◄Dave►

◄Dave►

69p

142 comments posted · 16 followers · following 9

5 weeks ago @ RobertRinger.com - Dealing with Slander · 1 reply · +2 points

Agreed, Jim. Gatto's tome is one of the most important books I have ever read. Before reading it, I thought the dumbing down / indoctrination process in public schools was a fairly recent phenomena. Not so. Even though I am almost 70-years-old, it still pisses me off every time I think about how they got me too! I often wonder what my life might have been like, had they taught me how to think, rather than what to think.

Fortunately, the Vietnam War kept me out of college. I enlisted straight out of high school to get the then unavoidable draft over with (and earn the GI Bill) before starting college. Fortunately, while in uniform, I never met a college educated junior officer that had a lick of common sense. Thus, I eschewed college when I got out and I became a thankful autodidact. Instead, I used my GI Bill to pay for flying lessons and a couple hundred hours of flight time for my pilot's license. I have never regretted it. ◄Dave►

15 weeks ago @ RobertRinger.com - Long Live Individualism! · 0 replies · +1 points

Ah... the tortoise would be behind the groundhog, wouldn't he? :) No wonder you remember her birthday, and now by the association I shall always remember yours. I hope you had a good one. ◄Dave►

206 weeks ago @ Ladd Ehlinger Jr., Hyp... - Of Monkeys And Monoliths · 1 reply · +1 points

Well said. The investigation was invigorating at frist; but the whole subject is becoming tedious. Time for a new sport.

206 weeks ago @ Ladd Ehlinger Jr., Hyp... - My IM Interview with P... · 1 reply · +4 points

That was tedious, but revealing. I sure wouldn't want to live in Dan's head.

Question: Why must we try to talk Dan into going to the FBI? All we need do is get them to start an investigation and they will naturally go to him. He says he would welcome that and cooperate.

"If you see something - say something!"

Why couldn't someone with the computer forensics chops to be taken seriously simply do what this guy did: http://tinyurl.com/3bhz3n3 ?

253 weeks ago @ Freedom Watch With The... - This week's guests on ... · 0 replies · +3 points

Judge,

Somehow, my first attempt at posting this ended up on the 7/3 episode??? Forgive me for trying again...

Thank you for this website; I cannot get Fox business channel in my locale. I have now watched all of your archived shows and you have dethroned Beck as my favorite male Fox personality (sorry - it is not your fault that you do not have all of Megan Kelly's assets). ;)

Your impressive guest rosters contain just the sort whose views I want to hear and/or answer the important libertarian oriented questions you pose. I like the fast pace and the way you cut off filibusterers with a new question like a SCOTUS justice; but most endearing is the way you are willing to take on the social conservatives. Many are Constitutionally challenged and just itching to get hold of the levers of coercive government to regulate the moral behavior of sovereign individuals, which is just as unconstitutional as the Progressives trying to regulate our economic or social behavior. Having their hypocrisy illustrated by someone of your stature at Fox, just has to be educating some of those who don't understand our constitutional Republic, and lament judicial rulings of unconstitutionality as "thwarting the will of the majority." Please keep up the good work, and hold ALL PC altruists feet to the fire, whether the "Politically Correct" Left or the "Piously Correct" Right.

A couple of quibbles: Keep your panels small. Too many guests in a segment prevents any of them from fully developing their points. And, please don't succumb to the Fox producers' tendency to implement their "Fair & Balanced" mantra to a fault, by insisting on booking a Progressive spin-meister to counterbalance a worthy conservative or libertarian guest, when a Progressive principal won't take the hot seat. I suspect your viewers would much prefer the time be given to a credible guest with something interesting to contribute, rather than having to listen to a knee-jerk defense of the status quo. E.g., this week I would have liked to hear more of what John Bolton had to contribute and a whole lot less of Nancy Skinner's predictable sputtering. :)

Finally, tell Ailes I suggest he swap you with Hannity. Cavuto shouldn't mind the star power and if you had a nightly show in prime-time of the caliber of these initial ones, you might beat Beck at the prize of unseating O'Reilly from his lofty perch (Beck would already be #1 if he were in prime-time, and I find Hannity downright insufferable without Colmes as a foil.). O'Reilly thinks he is a tough interviewer; but he can't hold a candle to your real "NO spin zone." o.0 At the very least, tell Roger to give you a couple of the weekend rerun slots on Fox News, so those of us who do not get the business channel are not deprived of must-see Liberty TV! ◄Dave►

253 weeks ago @ Freedom Watch With The... - 07/03/2010 Freedom Wat... · 0 replies · +2 points

Judge,

Thank you for this website; I cannot get Fox business channel in my locale. I have now watched all of your archived shows and you have dethroned Beck as my favorite male Fox personality (sorry - it is not your fault that you do not have all of Megan Kelly's assets). ;)

Your impressive guest rosters contain just the sort whose views I want to hear and/or answer the important libertarian oriented questions you pose. I like the fast pace and the way you cut off filibusterers with a new question like a SCOTUS justice; but most endearing is the way you are willing to take on the social conservatives. Many are Constitutionally challenged and just itching to get hold of the levers of coercive government to regulate the moral behavior of sovereign individuals, which is just as unconstitutional as the Progressives trying to regulate our economic or social behavior. Having their hypocrisy illustrated by someone of your stature at Fox, just has to be educating some of those who don't understand our constitutional Republic, and lament judicial rulings of unconstitutionality as "thwarting the will of the majority." Please keep up the good work, and hold ALL PC altruists feet to the fire, whether the "Politically Correct" Left or the "Piously Correct" Right.

A couple of quibbles: Keep your panels small. Too many guests in a segment prevents any of them from fully developing their points. And, please don't succumb to the Fox producers' tendency to implement their "Fair & Balanced" mantra to a fault, by insisting on booking a Progressive spin-meister to counterbalance a worthy conservative or libertarian guest, when a Progressive principal won't take the hot seat. I suspect your viewers would much prefer the time be given to a credible guest with something interesting to contribute, rather than having to listen to a knee-jerk defense of the status quo. E.g., this week I would have liked to hear more of what John Bolton had to contribute and a whole lot less of Nancy Skinner's predictable sputtering. :)

Finally, tell Ailes I suggest he swap you with Hannity. Cavuto shouldn't mind the star power and if you had a nightly show in prime-time of the caliber of these initial ones, you might beat Beck at the prize of unseating O'Reilly from his lofty perch (Beck would already be #1 if he were in prime-time, and I find Hannity downright insufferable without Colmes as a foil.). O'Reilly thinks he is a tough interviewer; but he can't hold a candle to your real "NO spin zone." o.0 At the very least, tell Roger to give you a couple of the weekend rerun slots on Fox News, so those of us who do not get the business channel are not deprived of must-see Liberty TV! ◄Dave►

317 weeks ago @ Glenn Beck - The 912 P... - The 9/12 · 0 replies · +1 points

Well, now they are all showing up at once. Use the link to constitution.org on the bottom one. ◄Dave►