I love that Breitbart posted this. And no, these questions are evidence of a scam. This is not a debate, it's a live presidential hijacking, with a predetermined outcome: to marginalize Ron Paul. The first five minutes segment of the video above shows Brian Williams struggling to position the non-Ron-Paul candidates as the "winners", while attempting to marginalize Paul with the hypothetical question of what he might do after the campaign is over - in other word, "I don't want you to win, so I'll pretend you can't and position my questions accordingly." So - is Ron Paul "electable"? Of course he is, he's a registered candidate, he's met the legal criteria to enter, he's on the ballot in every state, and he raises money like an ATM. Of course he's electable. The only people now who suggest he is not "electable" are really saying "I don't like his policies but don't have the guts or the brains to address them directly."

What a joke. Of course it was a plant. If Gibbs had simply asked the entire corp during the conference 'does anyone have a question from among the Iranian people', or publicly encouraged such interaction, that would' ve been find, and interesting. But don't lie and say this isn't a plant. What else are you lying about?

As for Ron Paul running away from Cohen after Cohen dropped his pants - the notion that Paul ran because he might be a "an old man" is partially true - but not because his concepts are outdated, hardly. Ron Paul is old enough to remember when a presidential candidate named Bobby Kennedy was approached by a strange guy in a hotel who began acting erratically and then shot him in the head and left him on the floor to die. Or when another presidential candidate was shot and paralyzed for life. Or when other candidates have been physically attacked. So Ron Paul encounters a random stranger who exhibits unusual interest in him, and then proceeds to act in a such a way that any reasonable person interprets as unstable - Paul would be a fool to stay, under the circumstances, and legal charges of "criminal assault" could apply here - "assault" does not require the perpetrator to physically contact the victim, but to simply act in a way that the victim perceives as threatening, and I think its reasonable to assume that any person old enough to remember RFK and others who suffered a similar fate would interpret erratic behavior like Cohen's exhibited toward a presidential candidate like Paul - as threatening. Cohen should be locked up before somebody someday doesn't understand his intentions and beats the living s#@$ out of him.

> "Cohen is not a political puppet aiming to shame anyone."

Of course he is. Each of Cohen's targets has been either right wing (Gingrich, Barr) and/or critical of Israel and/or Israel's Likud party and their foreign policy in the Palestinian territory (Paul, Chomsky, Nader, Buchanan, Trump, etc.).

Cohen's agent in Hollywood is Ari Emanuel. Ari's brother is Rahm Emanuel. Rahm is the new Chief of Staff in the White House, who once left political responsibilities in America to go to Israel and support the IDF in a military action as a contractor in the war zone supporting supply efforts.

I think they should also issue fines for people who live in their own houses. How dare they.