<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/4207511</link>
		<description>Comments by Icanseeclearly</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt To Romney: &#039;Stop The Pious Baloney&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-to-romney-stop-the-pious-baloney/#IDComment258803065</link>
<description>I like how Newt uses his extra-high-octave pious voice while saying we should stop the pious baloney....and describing how Romney lost an election....I guess it didn&amp;#039;t cross Newt&amp;#039;s mind he himself resigned under a cloud of corruption?      &lt;i&gt;After extensive investigation and negotiation by the House Ethics Committee, Gingrich was sanctioned $300,000 by a 395&amp;ndash;28 House vote. It was the first time in history a speaker was disciplined for ethical wrongdoing.&lt;/i&gt;    LOL!  Newt exposed worshipping them money-cult.  &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/kiaoragaza.files.wordpress.com\/2011\/12\/newt-gingrich-wears-jewish-skullcap-yarmulke.jpg\?w=490&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://kiaoragaza.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/new...&lt;/a&gt;  &amp;quot;I pray for a credit line at Tiffany&amp;#039;s...&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 20:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-to-romney-stop-the-pious-baloney/#IDComment258803065</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum To Romney &#039;We Need Someone Who Will Fight For Conservative Principles&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-hammers-romney-for-not-running-for-reelection-in-massachusetts-we-need-someone-who-will-fight-for-conservative-principles/#IDComment258798225</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;Santorum&amp;#039;s fight against Big Gay is a plus.&lt;/i&gt;  Sure, but it doesn&amp;#039;t make him any less &amp;quot;Left.&amp;quot;  Look at the wacky Catholic nabobs, the ones with large swarthy 3rd world worshipers in urban cesspit areas, and they are mostly commies but they will also oppose homosexuality, officially, because that same 3rd world lower-American base also doesn&amp;#039;t much care for them.  What we see is cultural marxism and that is about subverting American culture and interests so they are pro-homo, anti-White and pro-Israel - the direct opposite of American values. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 20:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-hammers-romney-for-not-running-for-reelection-in-massachusetts-we-need-someone-who-will-fight-for-conservative-principles/#IDComment258798225</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum To Romney &#039;We Need Someone Who Will Fight For Conservative Principles&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-hammers-romney-for-not-running-for-reelection-in-massachusetts-we-need-someone-who-will-fight-for-conservative-principles/#IDComment258793426</link>
<description>World security?  Who is the world police?  We need to close our borders to people and trade - THAT WOULD MAKE US SECURE.  Fighting pointless wars in the Middle East makes us less secure. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 19:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-hammers-romney-for-not-running-for-reelection-in-massachusetts-we-need-someone-who-will-fight-for-conservative-principles/#IDComment258793426</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Heated Exchange Between Paul And Gingrich Over Military Service</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/heated-exchange-between-paul-and-gingrich-over-military-service/#IDComment258734782</link>
<description>Most women don&amp;#039;t want to be led by women. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 18:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/heated-exchange-between-paul-and-gingrich-over-military-service/#IDComment258734782</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Heated Exchange Between Paul And Gingrich Over Military Service</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/heated-exchange-between-paul-and-gingrich-over-military-service/#IDComment258734258</link>
<description>It has already been addressed multiple times even from the last campaign and Ron Paul&amp;#039;s support grows even among minorities. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 18:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/heated-exchange-between-paul-and-gingrich-over-military-service/#IDComment258734258</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Faiz Shakir Admits: Language Used by Media Matters, Center for American Progress is &#039;Anti-Semitic&#039;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jpollak/2012/01/07/faiz-shakir-admits-language-used-by-media-matters-center-for-american-progress-is-anti-semitic/#IDComment258732627</link>
<description>So converts are the same as those who are racially Jews?  Nonsense.   </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 18:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jpollak/2012/01/07/faiz-shakir-admits-language-used-by-media-matters-center-for-american-progress-is-anti-semitic/#IDComment258732627</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : &#039;Meet The Press&#039; GOP Debate</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/live-stream-gop-debate-3/#IDComment258725947</link>
<description>Yes it is - the litmus tests for determining what kind you are dealing with seems to consistently be 1) support of Israel and/or 2) support of wars for Israel (Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, etc...)  Nothing else matters to these types.  They support Bush still because he licked the boots of Israel despite his explosion of  the size of government and supporting amnesty for illegals. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 18:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/live-stream-gop-debate-3/#IDComment258725947</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt Attacks Media, Obama Admin: &#039;Bigotry Question Goes Both Ways&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-attacks-media-obama-admin-bigotry-question-goes-both-ways/#IDComment258720811</link>
<description>Attack that commie George Bush who exploded the size of government. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 18:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-attacks-media-obama-admin-bigotry-question-goes-both-ways/#IDComment258720811</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Faiz Shakir Admits: Language Used by Media Matters, Center for American Progress is &#039;Anti-Semitic&#039;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jpollak/2012/01/07/faiz-shakir-admits-language-used-by-media-matters-center-for-american-progress-is-anti-semitic/#IDComment258719245</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;You&amp;#039;re using a condemnation of a particular group of liars in order to attack real Jews. &lt;/i&gt;  And the real Jews can&amp;#039;t possibly be the Khazars who converted after the Bible was written but are the imposters referenced.  &lt;i&gt;If you curse Israel, you&amp;#039;re cursed; if you bless Israel, you&amp;#039;re blessed. &lt;/i&gt;  So that goes for ANY country called Israel?  So if a bunch of Muslims called the place &amp;quot;Israel&amp;quot; to get free money you would continue sending it?  Don&amp;#039;t be daft.  &lt;i&gt;Everything is happening according to God&amp;#039;s timetable,&lt;/i&gt;  Incorrect, Israel was not to be reformed until after  the Second Coming, so the mere presence of that imposter state is delaying that.  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 18:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jpollak/2012/01/07/faiz-shakir-admits-language-used-by-media-matters-center-for-american-progress-is-anti-semitic/#IDComment258719245</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Iraq \&#039;unraveling\&#039; puts US civilians at risk: McCain</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.4fd0e1ade75599d2601eaf24fa6979b2.51&amp;show_article=1#IDComment258715407</link>
<description>Then get the civilian interlopers out of the country, dummy. They shouldn&amp;#039;t be there in the first place.  Or is this a prelude to a false-flag attack on Americans there to drag on this pointless war? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 17:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.4fd0e1ade75599d2601eaf24fa6979b2.51&amp;show_article=1#IDComment258715407</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Sununu Smacks Down &#039;Ridiculous&#039; MSNBC Panel On-Air </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/sununu-smacks-down-ridiculous-msnbc-panel-on-air/#IDComment258714772</link>
<description>And you are of the Zionist, which is fascist, point of view. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 17:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/sununu-smacks-down-ridiculous-msnbc-panel-on-air/#IDComment258714772</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum To Romney &#039;We Need Someone Who Will Fight For Conservative Principles&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-hammers-romney-for-not-running-for-reelection-in-massachusetts-we-need-someone-who-will-fight-for-conservative-principles/#IDComment258714178</link>
<description>No, it is naivety to believe these people&amp;#039;s patent lies instead of looking at their actions.  This is why those with no record, like Cain, are not to be trusted at all.  These people will say anything...other than the one with integrity - Ron Paul. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-hammers-romney-for-not-running-for-reelection-in-massachusetts-we-need-someone-who-will-fight-for-conservative-principles/#IDComment258714178</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : &#039;Meet The Press&#039; GOP Debate</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/live-stream-gop-debate-3/#IDComment258712736</link>
<description>People who watch tv all day and mindlessly consume liberal MSM values consider Ron Paul fringe.  Those who think for themselves seem to like Ron Paul. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 17:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/live-stream-gop-debate-3/#IDComment258712736</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : &#039;Meet The Press&#039; GOP Debate</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/live-stream-gop-debate-3/#IDComment258711675</link>
<description>The supporters of most candidates are very weak.  Ron Paul supporters are strong.  This time around we aren&amp;#039;t going to hold our noses and vote Republican.  So you want Obama - run anyone besides Ron Paul.  NO other candidate has a ground game - people going door to door - to speak of. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 17:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/live-stream-gop-debate-3/#IDComment258711675</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : &#039;Meet The Press&#039; GOP Debate</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/live-stream-gop-debate-3/#IDComment258710019</link>
<description>Same here - I don&amp;#039;t have a tv. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 17:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/live-stream-gop-debate-3/#IDComment258710019</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : &#039;Meet The Press&#039; GOP Debate</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/live-stream-gop-debate-3/#IDComment258709322</link>
<description>Did he side with Pelosi again?  He will, no matter what promises he makes now during the campaign. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 17:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/live-stream-gop-debate-3/#IDComment258709322</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : &#039;Meet The Press&#039; GOP Debate</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/live-stream-gop-debate-3/#IDComment258708692</link>
<description>Mitt is Obama - Obama is Mitt.   Choose a CFR candidate and you will get more of the same - more globalism and destruction of the US. Only choice is Ron Paul.  I would rather have someone who is more of a nativist but he is way better than anyone else and the only one who will easily defeat Obama. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 17:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/live-stream-gop-debate-3/#IDComment258708692</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum To Romney &#039;We Need Someone Who Will Fight For Conservative Principles&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-hammers-romney-for-not-running-for-reelection-in-massachusetts-we-need-someone-who-will-fight-for-conservative-principles/#IDComment258706384</link>
<description>Gay Rights and Abortion are not on the &amp;quot;Left/Right&amp;quot; paradigm.  Sanitarium is getting credit when it is not due him.  When it comes to big government being &amp;quot;left&amp;quot; then Sanitarium is definitely &amp;quot;left.&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 17:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-hammers-romney-for-not-running-for-reelection-in-massachusetts-we-need-someone-who-will-fight-for-conservative-principles/#IDComment258706384</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum To Romney &#039;We Need Someone Who Will Fight For Conservative Principles&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-hammers-romney-for-not-running-for-reelection-in-massachusetts-we-need-someone-who-will-fight-for-conservative-principles/#IDComment258705467</link>
<description>Hmmm, David Gregory as the inquisitor.  What tribe is he a member of? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 17:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-hammers-romney-for-not-running-for-reelection-in-massachusetts-we-need-someone-who-will-fight-for-conservative-principles/#IDComment258705467</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum To Romney &#039;We Need Someone Who Will Fight For Conservative Principles&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-hammers-romney-for-not-running-for-reelection-in-massachusetts-we-need-someone-who-will-fight-for-conservative-principles/#IDComment258705041</link>
<description>When will you people reject these plastic robots who keep spouting &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; and not meaning it?  Gingrich working with Pelosi.  Sanitarium working with a list of leftist Democrats....  You keep buying it so they keep up this charade. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 17:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-hammers-romney-for-not-running-for-reelection-in-massachusetts-we-need-someone-who-will-fight-for-conservative-principles/#IDComment258705041</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>