IntenseDebate

14 years ago @ Big Journalism - 'Tolerant' Huffington ... · 1 reply · +54 points

First they came for the Catholics, but I said nothing, because I'm liberal and tolerant and want people to think that I'm cool.

14 years ago @ Big Government - Clueless Socialists Pr... · 3 replies · +19 points

They sound like they would also protest to ban the suffraging of women.

14 years ago @ Big Government - What Do Democrats Have... · 0 replies · +17 points

Even when it comes to the "dangerous automatic weapons", gun control has no effect. Since required registration of automatic weapons (in the 1930s I believe but possibly earlier), there have been 4, yes four, gun crimes committed with registered automatic weapons. Three of those were rogue police officers. Based on that data, we should probably make a law against police officers owning automatic weapons.

14 years ago @ Big Government - Some Leftists Were For... · 0 replies · +11 points

Government likes to claim it will protect us from giant "monopolies" never noting that it is (and always has been) through sweetheart government deals that the so called monopolies got so big in the first place. And let's consider the "Big Three" automakers: three pretty independent auto manufacturers, united under one international labor union. Where is the federal government deciding that a labor union has gotten too big?

14 years ago @ Big Government - Pew Poll: Americans Ov... · 0 replies · +6 points

I forgot anti-hydroelectric: the most carbon-free source of energy we know, but shh, don't tell a liberal, you'll make them angry and that's very mean.

14 years ago @ Big Government - Pew Poll: Americans Ov... · 0 replies · +16 points

Democrats like to claim the Republican Party is the "anti-science" party. That's only because they believe the crap they spew about Keystone XL being dangerous. Wonder how many "good smart liberals" in New York and LA know about the completely safe fuel lines running under their very feet.

That doesn't even mention the number of liberals who are antivaccination, anti-genetic modification of food (but ironically pro-genetic modification of human stem cells), antinuclear, antidevelopment, anti-space-exploration, radically mistaken about "animal rights" and climate change, and generally antiscience-they-don't-agree-with. Makes those few "anti-evolution nuts" in the Republican Party look pretty insignificant.

14 years ago @ Big Peace - Obama Gives Diplomat J... · 0 replies · +51 points

Obama caught in a glaring broken promise? No, never.

14 years ago @ Big Government - Occupy and 'Planned Ci... · 3 replies · +5 points

How leftist protests work:
1) Throw brick at police
2) Turn on camera
3) Film police subduing and arresting you
4) Claim police brutality.

Normally, I would add ??? and PROFIT, but Occupy believes profit to be evil or something.

14 years ago @ Big Government - Santorum Supported Fed... · 1 reply · 0 points

Oh Eileen. I knew you would respond to anything dealing with the so called "NWO money". Take off the tin foil cap, and try to be reasonable for a second.

Rick Santorum is a good man and a good conservative, like ALL the other candidates right now. But his record (No Child Left Behind, TARP, his horrific Senate defeat etc.) can cause doubts in the minds of people who look into it. I agree with most of his past statements regarding life and God, but he phrased them so badly that if he is the nominee all the media will do is play him ranting. Rick Santorum is a great conservative but he is unable to articulate it the way Reagan did. That is why he would be a terrible nominee.

14 years ago @ Big Government - Santorum Supported Fed... · 17 replies · -9 points

This is called vetting. I know Rick Santorum is "more conservative" and "doesn't accent NWO money", but this is why he is unelectable. We are running against a President whose dismal economic record is only surpassed by his unpopular accomplishments. If we focus on the economy, we will beat him in a landslide. Rick Santorum has managed to single-handedly turn the debate off of the economy. What is his economic plan? Is it better than Mitt's, Newt's, Paul's? We cannot win with any candidate who so consistently veers off the straight and narrow path of economic conservatism.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with MrS85

People I'm following

MrS85