<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/350869</link>
		<description>Comments by MarcDanziger</description>
<item>
<title>The FASTForward Blog : Tools for tackling wicked problems: Review of Jeff Conklin&#039;s &ldquo;Dialogue Mapping&rdquo;</title>
<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2009/03/12/tools-for-tackling-wicked-problems-review-of-jeff-conklins-dialogue-mapping/#IDComment16914353</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m thrilled to see Rittel&amp;#039;s work acknowledged (he&amp;#039;s my old professor); but just to pick a nit, the paper which is generally considered to have introduced &amp;#039;wicked problems&amp;#039; was a paper he wrote with another professor of mine, Mel Webber - &amp;quot;Dilemmas In A General Theory Of Planning&amp;quot;. It&amp;#039;s available &amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.uctc.net/mwebber/Rittel+Webber+Dilemmas+General_Theory_of_Planning.pdf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;online as well&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 22:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2009/03/12/tools-for-tackling-wicked-problems-review-of-jeff-conklins-dialogue-mapping/#IDComment16914353</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>