<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/3831110</link>
		<description>Comments by Superluccix</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : NY Giants Win Super Bowl</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/ny-giants-win-super-bowl/#IDComment285205767</link>
<description>Im a Dallas Cowboy fan, so it was hard rooting for the Giants, since they beat us, but I am glad to see the Patriots Lost. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/ny-giants-win-super-bowl/#IDComment285205767</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : DNC Chair Wasserman-Schultz In Full Squirm Mode On Fox News Sunday</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/dnc-chair-wasserman-schultz-in-full-squirm-mode-on-fox-news-sunday/#IDComment259205399</link>
<description>This is the dumbest bitch of the Democrat Party I swear.  So when the President gives money to a company and then that company fails, he doesnt take any blame at all? Are you serious?  I could use the exact same logic against her for everything the Democrats hated about Bush.  Example: It wasnt Bush&amp;#039;s fault for anything bad that happened during the war, it was the Generals fault )The CEO&amp;quot;s in this case) who simply failed in what they were supposed to do.   All her argument is trying to shift blame from the top dog even though he was the one who authorized it.   Such a Disgrace </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jan 2012 05:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/dnc-chair-wasserman-schultz-in-full-squirm-mode-on-fox-news-sunday/#IDComment259205399</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Krauthammer: Newt&#039;s Attack On Romney &#039;What You&#039;d Expect From A Socialist&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-newts-attack-on-romney-what-youd-expect-from-socialist/#IDComment236779006</link>
<description>Oh no! So you mean that after everybody ganged up on Newt, after he has been attempting to praise all of them, that he actually fought back for once?  Such a shame! /sarc </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 07:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-newts-attack-on-romney-what-youd-expect-from-socialist/#IDComment236779006</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Krauthammer: Newt&#039;s Attack On Romney &#039;What You&#039;d Expect From A Socialist&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-newts-attack-on-romney-what-youd-expect-from-socialist/#IDComment236682147</link>
<description>I think Ill just tune into Krauthammer when he is hammering the left, since he sure as hell can&amp;#039;t wait to destroy our own </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 02:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-newts-attack-on-romney-what-youd-expect-from-socialist/#IDComment236682147</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Perry: Obama Is Problem In Middle East, Not Newt</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/perry-obama-is-problem-in-middle-east-not-newt/#IDComment236035255</link>
<description>Its a shame that he didnt start out this way during the first debates, he might actually have had a decent chance.  But after Perry&amp;#039;s video that has over 250k dislikes. I mean I understand that there are more people that dont use the Internet like the elderly who wont bother to see that, but when you get over 250k dislikes on your video, it looks like you have totally screwed your campaign over with that ad.  I mean that ad is something that is going to haunt him after this election, I have no idea what his career will be like after this.  Damn shame, Perry was a good man. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 19:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/perry-obama-is-problem-in-middle-east-not-newt/#IDComment236035255</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : 2000 Pound Bomb Dropped On Taliban </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/2000-pound-bomb-dropped-on-taliban/#IDComment234674931</link>
<description>Man, I wish I could actually see the Taliban in the video.   But alas, if they did actually get them, then awesomesauce. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Dec 2011 14:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/2000-pound-bomb-dropped-on-taliban/#IDComment234674931</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt Flashback 2003: I&#039;m An Eisenhower Republican, Government Has To Lead On Healthcare</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233756175</link>
<description>Yep your the real American. I&amp;#039;ve heard this line plenty of times.  See, in practically every one of your responses, I can easily just fling it right back at you, because those insults just are too general for anybody to keep for themselves.  I can tell you to shut up all I want, and you can&amp;#039;t do a dang thing about it. Just like you don&amp;#039;t have to listen to me, because this is a site. Neither of us win here, I was merely offering you a suggestion.  I will not reply further to you for this particular message </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Dec 2011 17:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233756175</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt Flashback 2003: I&#039;m An Eisenhower Republican, Government Has To Lead On Healthcare</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233741452</link>
<description>I laugh at this non existent threat.  There is a reason why most of us here on Breitbart don&amp;#039;t take Alex Jones types seriously. And you actually ask a question as to why I don&amp;#039;t believe you? Surely you already knew the answer.  Please, keep insulting me more, you&amp;#039;re totally convincing me and the others here.  Like I said, when that time comes, then you can laugh about it, but until then, I suggest you keep those little thoughts to yourself.  WHen that time comes, sure, you bet on it. But until then, please, just shut up, I couldn&amp;#039;t care less </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Dec 2011 16:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233741452</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt Flashback 2003: I&#039;m An Eisenhower Republican, Government Has To Lead On Healthcare</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233378609</link>
<description>The tax code doesnt get fixed up? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Dec 2011 02:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233378609</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt Flashback 2003: I&#039;m An Eisenhower Republican, Government Has To Lead On Healthcare</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233378426</link>
<description>I dont think my children will be affected by these random things that only occur to you and a few others.  But seriously, when the NWO takes over, then you, or your children, or your grandchildren can get back to my children. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Dec 2011 01:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233378426</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt Flashback 2003: I&#039;m An Eisenhower Republican, Government Has To Lead On Healthcare</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233241652</link>
<description>I dont think we are there for Israel. We are doing it for our safety </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Dec 2011 20:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233241652</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt Flashback 2003: I&#039;m An Eisenhower Republican, Government Has To Lead On Healthcare</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233241447</link>
<description>When the world comes to an end from a 1 world government, then I will </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Dec 2011 20:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233241447</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt Flashback 2003: I&#039;m An Eisenhower Republican, Government Has To Lead On Healthcare</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233199183</link>
<description>Does Gingrich support a mandate now? No?   Then who gives a damn about this video.  Yes it would be nice if the man was consistent. But consistency alone doesnt make one great.  If you advocate that 2+2=5 consistently, then you&amp;#039;re wrong.  At least Gingrich admitted his mistake and has moved on, now he doesn&amp;#039;t have that fault anymore.  This is the whole point of evolving as a person. Newt has always been a thinking man. And generally adapts to new positions when he realizes they were wrong, thats how rationale people act. They correct themselves.  I dont give a damn about the mans past as far as morals go, morals wont save this country, cold hard facts and logic will.  Gingrich can deliver those in an ungodly beatdown style to Obama </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233199183</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt Flashback 2003: I&#039;m An Eisenhower Republican, Government Has To Lead On Healthcare</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233192425</link>
<description>Thats an option.  Even Israel has said they dont need our troops there, not sure if we have any there, but I dont know what they said about our money.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233192425</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt Flashback 2003: I&#039;m An Eisenhower Republican, Government Has To Lead On Healthcare</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233192201</link>
<description>How can he only grow government?  Reducing are taxes certainly isnt growing it.  Getting rid of Obamacare certainly isnt growing it.  ANd I dont want a reply saying Patriot Act </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233192201</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt Flashback 2003: I&#039;m An Eisenhower Republican, Government Has To Lead On Healthcare</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233191853</link>
<description>Political Connections means nothing to me.  And no, I dont believe in this whole CFR trying to control the world thing </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233191853</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt Flashback 2003: I&#039;m An Eisenhower Republican, Government Has To Lead On Healthcare</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233191604</link>
<description>Please tell me how Gingrich is currently going to increase the size of government? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment233191604</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt Flashback 2003: I&#039;m An Eisenhower Republican, Government Has To Lead On Healthcare</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment232979070</link>
<description>I still trust Newt. He knows how to balance a budget.  He wont do the mandate, we know this.  He will replace the EPA with an ESA. Which is probably going to be better than the EPA, though it sounds like it might just be a new name. I wish he would abolish it but whatever.  Welfare reform, again, so thats a plus.  Knows more about foreign policy than any of our candidates.  Wont support Cap and Trade, Good.  WILL LOWER OUR TAXES!  Will eviscerate Obama in a debate.  Yeah, Im voting for him </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Dec 2011 08:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-2003-im-an-eisenhower-republican-government-has-to-lead-on-healthcare/#IDComment232979070</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : House Passes Bill To End Taxpayer Financing Of Presidential Campaigns</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/house-passes-bill-to-end-taxpayer-financing-of-presidential-campaigns/#IDComment232407010</link>
<description>What part of on tax payers dime do you not understand?  Why the hell should unions be able to bargain on the tax payers dime? If you dont like your job, then quit and go somewhere else, like int he private sector </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Dec 2011 02:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/house-passes-bill-to-end-taxpayer-financing-of-presidential-campaigns/#IDComment232407010</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : More Than 90 Seconds: Ron Paul Has His Say</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/more-than-90-seconds-ron-paul-has-his-say/#IDComment226929096</link>
<description>I thought something doesnt violate the 10th amendment if its ratified by the states? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 01:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/more-than-90-seconds-ron-paul-has-his-say/#IDComment226929096</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>