Hollywood is entertainment.
I don't know which egomaniacal idiot actor first thought that a professional entertainer had any valuable insight into science that was anymore advanced than any other non-science related professional - but they sure started a trend. These days, even politicians testify before other politicians based on their expertise in science. Hey! Wake up America! Actors are entertainers particularly gifted at pretending to be someone or something else. Oddly enough - politicians are quite adept at this role playing also.
Why would ANYONE particularly value their guilt ridden concepts on subjects they are not educated on?
Hollywood actors are professional entertainers.
Politicians are professional liars.
They could replace him with Rick Sanchez. Just as shallow and insecure - but loved by millions of post menapausal women in Florida.
See definition for Pompus A$$
Yeah - all union people will vote for Coakley. And then Coakley will join the rest of the Democrats as a TOOL (useful idiot) of the unions making sure they get exempted from actually PAYING for the health-care they will force on us! I fear the Democrat party has drifted dramatically in recent years. No longer representing the will of the working man - unless he has a union card. Otherwise - they have replaced the Republicans as being in the pocket of big Pharma - Big banks - Government Motors - Big finance (Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac) and so on. Dubious? FOLLOW THE MONEY!
Obama - the "uniter" not a "divider" - the "ethical" Obama - the transparent government Obama - the "no lobbyist" Obama - last year's Obama might have been able to help the Croakly campaign just by showing up and providing some dialect free teleprompter speech reading. But we all know that that man was just the campaign illusion of a man. There was no such Obama. The problem now is that the Democrat party is not the party of the people any more. It is simply a union tool quite content to steam roll over the will of the people with a botox smile and plenty of snout lipstick. The fact that this race is an issue is a derivative of a failed party and a leader who was not "as advertised". I just hope that the people of MA are allowed a fair & free election. It is remarkable that anything else could be possible HERE.
Last year - when the world was excited about the prospect of a new lobbyist free, transparent government, doing the will of the people - a "uniter" not a divider - Obama could have helped Croakly with his dialect free teleprompter readings. But - a year later - reality is known by all except the most hardcore worshippers - Obama was an illusion. In fact, now more than ever, the Democrat party has been revealed as simply a tool of Unions. Anti-business and pro-big government. Whatever people think of the business world - the truth is - government jobs can not provide the tax base to pay for themselves.
Thomas - About those letters - unless you wrote them on "bank check safety paper", I'm afraid they don't read them. But - I still try myself, tilting away!
Liberal support for this comically titled legislation is remakably confusing. I can not begin to recall ALL the movies I have seen depicting strong-armed political elections and strong-armed union/corporate elections - usually depictied in some third world country (supposedly so politically corrupt that public voting can even exist.) Now we have all our elite liberals and supposed supporters of the underclass advocating the very thing they made careers out of illustrating the absurdity of. Inane. Yet, I can not look away.
Obama, Pelosi & Reid. Chicago, San Francisco & Vegas. These folks should not be running a 7-11. In fact, I doubt that they COULD run a 7-11. Do the voters is this country have any actual awareness of what they have done? Equally sad is that the only target still standing on the conservative side is Rush. And all hope of a third party went down the drain with Ross Perot's sanity. But on the bright side, .....
Maybe we WERE liberals back when we thought SNL was funny. I grew up. But SNL is still for children. You can only be politically naive once, but that does not prohibit people from staying permanently "naive".
Lorne simply is not funny anymore. Or maybe SNL was only funny when I was unemployed and stoned?
One or the other. Don't expect liberals to ever bite their master's hand though.
![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
Production