<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/273835</link>
		<description>Comments by JuanRomero</description>
<item>
<title>wisequeen.com : Wuala Swiss Tech success </title>
<link>http://wisequeen.com/2008/12/19/wuala-swiss-tech-success/#IDComment13029722</link>
<description>I tried it a while back, when you still needed invites to join the beta. I very much liked, though I stopped using it, because it didn&amp;#039;t have the functionality to download files directly in the browser (like what one would use these services for: &lt;a href=&quot;http://mashable.com/2007/05/23/7-ways-to-send-huge-files-25x-bigger-than-gmail/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://mashable.com/2007/05/23/7-ways-to-send-hug...&lt;/a&gt;)  Does it have browser links to Wuala files, without the need to install it? Or is that still being worked on? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 08:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wisequeen.com/2008/12/19/wuala-swiss-tech-success/#IDComment13029722</guid>
</item><item>
<title>wisequeen.com : Marketing and networking web 2.0 to club or not to club</title>
<link>http://wisequeen.com/2008/12/01/marketing-and-networking-web-20-to-club-or-not-to-club/#IDComment11958434</link>
<description>&amp;quot;people first and company second&amp;quot; I will quote the heck out of this ;)  It seems like marketing was all about professional, impersonal brands just a minute ago and now it&amp;#039;s about talking to the people. If social media leads to a decrease of poorly targeted advertising and to a increase of good costumer service, I will be happy and companies&amp;#039; wallets will be less strained. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2008 08:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wisequeen.com/2008/12/01/marketing-and-networking-web-20-to-club-or-not-to-club/#IDComment11958434</guid>
</item><item>
<title>wisequeen.com : Marketing and networking web 2.0 to club or not to club</title>
<link>http://wisequeen.com/2008/12/01/marketing-and-networking-web-20-to-club-or-not-to-club/#IDComment11930904</link>
<description>I agree except for one point: Twitter personas are essentially a bad idea. Just compare Britney Spears&amp;#039; brand with the brand of MC Hammer. In theory, one would think that Britney has a massive following due to her revamped brand and that MC Hammer is nowhere (he&amp;#039;s certainly nowhere to be seen in Europe - I don&amp;#039;t know about the US) Yet, MC Hammer&amp;#039;s following on twitter is (slightly) higher than Britney&amp;#039;s. I&amp;#039;m inclined to think that the cause lies within Britney&amp;#039;s tweets: there are tweets from her team as well as, supposedly, from herself, while MC Hammer&amp;#039;s tweets feel like they&amp;#039;re from himself.      &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/mchammer &quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://twitter.com/mchammer &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/britneyspears &quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/britneyspears &quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://twitter.com/britneyspears &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;      Nobody want&amp;#039;s to sign up for an advertisement, but if I have the chance to talk to someone I&amp;#039;ll do it.      News media may have a little advantage over the other brands, but judging by @ricksanchez popularity on twitter and comparing that with his status at CNN I conclude that a person with a bit of an agenda is much more appreciated and embraced than a brand. It&amp;#039;s all about being yourself, as cheesy as it sounds ;) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Dec 2008 19:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wisequeen.com/2008/12/01/marketing-and-networking-web-20-to-club-or-not-to-club/#IDComment11930904</guid>
</item><item>
<title>wisequeen.com : Marketing and networking web 2.0 to club or not to club</title>
<link>http://wisequeen.com/2008/12/01/marketing-and-networking-web-20-to-club-or-not-to-club/#IDComment11922893</link>
<description>Amongst social media evangelists there seems to be a consesus on the &amp;quot;do or die&amp;quot; nature of social media. I beg to differ (only slightly). While for most companies, clubs, social groups etc. social media is already, well, uncircumventable, there probably will be a small space for a number of companies that consciously choose not to be accessible by our young communications channel to preserve some sort of (perceived) exclusivity. However, I don&amp;#039;t think that it&amp;#039;s generally a good thing to advice a company not to use social media/new media/web 2.0 (whichever term you prefer).  I think that social media channels will get pretty crowded pretty soon. Therefore I wouldn&amp;#039;t bet on traditional media or traditional marketing and PR (or costumer service for that matter) to disappear anytime soon. Moreover, social media complements traditional methods and channels beautifully, adding a new layer, with a lower threshold and higher potential for dialog, so I see synergy ahead rather than competition.  I think that the low threshold and low complexity of twitter is precisely what makes it powerful, since it&amp;#039;s exactly this simplicity that&amp;#039;s one of the main advantages of new media. Essentially, i think that twitter is the prototypical new media web app and due to its perfect timing and nice momentum I&amp;#039;m guessing it will be alive and kicking for quite some time.  Thanks for your insightful post :) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Dec 2008 14:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wisequeen.com/2008/12/01/marketing-and-networking-web-20-to-club-or-not-to-club/#IDComment11922893</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>