<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/565640</link>
		<description>Comments by Ogeechee</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Musician Cat Power Sides with Suicide Bomber Apologists Over Israel</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bdarby/2012/02/28/musician-cat-power-sides-with-suicide-bomber-apologists-over-israel/#IDComment303992890</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m with you. I literally have never heard of her before. There are enough well-known celebritards that we don&amp;#039;t have to point out the obscure ones. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bdarby/2012/02/28/musician-cat-power-sides-with-suicide-bomber-apologists-over-israel/#IDComment303992890</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Tosh.0&#039; Review: Repulsive, Offensive, Politically Incorrect and Undeniably Hilarious</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/21/tosh-0-review-repulsive-offensive-politically-incorrect-and-undeniably-hilarious/#IDComment299211550</link>
<description>You forgot that he&amp;#039;s hilarious, something that Jersey Shore is not (intentionally). If gross humor isn&amp;#039;t for you, that&amp;#039;s fine. But the selling point of his show for me is he&amp;#039;s funny.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/21/tosh-0-review-repulsive-offensive-politically-incorrect-and-undeniably-hilarious/#IDComment299211550</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Tosh.0&#039; Review: Repulsive, Offensive, Politically Incorrect and Undeniably Hilarious</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/21/tosh-0-review-repulsive-offensive-politically-incorrect-and-undeniably-hilarious/#IDComment298718763</link>
<description>1) I think it&amp;#039;s a funny show. I can understand if people don&amp;#039;t like his humor. It&amp;#039;s certainly not for everyone. But I do. Maybe that says a lot about me.    2) I think it&amp;#039;s pointless to try and divine any politics out of this show. I&amp;#039;ll put it this way: anyone who tries is way too into politics and should be made fun of. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 04:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/21/tosh-0-review-repulsive-offensive-politically-incorrect-and-undeniably-hilarious/#IDComment298718763</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Brokaw, NBC Threaten Legal Action Against Romney Camp For Using Clip In Ad</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/sright/2012/01/29/brokaw-nbc-threaten-legal-action-against-romney-camp-for-using-clip-in-ad/#IDComment277983105</link>
<description>A couple of thoughts:    1) I find it funny that he thinks his role as a &amp;quot;journalist&amp;quot; would be compromised by simply letting him talk. Think about that, Tom.     2) I&amp;#039;m not sure the point by Romney on this ad. As if any conservative voter would think, wait, if NBC thinks Newt is bad....he must be bad. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/sright/2012/01/29/brokaw-nbc-threaten-legal-action-against-romney-camp-for-using-clip-in-ad/#IDComment277983105</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Who&#039;s With Whom? Conservative Media Casts Lots In Primary Race</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/01/28/whos-with-whom-conservative-media-casts-lots-in-primary-race/#IDComment277104631</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not sure any of the 4 right now would be that great a president. Like I said above, I think Santorum would do the best job. It would be easy to say I like Daniels, Jindal....people who aren&amp;#039;t in the race, but they aren&amp;#039;t in the race.  If I had to choose between Romney and Gingrich, I would likely wimp out and say Romney because I think he would have the best chance of beating Obama. But that is a terrible way to choose someone. I want to vote for someone because I think they will do a good job.  But my point is the liberal-like thinking of this site. I get it, the editors of this site like Gingrich. But to say that anyone who thinks Gingrich isn&amp;#039;t a good choice means it&amp;#039;s some Romney conspiracy is getting into tin-foil hat, MSNBC territory.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/01/28/whos-with-whom-conservative-media-casts-lots-in-primary-race/#IDComment277104631</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Who&#039;s With Whom? Conservative Media Casts Lots In Primary Race</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/01/28/whos-with-whom-conservative-media-casts-lots-in-primary-race/#IDComment277013666</link>
<description>I like Santorum the most of the 4. And before anyone says he&amp;#039;s not electable...I would have a better chance of being elected than Newt.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/01/28/whos-with-whom-conservative-media-casts-lots-in-primary-race/#IDComment277013666</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Who&#039;s With Whom? Conservative Media Casts Lots In Primary Race</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/01/28/whos-with-whom-conservative-media-casts-lots-in-primary-race/#IDComment276965610</link>
<description>Let me get this straight. If I think that Newt Gingrich has no business being president, that means I&amp;#039;m for Romney? Is that what passes for intelligence on this site?  I get enough intellectual dishonesty from my liberal friends. I would have thought folks here would be smarter than that.  It doesn&amp;#039;t matter who else is running. Newt Gingrich would be a terrible president. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/01/28/whos-with-whom-conservative-media-casts-lots-in-primary-race/#IDComment276965610</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Jeffrey Lord Takes Elliot Abrams To Task Over Gingrich-Reagan Hit</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/01/27/jeffrey-lord-takes-elliot-abrams-to-task-over-gingrich-reagan-hit/#IDComment276474209</link>
<description>Did you even read Newt&amp;#039;s remarks? If that was backing Reagan, I&amp;#039;d hate to see what he would say if he thought Reagan was messing up.   That was a lame attempt by Lord. He has no basis for saying anything. Reading is FUNdamental.  Uh-oh </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 03:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/01/27/jeffrey-lord-takes-elliot-abrams-to-task-over-gingrich-reagan-hit/#IDComment276474209</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Charge: &#039;Hawaii Five-0&#039; Crew Members Disrespect Pearl Harbor Veterans</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2011/12/13/charge-hawaii-five-0-crew-members-disrespect-pearl-harbor-veterans/#IDComment237078039</link>
<description>I agree with this. I think they do a pretty good job by Hollywood standards of showing the military in a goof light (mostly). My guess is, these were spoiled, self-important jacktards who really didn&amp;#039;t have any idea what was going on. December 7th is the day after December 6th to them. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 21:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2011/12/13/charge-hawaii-five-0-crew-members-disrespect-pearl-harbor-veterans/#IDComment237078039</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Kim Kardashian and the Celebrity Marriage Disaster</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lveneziani/2011/11/07/kim-kardashian-and-the-celebrity-marriage-disaster/#IDComment218344750</link>
<description>Hmm, a few things:    1) She makes a sex tape and it got her off to a rocky start? How about, it helped her immensely.    2) This was a sham marriage to get ratings, publicity, money, etc. Giving any emotional connection to it is emotion not well spent. It was a brilliant move on her part. People keep talking about her.    Personally, I don&amp;#039;t really care why celebrity marriages don&amp;#039;t work. Most are libtards who probably don&amp;#039;t believe in God, so their &amp;quot;vows&amp;quot; are simply lines they read as actors. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lveneziani/2011/11/07/kim-kardashian-and-the-celebrity-marriage-disaster/#IDComment218344750</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Zoe Saldana: Racists Enjoy Seeing America Struggle</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/08/29/zoe-saldana-racists-enjoy-seeing-america-struggle/#IDComment187718778</link>
<description>People in Hollywood say a lot of stupid things. This one literally baffles me. I have no idea what the hell she is talking about. People are glad to see American down and that&amp;#039;s racist. Huh? I have no idea what she is even trying to say.   Actually, I&amp;#039;m not enjoying the fact that America is down and want our President to go. Does that make me racist too?  Of course it does. Just asking the question makes me racist. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/08/29/zoe-saldana-racists-enjoy-seeing-america-struggle/#IDComment187718778</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Wisconsin Open Thread</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/08/09/wisconsin-open-thread/#IDComment181777023</link>
<description>So, the Dem spokes-tool said they think there has been vote tampering. Which of course simply means, the Dems lost and now must pitch a hissy fit.    Nothing, and I mean nothing is ever a Democrat&amp;#039;s fault or responsibility. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 04:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/08/09/wisconsin-open-thread/#IDComment181777023</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Ricky Gervais &#039;Christ&#039; Photo Isn&#039;t Controversial. It&#039;s Just Bad Art.</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lmeyers/2011/07/27/ricky-gervais-christ-photo-isnt-controversial-its-just-bad-art/#IDComment177849350</link>
<description>Let Gervais dress up like Mohammed and put that picture all over the internet. And then add him to your dead pool pronto. Oh wait, I&amp;#039;m sorry. Mohammed is the prophet of a peace loving religion. My bad. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lmeyers/2011/07/27/ricky-gervais-christ-photo-isnt-controversial-its-just-bad-art/#IDComment177849350</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Dems Freak Over Republican Screening of &#039;Town&#039; Clip; Ben Affleck Responds</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/07/27/dems-freak-over-republican-screening-of-town-clip-affleck-responds/#IDComment177830858</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s not Ben, it&amp;#039;s the Dems who are crying about it that is funny.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/07/27/dems-freak-over-republican-screening-of-town-clip-affleck-responds/#IDComment177830858</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Dems Freak Over Republican Screening of &#039;Town&#039; Clip; Ben Affleck Responds</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/07/27/dems-freak-over-republican-screening-of-town-clip-affleck-responds/#IDComment177830180</link>
<description>Anyone who gets their panties in a bunch for using that scene as a metaphor for what the GOP needs to do simply doesn&amp;#039;t understand pep talks. Really libtards? You are going to comment about the movie and how it&amp;#039;s bank robbers and that&amp;#039;s bad because they are violent, blah, blah, blah? Boo-freakin-hoo.    Man, this country is a bunch of limp-wristed, mamma&amp;#039;s boys who have never had to rally around anything.     Pathetic. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/07/27/dems-freak-over-republican-screening-of-town-clip-affleck-responds/#IDComment177830180</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Sound Bite for the Day: Comfortable Bar Stools</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/07/27/sound-bite-for-the-day-comfortable-bar-stools/#IDComment177827415</link>
<description>I love Ed. He&amp;#039;s that crazy guy that no one takes seriously, but watches to see if he does something stupid. The man seems incapable of coherent thought, as this video shows. But he&amp;#039;s entertaining in a did-he-just-say-that sorta way.  He&amp;#039;s just too damn entertaining. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/07/27/sound-bite-for-the-day-comfortable-bar-stools/#IDComment177827415</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Carney Bats Down Press Inquiry as &quot;Republican Talking Points&quot;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/07/26/carney-bats-down-press-inquiry-as-republican-talking-points/#IDComment177638099</link>
<description>One thing Carney got right. He said Obama has talked a lot. He has. He just hasn&amp;#039;t said anything at all. Other than balanced, corporate jets, compromise, millionaires, default....buzz words they must have tested with focus groups.  What&amp;#039;s the old adage....if you repeat a lie often enough, it might become reality? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 02:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/07/26/carney-bats-down-press-inquiry-as-republican-talking-points/#IDComment177638099</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Fareed Zakaria: &quot;Tea Party is Extreme, Refuses to Compromise&quot;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/07/26/fareed-zakaria-tea-party-is-extreme-refuses-to-compromise/#IDComment177456667</link>
<description>To people like Fareed, the tea party is extreme. What? Follow the Constitution? That&amp;#039;s crazy talk!  They actually believe that Obama is a centrist. The perfect moderate (yet progressive), thinking man who is so smart that even when he makes mistakes, it&amp;#039;s because he is just too smart for his own good. And we&amp;#039;re just too dumb to realize it. The world is his sandbox and we should count ourselves lucky we&amp;#039;re able to witness it.  So yeah, the tea party is extreme if that&amp;#039;s your viewpoint. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/07/26/fareed-zakaria-tea-party-is-extreme-refuses-to-compromise/#IDComment177456667</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : White House Did Not Want GOP Response to Presidential Speech</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/07/25/white-house-did-not-want-gop-response-to-presidential-speech/#IDComment177341119</link>
<description>I wonder if anyone on his staff has the guts to tell him that he simply sucks at these things. Press conferences, speeches...doesn&amp;#039;t matter. He&amp;#039;s his own caricature. He had a prime time speech to say the same crap he&amp;#039;s been saying for awhile. No one bought it before, no one will buy it now. Seems even MSNBC is worried about him.   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 03:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/07/25/white-house-did-not-want-gop-response-to-presidential-speech/#IDComment177341119</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Brave&#039; Ricky Gervais&#039; Evangelical Atheism Finally Jumps Shark</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/07/25/brave-ricky-gervais-evangelical-atheism-finally-jumps-shark/#IDComment177339923</link>
<description>Wow, that article is awful. I have chills of embarrassment that Gervais wrote that. I&amp;#039;m going to pretend he did it as satire to pretentious celebrities who think they actually matter in the grand scheme of things.    John, you need to put a warning on these posts. Something like: Reading this may actually cause your head to explode.    And would it be in poor taste to say my favorite photo would be the after shot of the first picture? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 03:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/07/25/brave-ricky-gervais-evangelical-atheism-finally-jumps-shark/#IDComment177339923</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>