MrKelly
66p71 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
14 years ago @ KATU - Portland, OR - Rocks shatter windows ... · 0 replies · +1 points
14 years ago @ KATU - Portland, OR - Rocks shatter windows ... · 0 replies · +2 points
If you don't like capitalism, don't purchase things from or work for any capitalist. If such things don't exist, then create it for yourself and others.
15 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - Kucinich Slams Preside... · 0 replies · +2 points
Why are we there?
Define what success looks like?
What does it mean to "Win" this conflict?
All questions the media asked day in and day of Bush.
I expect the same level of coverage for this president.
15 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - Dem Rep Calls For Chri... · 0 replies · +5 points
I think we should call the progressives out on what they are. Selfish, greedy, spitfull. In their unsatiable persuit to shrink that gap, if the result doesn't lift the poor up. You need to be called out on it.
This man has made it clear that he wants to drag down the rich so incredibly bad, that he doesn't care if he takes the poor down a couple notches to do it.
15 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - Dem Rep Calls For Chri... · 0 replies · +6 points
Now, here he is, if you pay attention. Talking mostly about the gap between the rich and the poor, and how it needs to stop growing. But if you notice, just like every other socialist (And he is one). It's not about lifting the poor up, it's about pulling the rich down.
Unemployment bennefits (Something I believe we should have) does not lift the poor up in any way shape or form, it just keeps them static or slightly below were they were. Punishes them for trying to get ahead, by design. It gives people something to not work.
Tax cuts on the business owners, investors, savers, spenders, etc. Directly results in less economic opportunity for those who are unemployed.
15 years ago @ Breitbart.com - More than 8 million dr... · 0 replies · +1 points
Cause in effect is vital to understanding basic economics on any scale. And it is absolutly clear that government in any party is not capable of understanding the effects of their actions. This article points to one of them.
I used my credit to float my day to day business expenses via my purchases out of my wallet. Or online inventory purchases until the billing statement. I simply can't do that anymore. Sure I could alter my business model, but the added expense and risk of the alternative makes it just not worth it.
So I am closing my doors. for no other reason than the presidents anti credit card bill.
That is the effect, two more closed buisnesses, struggle for me and those who relied on my business for their income and services provided.
That was the effect of one politicians initial dream to make credit "Fair" for all.
15 years ago @ Breitbart.com - More than 8 million dr... · 0 replies · +1 points
When people in Washington pass a bill against the "Evil" credit card companies, the "Evil" health care co. Oil, etc. Those laws alter basic economics. They go against the laws of checks and balances on capitalism. They make it harder to do business, or otherwise alter the business plan of the entire industry. This by people who do not understand cause in effect. People that don't think through their laws any further than the first step, their good intentions.
15 years ago @ Breitbart.com - More than 8 million dr... · 0 replies · +1 points
I don't know if that's the reason?
I used to have 10+ credit cards with $133K available credit through two of my businesses and my personal.
Almost over night after president Obama signed his anti credit card bill, that available credit went down to about $30K. Some cards simply closed the account, others drastically cut the available credit. Not a one of them was left untouched.
What is more likely? Every credit card company decided to change their policy's in the exact same way? Or Trickle-Down economics is in play here? The more logical explanation is that an outside force that effected all credit companies the same, happend all at once. Hmmm. I wonder what that could be?
15 years ago @
Breitbart.tv -
C'mon, do we need talk like that?
Your statement is completely untrue. No good ol' boy would have done boo. This guy has done nothing that warrents the use of a gun in any way shape or form. Don't give us law abiding gun carrying good ol' boys a bad name with your careless commentary.
15 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - Thank you for your service.