By the way, if anyone is curious how the French will be treated once the Muslims take over? Then look at the way the Copts are treated in Egypt and the way the Christians are treated in post Saddam Iraq today.

France doesn't have an Islamist problem, as the word "Islamists" prior to 9/11 referred to those who devoted their life to the study of Islam. Today, the word has been hijacked by unhinged moonbats and is used to connote radical/extremist Muslims.

Nevertheless, France doesn't really have an Islamist problem, because the existence of radical/extremist Muslims, like also the existence of moderate Muslims, is a political correct myth. They don't exist, never did. Instead, France has a mainstream orthodox Muslim problem, as jihad is the highest pillar of Islam and a holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims in the world. Hence, all of France's mainstream orthodox Muslim immigrants are jihadists in one form or another. Fortunately for France, most mainstream orthodox Muslim immigrants living in France are non-violent stealth and deceptive jihadists, but every once in a while one of them turns into a violent jihadists. Just like it happened in the USA with Nidal Hassan and the Boston Marathon Bombers and just like it also happened in the UK today.

On the other, he is a fundamentalist Muslim with radical associations and a heritage that pushes him towards a destructive world of violence and hate.

Dream on. He is a mainstream orthodox Muslim and his associations are not in the least radical or extremist, as jihad, which is holy fighting in the cause of Allah for the establishment of Islam is the highest pillar of Islam and also a fundamental holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims. In the Islamic world what would make him a radical and an extremist would be if he supported Israel, as it would also make him a blasphemous apostate and blasphemous apostates, per the texts and tenets of Islam, must be executed.

Far from being an American dream, Oday Aboushi has exhibited this exact type of extremism.

Extremism...really? Come on; please by all means point to just one Muslim that doesn't also condemn Israel at every opportunity. Thus, with respect to Islamic society, what makes the criticism of Israel and all other infidel states, for that matter, remotely extremists? Talk about a writer without a clue.

In any event, jihad, both of the violent variety and of the astronomically far more prevalent non-violent variety, is a holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims, as jihad is the highest pillar of Islam. Hence, all Muslims must wage jihad in one form or another. Otherwise, they could be deemed blasphemous apostates and be executed.

In fact, if the fallacy of so-called moderate Muslims wasn't a political correct fantasy and they really did exist, they would all be executed for being blasphemous apostates.

Indeed, the drafting of the stealth jihadists Aboushi by the New York Jets is in fact stealth jihad, as it is Muslim infiltration and Islamization. It's part of Islam's long-term strategic stealth jihad to demographically conquer America.

Here's one thing that Republicans all missed, because like the Dhimmicrats they too have largely been compromised when it comes to protecting America from the threat of Islam: When Obama and Hillary conveniently blamed Benghazi on that obscure youtube video they were also at the same time actively assisting the OIC in its international campaign to make any and all criticism of Islam an international crime.

“we do know that Islamic extremists with ties to al-Qa’ida participated in the attack.”

Uhm...Muslims that wage jihad are not Islamic extremists. That's utterly absurd, since jihad, which is holy fighting in the cause of Allah for the establishment of Islam is also the highest pillar of Islam and is a fundamental holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims. Thus, all mainstream orthodox Muslims and not just so called Islamic extremists and AQ members are jihadists in one form or another, as jihad manifest both violently and non-violently, but astronomically far more non-violently relative to violently. Hence, beyond blaming the obscure youtube video for Benghazi, why is the Obama administration along with both political parties in America lying to Americans about the true nature of jihad and Islam. That's what we really need to get to the bottom of. Indeed, that's where the true cover up lies.

From "My Noble Koran" published in Saudi Arabia by the “King Fahd Complex for the Printing of the Holy Qur’an, Madinah, K.S.A.

“Al-Jihad (holy fighting) in Allah’s Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry) is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of its pillars (on which it stands). Allah’s Word is made superior, (His Word being Lailaha illallah which means none has the right to be worshipped but Allah), and His Religion (Islam) is propagated. By abandoning Jihad (may Allah protect us from that) Islam is destroyed and the Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honour is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim, and he who tries to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to fulfill this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.”

By the way, in case anyone is wondering, the Koran is not anything like the Bible as it is immutable and can't be changed under any circumstances. Additionally, besides building approximately 80 percent of the world's mosques, the Saudis also publish and distribute the vast overwhelming majority of Korans as well.

There are a handful in Congress who understand the Islamic darkness within the deepest recesses of US power politics (and beyond), and they stand head and shoulders above the rest. They include Cruz, Bachmann. Gohmert & a few others

If that were true, then why do they use inaccurate political correct terms like radical Islamic terrorists, when terrorism is not even holy fighting in the cause of Allah for the establishment of Islam, as that is jihad? Indeed, Timothy McVeigh, the Unabomber, Bill Ayers, and Bernadine Dohrn were not jihadists fighting in the cause of Allah for the establishment of Islam. Instead, they were terrorists.

In addition, Muslims that wage jihad, which in stark contrast to terrorism manifest both violently and non-violently but by far more non-violently relative to violently, are not radicals, i.e., political or religious extremists and outcast from mainstream Islamic society. Instead, they are all mainstream orthodox Muslims, as jihad, which is the highest pillar of Islam, is also a holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims. Thus, all Muslims are jihadists in one form or another, and that includes the millions of Muslims living in our midst today posing as immigrants that flat out refuse to assimilate and integrate and instead form Muslim enclaves that like clockwork eventually morph into Muslim no-go zones ruled by sharia as tiny Islamic statelets within the greater infidel host states. As a matter of fact, there are literally hundreds of no-go zones already sprinkled throughout Europe and they will soon inevitably be sprinkled throughout the USA as well. By the way, they are also literally sprinkled throughout Israel proper today also.

The challenge of radical Islamic terrorists.

Here's the problem: There are no such thing as radical Islamic terrorists. Indeed, I'm sorry but terrorism is not holy fighting in the cause of Allah for the establishment of Islam, as that is jihad. Timothy McVeigh, the Unabomber, Bill Ayers, and Bernadine Dohrn were not jihadists fighting in the cause of Allah for the establishment of Islam. Instead, they were terrorists.

Moreover, Muslims that wage jihad, which in stark contrast to terrorism manifest both violently and non-violently but by far more non-violently relative to violently, are not radicals, i.e., political or religious extremists and outcast from mainstream Islamic society. Instead, they are all mainstream orthodox Muslims, as jihad, which is the highest pillar of Islam, is also a holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims. Thus, all Muslims are jihadists in one form or another, and that includes the millions of Muslims living in our midst today posing as immigrants that flat out refuse to assimilate and integrate and instead form Muslim enclaves that like clockwork eventually morph into Muslim no-go zones ruled by sharia as tiny Islamic statelets within the greater infidel host states. As a matter of fact, there are literally hundreds of no-go zones already sprinkled throughout Europe and they will soon inevitably be sprinkled throughout the USA as well.

Today in the USA we have two political parties in power, the Dhimmicrat Party, comprised of all radical Marxists, and the Republican Party, comprised of liberals, but we don't have a party comprised of conservatives, which encompasses the largest majority of American voters in the country today. Thus, the majority of voters in America are stuck choosing between the lesser of two evils. Meanwhile, both political parties are incompetent as hell, especially when it comes to protecting America from the threat of Islam, as they obviously have both been compromised.

Apparently there is a Muslim sympathizer working for FPM that keeps deleting my posts. Anyway here it is again.

I'm not worried about Islamists, i.e., radical Muslims, as the existence of Islamists is a myth. Just like the existence of moderate Muslims is also a myth. However, I am worried about mainstream orthodox Muslims, since jihad is the highest pillar of Islam and a holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims. Thus, that means that mass Muslim immigration to the USA, just like everywhere else in the West as well, is really non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad for the long-term strategic purpose of Muslim infiltration, Islamization, and stealth demographic conquest.

One of the biggest problems we also have is our grossly incompetent politicians on both sides of the political aisle naively believe in the political correct fantasy of the existence of a radical Islam trying to hijack a moderate Islam, thanks to non-violent stealth and deceptive jihadists like Zuhdi Jasser and others. If that isn't enough, they also stupidly conflate what is really jihad as being terrorism, when jihad by definition is specifically and only holy fighting in the cause of Allah for the establishment Islam and in stark contrast to terrorism, manifest both violently, as in Nadal Hasan, and non-violently by stealth and deception, as in the millions of Muslim jihadists living in the West today posing as legitimate immigrants while steadfastly refusing to assimilate and integrate.

Furthermore, Islam requires the total, complete, and unconditional submission to the will of Allah under the penalty of death, unlike every other faith-based religion. Indeed, what other faith-based religions compel belief via the penalty of death? The answer is none of them.

In addition, the will of Allah is in essence sharia, which is Islamic law or Islamic jurisprudence, and sharia orders every single aspect of life down to the smallest details for every Muslim and non-Muslim infidel living under Islamic rule, which beyond religion also makes Islam a very rabid form of totalitarianism as well.

Hence, the question must be asked, why is Islam automatically provided the status along with all of the protections accorded under the first amendment of our constitution of being a religion on a par with Christianity and Judaism when it obviously is not a legitimate religion? Just because Muslims claim Islam is a religion in order to dupe the gullible kafir infidels it intends to Islamize, doesn't mean we have to be suicidal and tolerant to our own demise.

Islam must be declared a rabid form of totalitarianism on a par with Communism, outlawed, and mass Muslim immigration, which is really non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad, must be banned and reversed ASAP. The alternative is the eventual Islamization of American society, as is currently taking place throughout Europe.

You are indeed a glutton for punishment. As a matter of fact, you are the quintessential self-hating moonbat.

Well, now we have it. First, Skippy insists Muslims can't be terrorists....and now he insists they're all victims. Perhaps you're a Muslim sympathizer after all.

Holy fighting in the cause of Allah for the establishment of Islam is by definition jihad, and jihad is not only the highest pillar of Islam, it is also a fundamental holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims. Of course, leftwing loons like you like to conflate what is really jihad as being terrorism. That way you self-hating loons can blame America's foreign policy for creating terrorists and terrorism and call it blowback, which is utterly absurd. Nevertheless, jihad has been waged on a perpetual ongoing basis in the cause of Allah for the establishment of Islam against infidels in one form or another since shortly after the Hijra in 622 AD. Anyway, are you claiming that terrorism is somehow holy fighting in the cause of Allah for the establishment of Islam now? Indeed, do you believe that Timothy McVeigh was a jihadist fighting in the cause of Allah to establish Islam?

Moreover, jihadists unlike terrorists are not extremists and political outcasts. Instead, they comprise mainstream orthodox Muslims only, as jihad is the highest pillar of Islam and a fundamental holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims. Indeed, jihadists are specifically soldiers of Allah who do what they do in the cause of Allah...see Nidal Hasan's acts of jihad as opposed to terrorism. Meanwhile, terrorists, like the Unabomber, Bernadine Dohrn, and Bill Ayer's, on the other hand, are leftwing political extremists who perpetrate desperate acts of terrorism for various political causes other than in the cause of Allah. Thus, Muslim jihadists are always in the mainstream. Meanwhile terrorists, in stark contrast, are always only extremists. Not to mention also, they are always only non-Muslims as well.

Additionally, terrorism is always only violent. While jihad, on the other hand, is both violent, as in AQ and Nadal Hasan, and non-violent via stealth and deception, as in the millions of Muslim jihadists living in the West as immigrants for the strategic purposes of demographic conquest, Islamization, and Muslim infiltration. Also, only a tiny minority of Muslims pursue jihad violently. While astronomically far more Muslims pursue jihad non-violently via stealth and deception.

Hence, terrorists unlike Muslims are political extremists and outcast from mainstream society, while jihadists, on the other hand, comprise only mainstream orthodox Muslims striving in the cause of Allah for the establishment of Islam. And yes, Muslims can't be terrorists, because that would make them blasphemous apostates, which per the texts and tenets of Islam, must be executed. As they cease being Muslims the instant they abandon Islam and turn to whatever political cause motivates their acts of terrorism.

Skippy, coercion means being forced to do something AGAINST YOURWILL. If a Muslim gladly and enthusiastically complies with the dictates of his faith, HE IS NOT BEING COERCED!!!

So if a Muslim decides to speak out against Islam, they can? If a Muslim decides to leave Islam, they can? What are you smoking? If they decide not to pursue jihad, they can? Again, lay off the drugs?

You are right: most comply voluntarily, but nevertheless if some subsequently have second thoughts or a change of heart, oh well what about those? I bet you that because of the coercive threat of death that hangs over every Muslim's heads; most of them have already made peace about complying, since the alternative is death.

Indeed, in my company we have certain rules that if broken will result in immediate termination. Hence, my employees have no other choice but to make peace with those rules or otherwise go find another job. It's not as coercive as the threat of death, but it nonetheless is coercive enough to enforce our rules.

Your position is essentially saying that all Muslims are victims. You're very confused, poor soul.

Look at the Islamic world, it's very harsh, barbaric, and backwards exactly because of the totalitarian nature of Islam. Hence, all Muslims and non-Muslim infidels living as dhimmis under harsh Islamic rule are all victims! What are you blind as a bat or something? Apparently!