IntenseDebate - RuGBYZHGT

15 years ago @ GazetteOnline.com - Evidence contradicts 9... · 1 reply · 0 points

http://current.com/items/89204971_death-star-over...

15 years ago @ GazetteOnline.com - Evidence contradicts 9... · 0 replies · 0 points

Hmmm... No way the planes could be a hologram?
http://current.com/items/89204971_death-star-over...

15 years ago @ GazetteOnline.com - Evidence contradicts 9... · 1 reply · 0 points

Further, we had a later conversation via e-mail with Crockett Grabbe, a former University of Iowa visiting professor from Caltech (Steve Koonin co-professor), who wrote a guest article with the paper supporting the theory that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition. In his response to my questioning of his article, he indicated that the charges set in building seven were set such that they were inaudible which explained why NIST found that building seven did not make any sound entirely through the internal progressive collapse and partially through the global collapse (disproving the strawman that explosives and thermitics were used to destroy the building). Obviously, NIST cornered themselves by stating that the buildings, made up of thousands of tons of steel (similar to dump trucks), could collapse for many seconds without emitting any crashing sounds. Further, they exposed Grabbe and Grabbe exposed himself and anyone in the Scholars group that he associates himself with as leaders of the diversion away from the physical evidence. Why would anyone say the building fell without crashing sounds unless they don't want people to consider what the NIST had said?

15 years ago @ GazetteOnline.com - Evidence contradicts 9... · 2 replies · +1 points

No, I met with the Gazette and they have yet to return to me with any refutation of anything that I presented. Our pictorial evidence allowed them to make their own decisions about what they were seeing. What was interesting was how simple they found the determinations that they made for themselves.

15 years ago @ GazetteOnline.com - Evidence contradicts 9... · 5 replies · +2 points

So, if the physical evidence of the crime scene completely contradicts our understanding of the crime (planes, box cutters, extremist terrorists), how will we ever find closure to this event? The simple answer is, we will not.

Russ Gerst of Cedar Rapids is a financial analyst and 1988 Coe College cum laude graduate with degrees in business and accounting and a minor in mathematics. Contact him at rdgerst@iname.com"

I have not made any reference to the Bush Administration and any culpability in 9/11. The evidence doesn't directly connect them, but I do have tremendous documentation of the coverup and the culpable players. There is also strong evidence that two corporations have been involved in the cover-up having known full well that technology exists (which they have financially supported) and that the evidence presented by NIST was not borne out by the pictorial evidence. We must start with the pictorial evidence and let it and the measurement data take us where it leads. Until that point, the errors in blame for who committed the atrocities of 9/11 will continue.

15 years ago @ GazetteOnline.com - Evidence contradicts 9... · 0 replies · +1 points

Cars as close as a block away and as far away as a mile were inexplicably delaminated, charred, and in some cases, engine blocks disintegrated.

Sound recordings of WTC 7 (destroyed during the afternoon) adjusted for relevant distance were devoid of the sound of falling debris many seconds after collapse initiation cited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology in their report of the building’s demise.

Magnetometer readings from Alaska indicated abrupt changes to the earth’s magnetic field at precisely the time of the plane entries and building destruction at the WTC.

A large, powerful hurricane (Erin) southeast of the coast of New York went unreported. Outer bands reached the Massachusetts coast as it turned slowly and abruptly that day. Reached Category 3 status on 9/10 during a four-day direct path from the Bahamas to New York with no evidence of direction change.

Comparative analysis to electromagnetic interference technology using electromagnetic fields with various wavelengths of electromagnetic energy indicates strikingly similar material phenomena noted above."

15 years ago @ GazetteOnline.com - Evidence contradicts 9... · 0 replies · +1 points

Massive volumes of dust several inches thick (like snow) could be found for several square miles around the WTC complex.

Large volumes of soil were hauled into Ground Zero, mixed with debris, and hauled away. Photographic evidence indicates this still occurring to this day. Trucks are thoroughly hosed down before leaving, as if contaminated."

Frame by frame video analysis of the 175-foot plane striking the second tower indicates no deceleration from nose to tail (all frames indicate the same distance traveled). Yet the plane fully decelerated in the remaining 75 feet of building without exiting on the opposite side. Emergency personnel debriefing testimonies indicates no evidence of a screaming plane nor diving for cover. Contrarily, testimony of military plane noise indicated appropriate response to a further attack as witnesses noted hearing them and taking appropriate cover.

Collapse times of the Twin Towers and Building Seven occurred at or beyond free-fall speed in a vacuum (no air resistance). Taking into account the relative volumes of building above and below the collapse zone, the collapses should have occurred far more slowly, if at all."

15 years ago @ GazetteOnline.com - Evidence contradicts 9... · 0 replies · 0 points

We are welcome to our own opinions, not to our own facts. What I included in my article was not opinion, but fact. Scientific reality is based on the evidence and any explanation of the reality as measured and documented must be based on known scientific understanding (to rule out the official theory). If known scientific understanding cannot explain what occurred, the evidence itself must point the way. In this case, the evidence and measurements point toward some form of interference technology using mutliple forms of electromagnetic energy. Part of the article was removed due to space limitations, but what I wrote was this:

15 years ago @ GazetteOnline.com - ABC-TV News' Trade Tow... · 0 replies · 0 points

The Gazette never took down any of my articles, particularly the article they published in July, 2009. This article prompted a follow-up editorial that was published in late July, 2009. The reason these articles are no longer available online is that the Gazette changed its web portal and did not pull forward all of their archives. Nothing that any commenter said caused the Gazette to step back and consider anything presented by me as false or misleading. Not one point.

16 years ago @ GazetteOnline.com - ABC-TV News' Trade Tow... · 0 replies · 0 points

Oh, yes. And you know the old child's rhyme: Sticks and stones... When someone has nothing left, they resort to calling names and calling someone crazy. That is when you know you've won the argument.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with RuGBYZHGT

People I'm following

RuGBYZHGT