gdp's Comments

Breitbart.com : Attorney: Woods\' wife asked neighbors to call 911

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 20:33:30 +0000

COME ON MAN, Why would anyone care about this story??? Isnt Tiger allowed a personal life? Shouldnt this be between Tiger and his wife? Why does the world have to get involved in this? Is he an elected offical held up to higher moral standards? NO, he's just a guy who plays golf for a living, why the big intrest in this? Who does this effect, other than him and his wife?

Breitbart.com : UK climate scientist to temporarily step down

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 19:57:05 +0000

Any doubt that Mr. Jones overstated the case for man-made climate change at the direction of Al Gore and the UN? Wouldnt it be great if Al Gore's facts were checked?????

Breitbart.com : Report: Russia to allow pre-emptive nukes

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:16:56 +0000

these do nothing shields sure did worry the Russians for some strange unknown reason?

Breitbart.com : Report: Russia to allow pre-emptive nukes

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:15:28 +0000

Seemed to have worked real well under Reagan. What about the idea of haveing some type of defence in countries like Poland to knock down a few of those "pre-emtive" nukes? I dont know something about peace through strength?

Breitbart.com : Groups decry police response to protesters at G-20

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:11:34 +0000

Is it easier to single out one or two trouble makers from a peaceful protest than it is to single out one or two peaceful protesters from an anarchist’s riot? I know this is not what dcunning30 said, but shouldn’t common since should prevail?

Breitbart.com : Groups decry police response to protesters at G-20

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:05:19 +0000

I fully agree with the right to protest. In fact I have spent 24 years defending the rights of every American to free speech, lawful assembly, and to peacefully protest. However, there is a line between peaceful protest and protection of the public safety. Historically the protests at the GXX Summits have been anarchist protests, which are very violent. Public and private property has been damaged; personal safety has been at risk. When it comes to this type of protest (anarchist) the police have a duty to protect and serve the public interest. What would be the reaction if the police did not error on the side of safety? What would the reaction have been if the police were not able to control the crowd and the $50,000 damage tuned out to be a drop in the bucket? Peaceful protest is one thing; a riot is a completely different matter. Was there a need for arrest at the TEA Party in D.C? The TEA Party was also a protest against the Government; however, there was no property damage, nor arrest. It’s the form of protest that is a danger to public safety.

Breitbart.com : Groups decry police response to protesters at G-20

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:16:00 +0000

Breitbart.com : Groups decry police response to protesters at G-20

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:51:28 +0000

The vast majority of protestors at the G20 meeting have historically been Anarchist, which by definition advocates NO RULES, NO LIMITS, so…..now these Anarchist are upset that the police (in their mind) didn’t follow the rules????? If you are there at the protest, you get the same treatment as everyone else there. Seems to me that if put yourself in that situation, how can you expect not to suffer the consequences?

Breitbart.com : How many people have you slept with? 2.8 million?

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:07:39 +0000

Well, this explaines alot

Breitbart.com :

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:47:08 +0000

The VP CAN, work with the Senate to shape policy. The VP IS in charge of the Senate which means taking charge of the direction. Just because other VP choose to only show up to break ties, or sit behind the President when he addresses Congress does not mean she is incorrect in her answer.

She is talking to an 8 year old, how detailed does she need to be? But in my opinion the answer should be more than just breaking ties. Even a 3rd grader knows that’s not much of a job.

Breitbart.com :

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:43:08 +0000

Okay, that was just a gaft, no worse than Obama’s and Biden’s. Are you serious that you didn’t know she was speaking about the DOJ?

Breitbart.com :

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:42:06 +0000

Her answer was correct. Just because other VP did not exercise this role does not mean that the role does not exist. She was correct.

Breitbart.com :

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:41:09 +0000

I didn’t see the interview, I took what you said was her answer, read the Constitution and what she said was correct.

Okay, if you want to move on to a different example, yes, she over thought the answer. At that time, most of the insurgents were coming from Iran. She was speaking about the war against terrorism, correct? The War on Terrorism is a war involves ALL nations that support terrorism. The strategies she was speaking about includes trying to stop the insurgents coming from Iran.

Okay, she has a problem over simplifying her answers to terms that simple minded people who are diligent in trying to analyze every word she says. May be her mistake is expecting people to be informed about what’s going on.

Breitbart.com :

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:29:07 +0000

I’m not sure what you’re talking about in your first two points. But as for the death panels, you are correct there is no term death panels in the bill, however, if you read the bill, the unintended consequences would result in government burocrates deciding on your quality of care. Burocrates will decide how much money will be spend on treatment. Which will result in the in the same as a death panel.

Her statement must have touched a nerve. They went in and changed to wording in the bill. Wonder why?

Breitbart.com :

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:28:08 +0000

There is no stretch, what she said was correct, how much detail did you want her to go into when dealing with a 8 year old?

The VP IS the President of the Senate. They have every authority to work with other Senators to shape policy and bills just like every other Senator. Are you saying that the Pro Tempore does nothing but break ties too?

Breitbart.com :

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:18:05 +0000

Her ideas and principles are the very same ones that all conservatives have.
Smaller government
Lower taxes
Free market solutions
Energy independence which include ALL forms of energy
Strong national defense

If you don’t know her ideas and principles you haven’t been listening to her speeches and looking into her record.

Breitbart.com :

Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:16:25 +0000

According to Article I section 3. "The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no vote, unless they be equally divided. The Senate shall choose their other officers, and also a President pro tempore, in the absence of the Vice President, or when he shall exercise the office of President of the United States." __As President of the Senate, he/she is incharge (leads the Senate much like Speaker of the House) of the Senate but only vote to break ties. Just because other VP have not exercised this role does not mean it cant be done. I'm sure the founding fathers didnt intend the "President" to be just a figure head.

Breitbart.com :

Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:02:38 +0000

Gibson asked a confusing question, (how many times does an interviewer need to reword questions?) once he clarified what he was looking for, what she said does indeed match the doctrine. If we know were about to be attacked, we have a right to defend ourselves. Meaning how else would you defend yourself from an imminent attack, but a preemptive strike? Does she really have to use the buzz words "preemptive strike"?

Breitbart.com :

Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:33:11 +0000

Didn’t think anyone would take time out from their drive bys to actually come up with real examples to back up their fantasies.

Breitbart.com :

Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:28:10 +0000

I’ve got a challenge for everyone who thinks Palin is a dimwit, or moron. ____Site an example of her not being informed on a topic or of her giving a wrong answer.__And don’t even try about the “death panels”. The bill may not spell out the words death panel, but in reading the bill, that would be the exact result. Why else did Congress go in and change the wording?____Good luck on that.