Gino_DiSimone
17p4 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
13 years ago @ Tenth Amendment Center - Immigration, Foreign A... · 0 replies · +1 points
...received your email note and would love to have you. When I am Governor of NV, we will have a few surprises for our wayward fellows in the federal branches. The citizens Grand Jury will have the backing of State law enforcement. Best wishes!
Sincerely,
Gino DiSimone
Candidate, Governor of Nevada 2010, Independent non-partisan, GIN ! (Go Independent Nevada ! ) http://www.ginoforgov.com
13 years ago @ Tenth Amendment Center - Immigration, Foreign A... · 0 replies · +1 points
Sincerely,
Gino DiSimone
Candidate, Governor of Nevada 2010, Independent non-partisan, GIN ! (Go Independent Nevada ! ) http://www.ginoforgov.com
13 years ago @ Tenth Amendment Center - Immigration, Foreign A... · 2 replies · +2 points
This has been addressed previously in history and adopted by all States at the time. Thomas Jefferson made it pointedly clear in the Resolution of 1798. Please read it. Note the second resolution as follows (in part):
2. Resolved, That the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a power to punish treason, counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations, and no other crimes, whatsoever;
Upon reading the resolutions, it is pointedly clear: the Federal Government has no authority in this matter. The precedent is in place to substantiate it, and what more powerful precedent than one from an originator of our Declaration of Independence and Constitution themselves! Arizona is in complete accord with the Constitution as defined by the framers thereof.
Sincerely, Gino DiSimone Candidate, Governor of Nevada 2010 http://www.ginoforgov.com
775-544-2765
13 years ago @ Tenth Amendment Center - Immigration, Foreign A... · 2 replies · +2 points
Dear Robert Natelson,
I read your article entitled, "Immigration, Foreign Affairs and the Constitution" published in the Tenth Amendment Center online.
Specifically regarding Immigration, you are not correct. Here is why:
1. Legal immigration, very reasonably falls under naturalization as you describe. No problem here and I would agree with your post in all aspects.
2. Illegal immigration is not defined in the Constitution and thereby is absolutely a 10th Amendment right of the States. Your post alludes to the Federal Government potentially having some level of authority. This is absolutely incorrect!
Indeed, addressing illegal immigration, putting laws in place governing them, putting force in place to arrest them and protections against them, and any other measure towards them is the issue at hand (Arizona Immigration Law).
...see part 2...