SumTingWong
91p1,029 comments posted · 1 followers · following 0
13 years ago @ KATU - Portland, OR - Supreme Court tosses F... · 1 reply · +6 points
13 years ago @ KATU - Portland, OR - Supreme Court tosses F... · 1 reply · +1 points
Kind of like buying a condom after you find out your girlfriend is pregnant, isn't it?
13 years ago @ KATU - Portland, OR - House committee holds ... · 2 replies · -11 points
13 years ago @ KATU - Portland, OR - Heads up everyone - th... · 0 replies · +1 points
I don't care if the charges are ultimately dropped. The cops can't charge you with it if it isn't "illegal" in some rule/ordinance/statuate somewhere (and everyone keeps harping on the Oregon STATE statuates but ignore that the guy I'm talking about was charged for violating a CITY ordinance) and the "charge" would never survive the first court appearance if it were, in fact, a bogus violation.
And EVERYONE seems to want to ignore my main point .... selective enforcement of a questionable ordinance based on an "unpopular" viewpoint. So much for equal treatment under the law.
13 years ago @ KATU - Portland, OR - Heads up everyone - th... · 0 replies · +4 points
Airports may fall under a different jurisdiction and the PofP my be a "region ... with it's own set of rules" but if the location of the alleged offense had any bearing on the charges you would expect the court used to reflect that. Ports (including ship/rail/air) are under the purview of Homeland Security and/or TSA, which are federal agencies. Any breaking of those rules would be a federal offense and would be tried in a federal court. Brennan last appeared in a Multnomah County Court charged with violating a city of Portland ordinance.
"Brennan is charged with "indecent exposure," a Portland city ordinance that says it's unlawful for "any person to expose his or her genitalia while in a public place or place visible from a public place, if the public place is open and available to persons of the opposite sex." State law allows nudity -- as long as it isn't done to sexually arouse oneself or others." (from an Oregonian article here: http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2012... )
The point I was trying to make remains. Selective application of a questionable ordinance. So much for equal treatment under the law.
13 years ago @ KATU - Portland, OR - Heads up everyone - th... · 1 reply · +2 points
13 years ago @ KATU - Portland, OR - Heads up everyone - th... · 3 replies · -2 points
The guy from the airport WILL have legal expenses. You claim being naked is a protected free speech. Why don't YOU back up your words and go fund that guys legal bills?
13 years ago @ KATU - Portland, OR - Heads up everyone - th... · 3 replies · +4 points
13 years ago @ KATU - Portland, OR - Heads up everyone - th... · 7 replies · -8 points
13 years ago @ KATU - Portland, OR - Heads up everyone - th... · 5 replies · +5 points