<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/669130</link>
		<description>Comments by Track_A_Crat</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : New Obama plans: \&#039;spend our way out\&#039; of downturn</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46318205</link>
<description>So this &amp;quot;strategy&amp;quot; was so wildly popular and successful when espoused by The Sheriff that Barry has now adopted it himself?    Makes perfect sense.    If you&amp;#039;re a communist. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Dec 2009 23:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46318205</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : New Obama plans: \&#039;spend our way out\&#039; of downturn</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46318025</link>
<description>Heh, love it.  But, yeah, don&amp;#039;t give the statists any more ideas. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Dec 2009 23:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46318025</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : New UN resolution aims at nuclear-free world</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9ATQQRO0#IDComment35795948</link>
<description>And it&amp;#039;s as worthless as it sounds. But in the absence of any concrete achievements, Barry can hold this aloft and proclaim it a success.    How can this still masquerade as a new idea? It&amp;#039;s been around for decades. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9ATQQRO0#IDComment35795948</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>