<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Mack41's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/267679</link>
		<description>Comments by Mack41</description>
<item>
<title>Film School Rejects : 'It Might Get Loud' Trailer Gets... You Know...</title>
<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/it-might-get-loud-trailer-gets-you-know.php#IDComment23965692</link>
<description>I can&amp;#039;t wait to go see this.  Mainly because of Edge </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/it-might-get-loud-trailer-gets-you-know.php#IDComment23965692</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : It Might Get Loud Movie Trailer</title>
<link>http:/www.slashfilm.com/2009/06/09/it-might-get-loud-movie-trailer/#IDComment23744373</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;d go see a movie with just &amp;quot;that other guy&amp;quot; as you call him since he is amazing </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http:/www.slashfilm.com/2009/06/09/it-might-get-loud-movie-trailer/#IDComment23744373</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : CG Arnold Schwarzenegger Featured in New Terminator Salvation TV Spot</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/06/04/cg-arnold-schwarzenegger-featured-in-new-terminator-salvation-tv-spot/#IDComment23411100</link>
<description>Yeah, but look at the CG.  The pasted his body shoulders up on Roland Kisingers body and they clearly do not match perfectly.  I didn&amp;#039;t notice it when I saw the film, just in the picture at the top but now I see it.  Arnold shouldn&amp;#039;t be around yet.  Alternate timeline or not. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jun 2009 02:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/06/04/cg-arnold-schwarzenegger-featured-in-new-terminator-salvation-tv-spot/#IDComment23411100</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Film School Rejects : Cameron Talks 'Avatar'... And Talks... And Talks</title>
<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/cameron-talks-avatar-at-e3-and-talks-and-talks.php#IDComment23102548</link>
<description>He shot that T2 battle scene in like 3 days on a soundstage and improvised pretty much everything it sounded like.  Imagine, all the time, all the tech, and all the money that has been put into this movie.  I cannot wait to see this epic mother of all battles.  December is sooooooo far away..... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Jun 2009 21:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/cameron-talks-avatar-at-e3-and-talks-and-talks.php#IDComment23102548</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Oliver Stone to Direct Wall Street 2, Michael Douglas and Shia LaBeouf To Star</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/28/oliver-stone-to-direct-wall-street-2-michael-douglas-and-shia-labeouf-to-star/#IDComment20127381</link>
<description>ughh he gets on peoples nerves. and eagle eye sucked. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/28/oliver-stone-to-direct-wall-street-2-michael-douglas-and-shia-labeouf-to-star/#IDComment20127381</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : LOL: Pixar Vs. Dreamworks</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/02/lol-pixar-vs-dreamworks/#IDComment18047996</link>
<description>Pixar is great.  They have yet to release a bad film.  That is greatness </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/02/lol-pixar-vs-dreamworks/#IDComment18047996</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : LOL: Pixar Vs. Dreamworks</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/02/lol-pixar-vs-dreamworks/#IDComment18047959</link>
<description>I completely agree, but somehow Kung Fu Panda swept ALL of those animation awards against Wall-E last year. Strange...  And I thought Wall-E was the best film of last year.  Better than Slumdog IMO </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/02/lol-pixar-vs-dreamworks/#IDComment18047959</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Film School Rejects : Why Universal Should Aim for R-Rating with 'Bruno'</title>
<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/why-brunos-nc-17-and-corporate-censorship-dont-matter.php#IDComment17927152</link>
<description>haha sexual repression what a joke!  ERoBB are you an American?  Have you been to America?  Are all of the 300 million Americans ignorant?  Are only Americans ignorant?  I find you ignorant for assuming that all Americans must be ignorant.  And not wanting to watch two guys get it on is not sexual repression and unrest.  Some people may find that uncomfortable to watch.  That&amp;#039;s fine.  They don&amp;#039;t have to watch it.  Stop sounding like such a prick. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/why-brunos-nc-17-and-corporate-censorship-dont-matter.php#IDComment17927152</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Film School Rejects : Why Universal Should Aim for R-Rating with 'Bruno'</title>
<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/why-brunos-nc-17-and-corporate-censorship-dont-matter.php#IDComment17927005</link>
<description>Hahahaha exactly how I feel </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/why-brunos-nc-17-and-corporate-censorship-dont-matter.php#IDComment17927005</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Film School Rejects : Why Universal Should Aim for R-Rating with 'Bruno'</title>
<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/why-brunos-nc-17-and-corporate-censorship-dont-matter.php#IDComment17926976</link>
<description>No offense to the UK, but the film has a higher probability of making more in the US than in the UK, so they want to play it in as many theaters in the US as possible.  Now, that shouldn&amp;#039;t stop them from releasing a harder version any where else but it might.  I personally don&amp;#039;t like the fact that I am restricted in what I am seeing, but until theater chains loosen up and give the people a chance to see a film the way the filmmaker intended it to be seen, we&amp;#039;re going to have to deal with it.  It&amp;#039;s a compromise, and I believe that because they compromised on Borat and made it a success they were able to go ahead with Bruno which might be a little more raunchier.  Maybe in a couple years the MPAA will get some sense and get off their high horse of dictating what Americans can see in a cinema.  Its the same with the FCC who censor TV and I really, really hate censorship. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/why-brunos-nc-17-and-corporate-censorship-dont-matter.php#IDComment17926976</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Film School Rejects : Discuss: What is Your Favorite Christmas Movie of All-Time?</title>
<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-what-is-your-favorite-christmas-movie-of-all-time.php#IDComment12966851</link>
<description>National Lampoons Christmas Vacation, Home Alone, and Die Hard </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-what-is-your-favorite-christmas-movie-of-all-time.php#IDComment12966851</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Film School Rejects : Star Trek Trailer Gets Smacked Around By Some Real Science</title>
<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-trailer-gets-smacked-around-by-some-real-science.php#IDComment12803212</link>
<description>Who fucking cares?  Lets get a good story and be happy with some spectacle, fuck being correct. Lets have some fun with this movie </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-trailer-gets-smacked-around-by-some-real-science.php#IDComment12803212</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Film School Rejects : Denis Leary on Denis Leary. The Daily Diversion.</title>
<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/denis-leary-on-denis-leary-the-daily-diversion.php#IDComment12772660</link>
<description>Denis Leary is the MAN! Rescue Me, march or april, whatever, its too long </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/denis-leary-on-denis-leary-the-daily-diversion.php#IDComment12772660</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Film School Rejects : Wolverine Trailer Gets the Bootleg Treatment, Again</title>
<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/wolverine-trailer-gets-the-bootleg-treatment-again.php#IDComment12609823</link>
<description>Yeah i know Watchmen&amp;#039;s in March but i probably wont be able to see it until May, or hopefully I will be seeing it again in May cause it kicks that much ass </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/wolverine-trailer-gets-the-bootleg-treatment-again.php#IDComment12609823</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Film School Rejects : Wolverine Trailer Gets the Bootleg Treatment, Again</title>
<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/wolverine-trailer-gets-the-bootleg-treatment-again.php#IDComment12609360</link>
<description>That. Looks. Awesome. I cannot fucking wait for May 2009... Wolverine, Watchmen, Star Trek, Night at the Museum 2, TERMINATOR SALVATION!!!!! god, my grades are going to go down the shitter... </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/wolverine-trailer-gets-the-bootleg-treatment-again.php#IDComment12609360</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Film School Rejects : The Day the </title>
<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/the-day-the-box-office-stood-still.php#IDComment12608870</link>
<description>Yeah wth! I was going to go see Gran Torino, got to cause its Clints likely last acting role, and its playing absolutely NO WHERE by me... And the public&amp;#039;s getting smart, remakes+crappy looking CGI+disaster film+Keanu Reeves=a waste of money in hard economic times. Its simple mathematics. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/the-day-the-box-office-stood-still.php#IDComment12608870</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Film School Rejects : First Look: Sony Animation's Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs</title>
<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/first-look-sony-a#IDComment12316607</link>
<description>Yeah I too loved the book growing up and its distinct style. I dont know if its just been awhile, but this doesnt really look like the books... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Dec 2008 20:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/first-look-sony-a#IDComment12316607</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Film School Rejects : Michael Bay: No Transformers 2 Trailer Until February</title>
<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/michael-bay-no-transformers-2-trailer-until-february.php#IDComment12316584</link>
<description>I dont really agree. Sometimes that can be true, but Cloverfield&amp;#039;s first teaser was about 7 months prior to its release and did a great job of getting people excited and The Dark Knights first teaser came out awhile before, but did not include any actual footage.  For this Transformers 2 we pretty much know what to expect, explosions, robots fighting, hot girls, and awesomeness so a trailer isn&amp;#039;t to necessary...  And I really liked the Terminator trailer which really got me pumped </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Dec 2008 20:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/michael-bay-no-transformers-2-trailer-until-february.php#IDComment12316584</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Film School Rejects : Boiling Point: F#@% Free Runners!</title>
<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-f.php#IDComment12300197</link>
<description>I agree it should be used sparingly and properly for the most part.  I liked them in the bourne movies as well, but at parts in the third film I felt a little lost... As for QoS, haven&amp;#039;t seen it and don&amp;#039;t plan to until its on DVD </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Dec 2008 01:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-f.php#IDComment12300197</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Film School Rejects : EXCL: Spielberg Confirmed for Tintin Next, Lincoln Shortly After</title>
<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/kathleen-kennedy-talks-steven-spielberg.php#IDComment12295912</link>
<description>Finally! I can&amp;#039;t wait for this Lincoln movie!  Spielberg may still be directing Chicago right? I just checked Wikipedia and it didn&amp;#039;t say he wasn&amp;#039;t, but it also mentioned Ben Stiller as a possibility. WTF?  Could be interesting if Stiller could direct a serious film... but I&amp;#039;d rather see Spielberg </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Dec 2008 23:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/kathleen-kennedy-talks-steven-spielberg.php#IDComment12295912</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>