LivingDebtFree
44p44 comments posted · 0 followers · following 1
16 years ago @ Big Hollywood - 'L.A. Times' Writer Sl... · 0 replies · +1 points
16 years ago @ Big Hollywood - 'L.A. Times' Writer Sl... · 0 replies · +1 points
16 years ago @ Big Hollywood - 'L.A. Times' Writer Sl... · 2 replies · +1 points
16 years ago @ Big Hollywood - 'L.A. Times' Writer Sl... · 3 replies · +2 points
16 years ago @ Breitbart.com - House GOP pens 230-pag... · 0 replies · +1 points
16 years ago @ Breitbart.com - House GOP pens 230-pag... · 0 replies · +4 points
16 years ago @ Breitbart.com - House GOP pens 230-pag... · 0 replies · +5 points
5. If we had proper competition (and once again, adding a single government plan to the market doesn't significantly increase competition) then those companies would go out of business because people wouldn't buy insurance from them.
6. If we had proper competition, then we wouldn't have to subsidize them. A market would be out there to get their business. I believe that is how Wal-mart started...
16 years ago @ Breitbart.com - House GOP pens 230-pag... · 0 replies · +3 points
1. 50%+ aren't DUE to health care bills, but health care bills do play a factor along with credit card debt, spending beyond their means and several other factors. In the Harvard study that this statistic is cited from, medical bills over $1,000 (not paid by the insurance company) over a 2 year period were included.
2. Absolutely. I used to be in that statistic. I had the money. I didn't spend it on health care. But beyond this, it looks like the proposed republican bill is aimed to help those 25 million rather than trying to overhaul a system for 600 million people.
3. I'm in 100% agreement there as well. I find it as more of a matter of education though.
16 years ago @ Big Hollywood - New White House 'Guide... · 1 reply · +1 points
16 years ago @ Big Hollywood - RESPONSE TO NEA CHAIRM... · 1 reply · +2 points