IntenseDebate - RightWingNutter

15 years ago @ Big Government - Why They Don't Need To... · 0 replies · +2 points

"Behavior profiler" would be a good post military career path for a lot of our ex-military too. It might put a crimp on Xe or Triple Canopy recruitment, but you could have a life.

Not mentioned in the article was the "trusted passenger" concept where a (probably frequent) traveler could have a thorough background check done and then a retina scan. Thereafter they would be able to breeze through security with just the retina scan.

16 years ago @ Big Government - 2010: A Race Odyssey -... · 1 reply · +1 points

I doubt of Rep Lewis is interested in helping the United Negro College Fund. He would try harder to manufacture evidence if the $10K went to one of the pieces of ACORN left over after the dissolution of the parent organization.

16 years ago @ Big Journalism - Introducing: Retracto,... · 0 replies · +1 points

I love it! One suggestion:

"We need the news not projection"
changes to
"We need the news not invention"

17 years ago @ Breitbart.com - N. Korea warns interce... · 0 replies · +1 points

The NorKs are simply huffing and puffing. We don't need to hit them at launch. A orbital track and speed is a lot different from partial orbital (e.g. ballistic missile) track and speed. Radar will tell us in seconds from burnout whether the launch is intended to be a satellite. If it isn't, and heading somewhere we want to protect we can shoot it down.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Description

Connect with RightWingNutter

People I'm following

RightWingNutter