<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1179168</link>
		<description>Comments by TeaForCowards</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : What the Republican Pledge Needs: A Few More First Principles </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tmoore/2010/10/02/what-the-republican-pledge-needs-a-few-more-first-principles/#IDComment102128765</link>
<description>Doesn&amp;#039;t being so completely full of shit give you a headache? Your heroes were in power for 20 of 28 years between 1980 and 2008. Are you telling me that all the horrible problems that none of you seem able to describe in any detail (other than delusions of &amp;#039;tyranny&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;communism&amp;#039;) have happened in the last two years?  Keep using quotes from people you don&amp;#039;t begin to understand. It won&amp;#039;t change a thing (especially since the good ol&amp;#039; GOP has co-opted your &amp;#039;movement&amp;#039;), but I guess it will make you feel better. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Oct 2010 18:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tmoore/2010/10/02/what-the-republican-pledge-needs-a-few-more-first-principles/#IDComment102128765</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : What the Republican Pledge Needs: A Few More First Principles </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tmoore/2010/10/02/what-the-republican-pledge-needs-a-few-more-first-principles/#IDComment102123920</link>
<description>Yes. I&amp;#039;m sure a Republican House (the absolute best you can hope for on Nov. 2, thanks to your &amp;#039;movement&amp;#039;s&amp;#039; choice of Senate candidates in Delaware and Nevada) will turn the whole world upside down. Either that, or it will pass a few bills that pander to victimized cowards like yourself -- which it knows have zero chance of becoming law -- and accomplish little else in two years. No &amp;#039;Pledge to America,&amp;#039; no repeal of health care -- nothing. Then, in two years, Any GOP gains get swept away in an even bigger landslide than 2008. But that will give you even more to wail about with your fellow cowards.  So congratulations! </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Oct 2010 17:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tmoore/2010/10/02/what-the-republican-pledge-needs-a-few-more-first-principles/#IDComment102123920</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : What the Republican Pledge Needs: A Few More First Principles </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tmoore/2010/10/02/what-the-republican-pledge-needs-a-few-more-first-principles/#IDComment102122864</link>
<description>I know. It&amp;#039;s not you Patriots whose entire worldview is victimization (by minorities, women, gays, people who don&amp;#039;t believe in an invisible superhero, the media, anyone who doesn&amp;#039;t agree with everything you believe, anyone who doesn&amp;#039;t think Sarah Palin is super-hot and really, really smart).  Oh, that&amp;#039;s right. That&amp;#039;&amp;#039;s exactly the Teabag world view. And, no, I didn&amp;#039;t &amp;#039;watch that rally.&amp;#039; If you did, your life is even sadder than it appears on this board.  Poor you. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Oct 2010 17:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tmoore/2010/10/02/what-the-republican-pledge-needs-a-few-more-first-principles/#IDComment102122864</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : What the Republican Pledge Needs: A Few More First Principles </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tmoore/2010/10/02/what-the-republican-pledge-needs-a-few-more-first-principles/#IDComment102121834</link>
<description>Boy. It certainly doesn&amp;#039;t take long to get to masturbation and/or sodomy with you people, does it? Wonder why that is.  Yeah, &amp;#039;failed miserably in every form.&amp;#039; Did you even know you got a tax break, genius, or are you too obsessed with the tyranny of living under a black president to look at your pay stub. (Of course, I&amp;#039;m assuming that you actually work for a living, and aren&amp;#039;t subsisting on government subsidy like so many of you Patriots).  Another cowardly traitor. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Oct 2010 17:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tmoore/2010/10/02/what-the-republican-pledge-needs-a-few-more-first-principles/#IDComment102121834</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : What the Republican Pledge Needs: A Few More First Principles </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tmoore/2010/10/02/what-the-republican-pledge-needs-a-few-more-first-principles/#IDComment102039318</link>
<description>Um, sorry. I don&amp;#039;t understand your comment. Maybe because I don&amp;#039;t speak Whiny Traitor. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Oct 2010 01:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tmoore/2010/10/02/what-the-republican-pledge-needs-a-few-more-first-principles/#IDComment102039318</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : What the Republican Pledge Needs: A Few More First Principles </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tmoore/2010/10/02/what-the-republican-pledge-needs-a-few-more-first-principles/#IDComment102038966</link>
<description>Oh, you mean the one where everyone wasn&amp;#039;t whining about how terrible it is to have a black president? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Oct 2010 01:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tmoore/2010/10/02/what-the-republican-pledge-needs-a-few-more-first-principles/#IDComment102038966</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : What the Republican Pledge Needs: A Few More First Principles </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tmoore/2010/10/02/what-the-republican-pledge-needs-a-few-more-first-principles/#IDComment102038871</link>
<description>Ah, another internet tough guy. Go back to crying about how terrible living in America is, traitor. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Oct 2010 01:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tmoore/2010/10/02/what-the-republican-pledge-needs-a-few-more-first-principles/#IDComment102038871</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : What the Republican Pledge Needs: A Few More First Principles </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tmoore/2010/10/02/what-the-republican-pledge-needs-a-few-more-first-principles/#IDComment102038544</link>
<description>Wow! Your party (and you are Republicans, whatever you want to call yourselves) might pick up some seats! Just like in every other mid-term election ever! That&amp;#039;s a real revolution! But if you&amp;#039;re in the majority in one or both houses, who will you blame for every problem in your pathetic excuse for a life? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Oct 2010 01:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tmoore/2010/10/02/what-the-republican-pledge-needs-a-few-more-first-principles/#IDComment102038544</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : What the Republican Pledge Needs: A Few More First Principles </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tmoore/2010/10/02/what-the-republican-pledge-needs-a-few-more-first-principles/#IDComment101969133</link>
<description>And good job completely ignoring Teabag Hero James O&amp;#039;Keefe&amp;#039;s perverse attempt at something or other! How come you&amp;#039;re not all braying about what a Patriot he is now? Even Breitbart has cut him loose, it seems ... </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Oct 2010 15:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tmoore/2010/10/02/what-the-republican-pledge-needs-a-few-more-first-principles/#IDComment101969133</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : What the Republican Pledge Needs: A Few More First Principles </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tmoore/2010/10/02/what-the-republican-pledge-needs-a-few-more-first-principles/#IDComment101969036</link>
<description>Balancing the budget while cutting revenues AND failing to reduce spending in any significant way! Great stuff! Ignore the realities of math, just like you ignore every other inconvenient reality! Hope you geniuses enjoyed your big primary day! Or, as political scientists will remember it, the high-water mark of a long-forgotten mini-movement! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Oct 2010 15:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tmoore/2010/10/02/what-the-republican-pledge-needs-a-few-more-first-principles/#IDComment101969036</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : The 2010 Election: Turning Point or Point of No Return?</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/oftheeising/2010/09/30/the-2010-election-turning-point-or-point-of-no-return/#IDComment101742469</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Our plight.&amp;quot; I assume you&amp;#039;ve signed a document rescinding your claim to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, police protection and highway maintenance? Poor you. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Oct 2010 03:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/oftheeising/2010/09/30/the-2010-election-turning-point-or-point-of-no-return/#IDComment101742469</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : The 2010 Election: Turning Point or Point of No Return?</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/oftheeising/2010/09/30/the-2010-election-turning-point-or-point-of-no-return/#IDComment101742319</link>
<description>Yeah! Everybody but you is a jerk! You tell &amp;#039;em! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Oct 2010 03:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/oftheeising/2010/09/30/the-2010-election-turning-point-or-point-of-no-return/#IDComment101742319</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : The 2010 Election: Turning Point or Point of No Return?</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/oftheeising/2010/09/30/the-2010-election-turning-point-or-point-of-no-return/#IDComment101740955</link>
<description>With quality candidates like Carl Paladino, Christine O&amp;#039;Donnell  and Sharron Angle, how can the movement possibly lose? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Oct 2010 03:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/oftheeising/2010/09/30/the-2010-election-turning-point-or-point-of-no-return/#IDComment101740955</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : The 2010 Election: Turning Point or Point of No Return?</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/oftheeising/2010/09/30/the-2010-election-turning-point-or-point-of-no-return/#IDComment101740682</link>
<description>How come no James O&amp;#039;Keefe coverage lately? Isn&amp;#039;t he still the brave young standard-bearer for Right-minded Patriots everywhere?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://siu.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/29/our-documentary-takes-a-strange-detour/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://siu.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/29/our-documenta...&lt;/a&gt;  Come on -- this must be some sort of liberal plot, no? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Oct 2010 03:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/oftheeising/2010/09/30/the-2010-election-turning-point-or-point-of-no-return/#IDComment101740682</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Breitbart Didn&#039;t Hide Sherrod&#039;s Redemption and Other Things the Media&#039;s Gotten Wrong So Far</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/gbenson/2010/07/21/breitbart-didnt-hide-sherrods-redemption-and-other-things-the-medias-gotten-wrong-so-far/#IDComment88056927</link>
<description>HAHAHAHAHA! Two responses to my comments and TWO &amp;#039;kool-aid&amp;#039; references! You am funny and clever! You should try harder to work in references to Obama and his liberal storm troopers shoving things -- health care, financial reform or whatever else you fantasize about -- up or down your various orifices though. Because that&amp;#039;s even funnier! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/gbenson/2010/07/21/breitbart-didnt-hide-sherrods-redemption-and-other-things-the-medias-gotten-wrong-so-far/#IDComment88056927</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Breitbart Didn&#039;t Hide Sherrod&#039;s Redemption and Other Things the Media&#039;s Gotten Wrong So Far</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/gbenson/2010/07/21/breitbart-didnt-hide-sherrods-redemption-and-other-things-the-medias-gotten-wrong-so-far/#IDComment87981488</link>
<description>Yeah! How dare anyone admit that Breitbart is a bare-faced liar who twisted a story to get serial masturbators like MrGJG all excited about the possibility of catching one of them coloreds saying something racist? It&amp;#039;s not about the truth -- it&amp;#039;s about what craven losers WANT to be the truth! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/gbenson/2010/07/21/breitbart-didnt-hide-sherrods-redemption-and-other-things-the-medias-gotten-wrong-so-far/#IDComment87981488</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Breitbart Didn&#039;t Hide Sherrod&#039;s Redemption and Other Things the Media&#039;s Gotten Wrong So Far</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/gbenson/2010/07/21/breitbart-didnt-hide-sherrods-redemption-and-other-things-the-medias-gotten-wrong-so-far/#IDComment87981233</link>
<description>Clap. Clap. Clap. And I&amp;#039;m not being sarcastic. If only there were more of you in this, well, whatever you want to call it. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/gbenson/2010/07/21/breitbart-didnt-hide-sherrods-redemption-and-other-things-the-medias-gotten-wrong-so-far/#IDComment87981233</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Breitbart to CNN&#039;s King:  It&#039;s Not About Shirley Sherrod It&#039;s About NAACP Attacking Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment87973897</link>
<description>There&amp;#039;s really not much to &amp;#039;debate.&amp;#039; Your hero posted a video edited to advance the sort of racist world-view to which you and many of his followers adhere, then claimed that he only posted the edited video because he has no concept of responsible journalism. You guys are doing great. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment87973897</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Breitbart to CNN&#039;s King:  It&#039;s Not About Shirley Sherrod It&#039;s About NAACP Attacking Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment87973528</link>
<description>Great point! I can&amp;#039;t believe anybody would ever suggest that people like you could possibly be racist, sexist or homophobic assholes! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment87973528</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Breitbart to CNN&#039;s King:  It&#039;s Not About Shirley Sherrod It&#039;s About NAACP Attacking Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment87973238</link>
<description>Yes. Jeremiah Wright&amp;#039;s existence justifies every craven, black-o-phobic pants-crapper on this and every other teabag-oriented board. You all must be very proud of yourselves. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment87973238</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>