I went to Tampico IL once, to see his birthplace. I understand completely why he left. :D

To be fair, they kill babies rather indiscriminately--they'll never refuse a white girl who can pay the fee. It's a soft racism, like affirmative action.

By registering and posting here, the troll now has "associations" with us. Hope he doesn't want to go to any posh lefty cocktail parties.

Are you sure she's a Warming Believer and not one of us? I frequently remind Believers that "carbon dioxide emissions reduction begins at home" and the best way for them to decrease their "emissions" is to stop breathing.

No one ever takes me up on it. I question the sincerity of their beliefs.

Two things interest me about that "drug-addled welfare women NEED abortions and you're all meanies for not helping the babies they chose to have" argument. One, the existance of babies born addicted to drugs means their mothers made the choice the arguer doesn't approve of--to be pregant for nine months and then give birth. Two, no one ever cites stats about what percentage of women seeking abortions are addicted to drugs/alcohol or poor or uneducated vs. what percentage are sober but going to college/in college/starting a career/etc. The huge welfare-collecting class in this country indicates to me that most poor/uneducated women are choosing to have their babies. Unless these "pro-choice" advocates are really agitating for poor/drug-addicted women to be forced to abort (and I suspect they are), their argument makes no sense.

What's the ratio of drug-addicted women vs. healthy "career"/college-educated women seeking abortions?

Not equivalent. Dating services are not "advocacy" for "LGBT rights."

I've always wondered why hideously ugly women (personality or appearance) think they're going to need access to abortion.

I love when they report on dangerous, flesh-eating windchills with their ears exposed.

Retracto, the Correction Alpaca--my hat is off. You are beautiful. :)