These people are typical, Andrew, which I'm sure you already know.

Somebody will probably take your comments as racist (Lou Dobbs who is anti-ILLEGAL immigration is now anti-Hispanic...hmm), yet this has nothing to do with race and more to do with dealing with immature fools....My college is full of immature fools, from all races, yet still foolish nonetheless. Can't tell you how many times I have heard racist comments from minority professors and students go unchecked, yet people who act like that are merely drowning in their own ignorance. Their ignorance helps the very organization seeking to "help" them. Ignorance typically doesn't go anywhere, fortunately.

Good job for standing your ground.

How stupid can they be? It's called discovery and it will ruin them.

By the way, they are seeking restraining orders as well as (from what I understand) the following:

$500,000 for each employee, and $1 million for ACORN plus attorney's fees plus punitive damages. Breitbart, Giles, and O'Keefe should countersue for libel.

The first line of that article:

"Fox News will finish 2009 as the top-rated cable news network, a perch it has enjoyed for eight years running."

I think I can hear Olbermann shrieking =)

Same thing happened to me in college when my friend and I took a class with a liberal professor and liberal students. Any time I mentioned anything of substance or Fox News, it was like the whole class was going to have a collective heart attack (perhaps Breitbart should start BigIvoryTower). I like your approach, however. These people have no right to hear me defend my views, I don't have the time to talk to ignorance.

Good points. I find it even more hilarious when reading their websites. They'll write stories that are should be written for the NY Times SE, then 90% of their comments will be from people calling out their bias. Newspapers, of course, don't do anything about this.

The most recent article I read where this happened was when the LA Times posted a study done by a professor from UCLA stating that illegal immigration (sorry, "undocumented immigrants") HELPS the economy and we should give amnesty to these people because they will boost our economy. The vast majority of the comments denied this, and lacked the racial tone that one would expect a elitist would charge because the fact of the matter is illegal is illegal.

The Daily Breeze is almost as bad as the LA Times, but the LA Times gets more coverage since it is a bigger newspaper. Newspapers are run by naive college grads who think that their way is the way. They won't learn, but I blame their professors who obviously didn't instill in them the idea of a free market. When LA Times called me to try to get me to renew my subscription I told them that they lost me when they endorsed Obama.

Also, write down advertisers who bow to the will of the left (Advertisers who strip ads from Beck, Fox, etc.) and refuse to use their services. The good thing about the recession is companies are desperate and are willing to listen to its customers.

Everybody wants everything for FREE nowadays.

I was sitting in my college class and literally 90% of the students in my class said it was wrong for universities to charge tuition...huh? It was so pathetic. If there is a service to be provided, then it must be paid for. Nothing is free. Healthcare will be paid through higher taxes and cuts to Medicare.

Here's how the discussion goes:

Should everyone have access to healthcare?
Answer: They already do. Some people may not be able to afford healthcare but it isn't illegal to anybody. Now, not everybody is able to afford a BMW or a Mercedes, but if the market was flooded with BMW's the prices would come down, thus let's flood the market with healthcare. First of all, let people buy the same plans the Senators, the President, and Representatives are on. That would open up the market. How about incentives for new business' to open up? Sound good? I believe so.

I have no problem with people profiting from healthcare. People also profit off dead people. You wanna bury or cremate your relative? Pay for it. Should we nationalize burials and cemetery services too? We profit off selling cute little puppies as well. Should we nationalize that?

Plus, even with socialized healthcare PEOPLE ARE STILL PROFITING. Those people? POLITICIANS.

Celebs, stick to acting or whatever it is that you do. I don't want to hear your opinions, not because I don't share them, but because you can't articulate well without throwing temper tantrums at those damn racist tea-partiers. Oh, and because your policies have been proven to fail many, many times.

Umm...what's even funnier is the fact that Sarah Jessica Parker is, what, in her 40s? Thus her aunt is probably at least 20 years older than that, so let's say 60s. Let's say she qualifies for Medicare or maybe even has it. Now we know that healthcare will be provided by raising taxes and cutting Medicare, thus her care may be cut by being on Medicare. Plus, she is older and not a priority as far as medicine goes (since rationing DOES occur) thus she may experience mediocre care that way.

I agree with you. SJP can fork up her own money to pay for it. Better yet, how about EVERYBODY who voted for or thought the stimulus was a good idea can pay for that too.

Imagine the horror of the libtard reading this only to find it's not true...oh well, run it anyway!

By the way, by dismissing Obama's behavior as "something that Bush did," is the left admitting that the Messiah has traits of the Bush era? I thought Bush was brainless and clueless?