725 comments posted · 4 followers · following 13
The forum admin has a full-time job and they've been away for a while. You will be approved shortly and, please, do not use that tone next time.
1) Replying to a six-year-old post is generally not a good practice, as it often yields no results.
2) You\'re lucky, despite the above. There\'s a back-up of those pieces here, on this website. http://invisible-movement.net/articles/old-blog
The woman's story was not pushed to the media by John himself. The paparazzi/gossip site TMZ got hold of the news through their sources and just...went with it. The whole idea of somebody working for the court selling writings on legal disputes to anybody is scarier than the incident itself. It's primarily they who don't care if somebody's life is ruined.
Why are we discussing this woman anyway? Why vent your personal frustrations and then claiming you're not allowed free speech on here? The woman was not covered on this website *because* we did not want to contribute to ruining a person's life, and almost three years later, there is suddenly a random discussion about her.
At the same time, calling John super-polite, decent et cetera does not make sense either - nobody is universally kind to everybody. He's probably horrible to some folks, as we all are. Neither extreme is good.