<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/310234</link>
		<description>Comments by JimMcGee</description>
<item>
<title>The FASTForward Blog : Tools for tackling wicked problems: Review of Jeff Conklin&#039;s &ldquo;Dialogue Mapping&rdquo;</title>
<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2009/03/12/tools-for-tackling-wicked-problems-review-of-jeff-conklins-dialogue-mapping/#IDComment17084061</link>
<description>Thanks for the pointer. Always willing to have useful nits picked :) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2009/03/12/tools-for-tackling-wicked-problems-review-of-jeff-conklins-dialogue-mapping/#IDComment17084061</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The FASTForward Blog : C-words of knowledge</title>
<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2009/02/03/c-words-of-knowledge/#IDComment14878933</link>
<description>I thought it would be more fun to constrain the problem in an arbitrary way to see what would happen than to try to capture every word that might apply. Based on what I&amp;#039;ve seen so far, it&amp;#039;s been more fun to play with the constraint even at the expense of other equally relevant words such as &amp;quot;share.&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2009/02/03/c-words-of-knowledge/#IDComment14878933</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>