dust coming off of farms (is that even possible?), no assault (broadly defined) guns, no control of how we run our businesses or use our lands, no calling acts of terrorism, the war on terrorism, or enemy combatants what they are, no no no ad nauseum.

Democrats have the colossal gall to call Republicans the party of no?

For people who call themselves liberals, whatever their party affiliation, these people are sure narrow-minded.

If these politicians keep squeezing we the people, maybe we'll finally burst out and take back our government by the people and for the people.

I hope.

This is laughable. The government that caused the free agency fiasco that has virtually ruined professional sports and left the opening for so many college players to leave college and go to the pros without degrees, now wants to take over college sports too.

if they wouldn't have created the free agency disaster in the first place, our economy would be a lot better off, as would sports.

The government seems to ruin everything that it gets involved in instead of being involved in what they should be involved in, as the Obama administration is wasting no time in demonstrating. Ronald Reagan's words now more than ever are so fitting: "Government is not the solution, government is the problem."

The Obama machine continues at every turn to grow government bigger and bigger. Control over all financial institutions, then other businesses, maybe yours and mine. Our tax money, next how we can or can't use all our money. Requiring youth to "learn to do service," then requiring them to do such service, as was the original intention of the bill concerned. Takeovers of newspapers, including telling them what they can and can't say; next are talk radio (in the works already) and TV including the news. Telling us what we should call things like the war on terror oops sorry overseas contingency operation, then telling us what we can and can't say. What kind of guns we can have then no guns. What color of car we can have, then what make and model. Where we can set our thermostats, then how many blankets we can have.

What's next how many times a day I can flush my toilet? Will I have to call the White House to have the Secretary of Green Energy come and flush it for me?

Can you spell socialist takeover?

Don't presume to say what other people do when you don't know. I force myself to listen to Obama even though he's boring, can hardly talk with a teleprompter, and says mostly either "comprehensive," "contingency," "Bush's failed policies," or "the failed policies of the past". I force myself because I know I need to be informed, and try to be "fair and balanced."

How you can say that with Obama "there is nothing about me." That's all he's about. His policies, his agenda, his constant TV appearances, town hall meetings, radio shows, etc etc ad nauseum. The man is a narcissist.

Which means he clearly does not have the best interests of our country at heart.

Obama is trying to build a socialist dictatorship with you know who as dictator. He is trying to surround himself only with yes men, including the press. He chooses weak people and damaged goods like Timothy Geithner, and leaves the Treasury Department and key cabinet positions empty. This makes the government top heavy, Barack being the top. This also sets up an Obama controlled Treasury.

Barack is clearly trying to ruin the economy as we know it by setting up a socialist economy in which he and his chosen elite will have control over all the money. This is why the drive for 1 world currency, taking control of financial institutions, trying to make contracts subject to his will. Don't think he isn't really in favor of the bill to tax AIG and other financial companies 90% tax on bonuses, and now there is talk of capping the salaries of big execs. Just leave it to Obama and his cronies to decide who that is.

Taxes and programs galore all designed to make us more dependent on big government, mostly meaning Obama himself. Obama is building a government run welfare state, in which the money will stay with the wealthy who support him, and taken from everyone else.

Weakening our military by telling the world (ie terrorists) exactly when he will be pulling our troops out of Iraq, taking away health care benefits for veterans while giving them to illegal immigrants, playing soft with our enemies and emboldening them, talking to hostile and terroristic countries without preconditions, and trying to redefine for us enemy combatants, acts of terrorism, and terrorists.

Can you spell socialist dictatorship?

"I'm more than willing to have 100 "terrorists" in my backyard."

Sure you would, comradeobama.

Of course it doesn't surprise me that with a handle like yours you would say that. Obama's followers seem to have a knack for saying things they don't back up. Wow I wonder where they get that from?

Back up your words. Call or mail and tell the authorities they can put 100 of the Git-no-mo prisoners right in your back yard. Then post the documentation and the names of these terrorists here.

This is something I said would happen in an Obama Presidency, before he even won the Democratic nomination. Christians should be prepared for much worse than this.

Well, I plan to cling to my gun and to my religion.

The gun, they can have when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.

My religion, they can have if they can pry it out of my believing, determined heart.

But they can't.

We must stand up for each others inalienable human rights.

While we still have them.

Okay let's see.

Obama is trying to disarm our pilots, disarm we the people with more gun control, and disarm our military by cutting defense spending when virtually every other area of spending, most of it wasteful, is being increased.

Obama so far has done nothing about Russia buzzing our ships with its jets, trying to put missile bases in Cuba and Venezuela, and still threatening Georgia, irregardless of pulling out. The Chinese threatening our ships? No action taken yet. North Korea continuing to build nuclear arms, and kidnapping two journalists? Ditto. Syria promoting, training and practicing terrorism? How about some nice talks? Iran continuing to support terrorism and arm itself with nuclear warheads? Obama sends a video asking them to play nice; and what will he do about their in-your-face retort and list of demands on America? My guess is nothing. Maybe talks with no preconditions. In other words, nothing.

Obama closes Git-no-mo, sending its terrorists we probably know where to do we definitely know what. He tells us we can't use dirty words like terrorists, enemy combatants and acts of terrorism anymore, because we might offend the people who are trying to kill us.

Does anyone else see a pattern here?

I hope so, because if not, and if we the people don't do something about it, we will be in far more trouble than we are already.