IntenseDebate - SchriSchri

16 years ago @ Big Government - Wednesday Open Thread:... · 1 reply · -2 points

Methinks thou dost protest too much.

16 years ago @ Big Government - Wednesday Open Thread:... · 1 reply · -4 points

Are the qualifiers "circular patterning," "bloated," "keen sense," essential here?
Do they enhance your remarks?
Did I reference self-assurance or the absence of it?
Did I cast aspersions like "marsh dwellers" etc?

According to the instrument/s used for verification, a definitive conclusion about the perceived color of the sky can be determined.

16 years ago @ Big Government - Wednesday Open Thread:... · 4 replies · -4 points

I'm not doing diagnosis.
I consistently labelled one counterpart as a bully.
That is not diagnosis.
It is behavioral management.

What do you think the posture should be when encountering an oddity?

16 years ago @ Big Government - Wednesday Open Thread:... · 0 replies · -2 points

Can you explain how you reached the conclusion?

16 years ago @ Big Government - Wednesday Open Thread:... · 2 replies · -3 points

It doesn't matter who I am.
Nor do I have any attachment to the illusion of control.
The more questions asked, the more material I garner.

16 years ago @ Big Government - Wednesday Open Thread:... · 1 reply · -3 points

Once again, self assertion and bluster. See my comments elsewhere.
(It is a desirable step away from bullying however. So in this reformation, you must be commended.)

16 years ago @ Big Government - Wednesday Open Thread:... · 3 replies · -4 points

dAnconia_Copper, your wish for prestige and status are understandable, considering your bullying behavior.

Analysis is a subset of narrative. Often a very small subheading or series of subheadings in a narrative of breadth and scope.

You have given your remarks a lower status than what I attributed to them.

16 years ago @ Big Government - Wednesday Open Thread:... · 1 reply · -3 points

Ahem. Do cite when I asked for your help.

16 years ago @ Big Government - Wednesday Open Thread:... · 3 replies · -4 points

Yes. With a bully, you must consistently insist that they back off until they do so.

Then, in the management of a bully, you must recognize their positive behavioral and postural changes with verbal acknowledgements.

In the verbal exchanges that comprise the manifold spaces of this thread, I have gotten you to back off.

16 years ago @ Big Government - Wednesday Open Thread:... · 3 replies · -3 points

Your preference for self-assertion is noted.

Noted as well is your belief that bullying is a show of something other than weakness.

My questions i.e. regarding "proof" or "scientific" are intended to interrogate assumptions.

You rely on these assumptions to make a narrow way around reality.

It will take hard, hard work to rescue you from this.

For instance, do you have a passport?
Do you speak a language in addition to english?
Have you been invited to the home of an acquaintance/stranger in a non-english speaking society?

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with SchriSchri

People I'm following

SchriSchri