IntenseDebate - GlennChatfield

13 years ago @ Big Government - The Real Failure at Re... · 1 reply · 0 points

That number is obviously your IQ.

13 years ago @ Big Government - The Real Failure at Re... · 0 replies · +1 points

Your ignorance is astounding! Let's try this one more time: NO ONE IN EITHER PLANE WAS IN DANGER, THE PLANES WERE NOT IN DANGER, EVERYTHING WAS PERFECTLY SAFE FOR THEM! THEY DO NOT NEED A CONTROLLER TO LAND! THEY HAD A RADAR CONTROLLER GETTING THEM THERE. PLANES LAND DAILY AT THOUSANDS OF AIRPORTS THAT HAVE NO CONTROLLERS. IT WAS NOT A SAFETY ISSUE!!!!! PLANES HAVE LANDED AFTER OUR TOWER WAS CLOSED BECAUSE THEY CAME IN LATE, AND NO ONE SAID THE TOWER HAS TO STAY OPEN FOR THEIR SAFETY.

Since there was no safety issue in THIS instance, the desire to crucify the guy is vicious, mean, draconian and sadistic. If someone used the same criteria for you when you screwed up something, you'd be whining and demanding government intervention!

13 years ago @ Big Government - The Real Failure at Re... · 2 replies · +1 points

No, you are the only stupid one here who is unable to comprehend the English language. From the very first post I never, ever said it was okay for him to sleep, so there is no need to produce a rule that says it is. That is where your first stupidity occurs because you refuse to read what is said - or else you are unable to comprehend - and you continually accuse me of saying it was okay for the guy to sleep.

From the very first all I have done was to defend against your Nazi-like draconian ideas of punishment. And yet you continue to go back to accusing me of defending the wrong behavior of the employee. This is your second stupidity.

You demonstrate a lack of intellectual capacity for discussions by not being able to understand the argument in the first place, not being able to follow a line of thought in the second place, and not being able to communicate without name-calling. I'll bet your everyday language consists of primarily profanity. No go back in your hole and take reading lessons.

13 years ago @ Big Government - The Real Failure at Re... · 3 replies · 0 points

You know all you do is use ad hominem attacks and you keep repeating the same accusation against me which was untrue the first time, and it is all based on your being so stupid as to not be able to read and comprehend the English language.

I never back-spinned. From the very first post - go back and read if you can - I only defended him against your harsh idea of appropriate punishment. I never said sleeping was okay, so there is no need to produce a rule that says it is so quit being stupid and get over it.

It is a policy that a controller be tested for drugs in any incident just to rule out that as an issue. This happens even if an airplane crashes and the controller had nothing to do with it.

13 years ago @ Big Government - The Real Failure at Re... · 4 replies · 0 points

Your stupidity is demonstrated double because you post the same things in two places, and in both places you demonstrate your inability to read and comprehend the English language (perhaps it isn't your native tongue?).

You want me to come up with some rule that says it was okay for the guy to sleep; why should I try to do something so stupid, especially when I have said he was wrong for sleeping - I never, ever defended his wrong-doing.

What I am challenging is your stupid, draconian beliefs as to proper punishment. And I'm sure you speak for the airline pilots - NOT!

13 years ago @ Big Government - The Real Failure at Re... · 5 replies · 0 points

You have just demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that you cannot understand English. How many times did I say that the guy was wrong in sleeping?!?!?!? I never said it was okay. The only thing I am disputing is your stupidity in demanding draconian punishment!

13 years ago @ Big Government - The Real Failure at Re... · 7 replies · 0 points

Hey, are you intellectually capable of discussion without name-calling? Apparently not.

13 years ago @ Big Government - The Real Failure at Re... · 0 replies · 0 points

I did answer the question and you have demonstrated your inability to read and understand English! I said the guy was wrong! To be wrong you have to violate a rule. HELLO!!!!

The discussion was NEVER about whether or not he was wrong - it was about your asinine idea to fine him and fire him!

13 years ago @ Big Government - The Real Failure at Re... · 6 replies · 0 points

You are making this into a situation which never happened. You build up what if's that never happened, and then want someone punished severely as if it did happen. How illogical can you get.

No, I said you were playing the Nazi by demanding draconian punishment for something that harmed no one. We aren't discussing whether what he did was wrong - I agree with that. What I am challenging is your asinine ideas that a firing and fine is applicable where nothing happened there was nothing unsafe. If you want that sort of punitive action, then you should have your driver's license removed for life for speeding which caused no harm.

13 years ago @ Big Government - The Real Failure at Re... · 10 replies · 0 points

Still resorting to name-calling; how intellectual! I never said the guy wasn't wrong - or perhaps you have just as much trouble reading and comprehending the English language as you do understanding what really took place. I also never said your questions were Nazi - I said your idea of punitive measures were like a Nazi -"You want to play the Nazi."

What is wrong is your desire for draconian punishment for something that caused no harm. How about the next time you bust a speed limit and don't hurt anyone we take away your driver's license for the rest of your life!

IntenseDebate Comment System

Description

Connect with GlennChatfield

People I'm following

GlennChatfield