<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/2586477</link>
		<description>Comments by NashKlein</description>
<item>
<title>Defense Tech : A New Breed of Guided Missile Sub May Be Emerging</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/04/15/a-new-breed-of-guided-missile-may-be-emerging/#IDComment143162374</link>
<description>my bad 1.8 subs less </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/04/15/a-new-breed-of-guided-missile-may-be-emerging/#IDComment143162374</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Another F/A-18 Hornet Catches Fire On A Carrier</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/04/15/another-fa-18-hornet-catches-fire-aboard-the-vinson/#IDComment143159491</link>
<description>I know it&amp;#039;s hard to tell from the video but did anyone else think it looked like a fuel leak that ignited? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/04/15/another-fa-18-hornet-catches-fire-aboard-the-vinson/#IDComment143159491</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : A New Breed of Guided Missile Sub May Be Emerging</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/04/15/a-new-breed-of-guided-missile-may-be-emerging/#IDComment143157878</link>
<description>3x more misils per sub= 2 fewer subs constructed to maintain firepower and even with only a 20% increase in price per sub that is still like paying for 1.6 subs less. the military is learning to budget, horay! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/04/15/a-new-breed-of-guided-missile-may-be-emerging/#IDComment143157878</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Next Generation of Active Defense Systems Makes Combat Debut</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/03/02/next-generation-of-active-defense-systems-makes-combat-debut/#IDComment132021581</link>
<description>how do you train a suicide bomber? it&amp;#039;s not like they can practice blowing themself up! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Mar 2011 04:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/03/02/next-generation-of-active-defense-systems-makes-combat-debut/#IDComment132021581</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Next Generation of Active Defense Systems Makes Combat Debut</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/03/02/next-generation-of-active-defense-systems-makes-combat-debut/#IDComment132021165</link>
<description>why would they waste thier time with something we all know will not work, we all want to beleive that we can reason with anyone but the ones refusing to listen are us not them. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Mar 2011 04:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/03/02/next-generation-of-active-defense-systems-makes-combat-debut/#IDComment132021165</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : CNO: Fighter Gap? Don&#039;t Worry About It</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/03/02/cno-fighter-gap-dont-worry-about-it/#IDComment131981605</link>
<description>sure an F-18 isn&amp;#039;t perfect but it is definently better than nothing </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Mar 2011 00:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/03/02/cno-fighter-gap-dont-worry-about-it/#IDComment131981605</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Next Generation of Active Defense Systems Makes Combat Debut</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/03/02/next-generation-of-active-defense-systems-makes-combat-debut/#IDComment131883558</link>
<description>these days people call anyone they dont agree with &amp;quot;terrorists&amp;quot;. but I agree with you the current rules of war state that any military target is a legitamate target. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/03/02/next-generation-of-active-defense-systems-makes-combat-debut/#IDComment131883558</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : USAF Eyes Business Jets As Possible E-8 JSTARS Replacement</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/18/usaf-eyes-business-jets-as-possible-e-8-jstars-replacement/#IDComment129016198</link>
<description>the idea is to reduce cost not increase it. the fuel bill for the military would be insane having to use 747&amp;#039;s </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 03:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/18/usaf-eyes-business-jets-as-possible-e-8-jstars-replacement/#IDComment129016198</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Gates: J-20? Don&#039;t Worry About It</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/17/gates-j-20-dont-worry-about-it/#IDComment128743043</link>
<description>I am 17 and I am not verry economicaly literate. I try to pick up what I can but i will agree that I and others my age do not know about much that goes on in our country economically. to that I admit I am Guilty. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 05:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/17/gates-j-20-dont-worry-about-it/#IDComment128743043</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Gates: J-20? Don&#039;t Worry About It</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/17/gates-j-20-dont-worry-about-it/#IDComment128739947</link>
<description>we will be fine if we go in and finish fast all i am saying is if push comes to shove don&amp;#039;t piddle fart around. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 05:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/17/gates-j-20-dont-worry-about-it/#IDComment128739947</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Gates: J-20? Don&#039;t Worry About It</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/17/gates-j-20-dont-worry-about-it/#IDComment128736032</link>
<description>great piss the whole world off and have china shoot it&amp;#039;s nukes back at us. then create nuclear winter from the debrise that will either almost or compleatly kill off humanity. if you sugested an EMP i would be more inclined to agree with you but even that would paint us as the bad guys to the rest of the world and lets face it we are probable the most hated and feared nation on earth as it is. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 04:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/17/gates-j-20-dont-worry-about-it/#IDComment128736032</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Gates: J-20? Don&#039;t Worry About It</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/17/gates-j-20-dont-worry-about-it/#IDComment128734134</link>
<description>&amp;gt;WHat does Gates base his assumptions on? i think he throws darts at a board! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 04:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/17/gates-j-20-dont-worry-about-it/#IDComment128734134</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Gates: J-20? Don&#039;t Worry About It</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/17/gates-j-20-dont-worry-about-it/#IDComment128733829</link>
<description>so far his record says he is as acurate as the weather men ( rarely are their predictions corect where i live). </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 04:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/17/gates-j-20-dont-worry-about-it/#IDComment128733829</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Gates: J-20? Don&#039;t Worry About It</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/17/gates-j-20-dont-worry-about-it/#IDComment128733497</link>
<description>starting numbers only matter for a small amount of time. begining of our entrance into WW2 our military was not very large we didn&amp;#039;t win because we had the largest standing military. we won because we could replenish losses faster than our enemies. so i will have to agree with blight the longer the war would last the less our chances of winning would be. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 04:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/17/gates-j-20-dont-worry-about-it/#IDComment128733497</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Another Fully Submersible Narco Sub Found</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/16/another-fully-submersible-narco-sub-found/#IDComment128462584</link>
<description>no i was thinking the same thing we have them play war games and target practice why not combine the two and do some good in the process </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 03:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/16/another-fully-submersible-narco-sub-found/#IDComment128462584</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Retro Tech Shaving Hours Off Tedious Journeys in Afghanistan</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/03/retro-tech-shaving-hours-off-tedious-journeys-in-afghanistan/#IDComment128039872</link>
<description>bombs can be placed any where, that is not the point of the article. the point is rather than spending money to build roads we can place these mats, thus decreasing travel time without too much increase to the cost of the war. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 05:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/03/retro-tech-shaving-hours-off-tedious-journeys-in-afghanistan/#IDComment128039872</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Congressional Hearing on Intelligence</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/14/congressional-hearing-on-intelligence/#IDComment128036836</link>
<description>somebody care to explain to me what a cyber pearl harbor is? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 04:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/14/congressional-hearing-on-intelligence/#IDComment128036836</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : C-17 is First Air Force Jet to Cleared to Fly on Biofuel</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/11/c-17-is-first-air-force-jet-to-cleared-to-fly-on-biofuel/#IDComment128033441</link>
<description>i do agree with you that making ethonol is a wasteful process and i am not saying that we will run out of oil soon. but the earlier we start researching alternative energy the better our chances are of avoiding an &amp;quot;ow $#!+ we can&amp;#039;t drive to work!&amp;quot; moment later. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 04:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/11/c-17-is-first-air-force-jet-to-cleared-to-fly-on-biofuel/#IDComment128033441</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : C-17 is First Air Force Jet to Cleared to Fly on Biofuel</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/11/c-17-is-first-air-force-jet-to-cleared-to-fly-on-biofuel/#IDComment127841725</link>
<description>so we will end up with excess fuel and debt, nice. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 06:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/02/11/c-17-is-first-air-force-jet-to-cleared-to-fly-on-biofuel/#IDComment127841725</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Navy One Step Closer to Using Lasers for Ship Defense</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/01/21/navy-one-step-closer-to-using-lasers-for-ship-defense/#IDComment127822130</link>
<description>light acts like a wave until we try to observe it at which point we shoot particles at it and it slows the paticles of light down. light is an object but it is traveling soo fast it behaves like a wave but once it reaches a denser object the likely hood of it coliding with another particle is greater. it is like shooting a bullet at a duck mid flight there is a lot of empty space around it (air). however if there is a group of ducks that are close together (solid or liquid) your bullet (light) is more likely to hit at least one of them. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 03:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/01/21/navy-one-step-closer-to-using-lasers-for-ship-defense/#IDComment127822130</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>