IntenseDebate - GinaMBurgess

14 years ago @ ~ Angry White Boy ~ - Schrader May Still Hav... · 0 replies · +1 points

@ Dean Robinson: Thank you for your support. I appreciate your efforts. :-)

14 years ago @ ~ Angry White Boy ~ - Schrader May Still Hav... · 0 replies · +1 points

@ Gad-Fly: I agree with you....writing in the third person does sound a bit narcisstic. What you don't realize is the above was sent out as an electronic news release to keep the media updated. I use the third person to make it easier for the media to simply copy and paste if they so choose.

I regret that you, personally, don't have an interest in the above update concerning Schrader. I pity the fact that you can only focus on the flaws of an unconventional candidate and not on the bigger issue that is being personified by a flawed candidate. As Mr. Robinson so eloquently and succinctly put it...this is not about Schrader, this is about "Allen County Election Board is acting outside of law or regulation. The ACEB has no right to remove Schrader from the ballot. The Allen County Democrat Party has no right to put another candidate on the ballot."

14 years ago @ ~ Angry White Boy ~ - Why You Should Care th... · 0 replies · +1 points

In the meantime, you can make it more difficult on Schrader by making sure the other legitimate Democratic candidates for city-council at-large run a good campaign. You can target Schrader and point out all of his flaws....goodness know, you’re good at that. (Btw, that was intended as a compliment.) Goodness knows, Schrader has given you a plethora of things to work with here.

14 years ago @ ~ Angry White Boy ~ - Why You Should Care th... · 1 reply · +1 points

You see, Kevin, I think in the end, I believe individual members of the ACEB will do the right thing and let voters in November decide if Schrader deserves to be elected or not. My only hope is that they, the ACEB, do the right thing...because it’s the right thing to do. Individually, I believe that each member of the ACEB is a good, hard-working, ethically-bound individual. I hope they prove me right!

14 years ago @ ~ Angry White Boy ~ - Why You Should Care th... · 2 replies · +1 points

Also, do you really think the individual members of the ACEB, especially those with professional legal licenses such as Zack Klutz, Mark GiaQuinta and Andrew Boxberger, are going to risk a complaint launched against them for being dishonest to the public, commencing an investigation by the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission (http://www.in.gov/judiciary/discipline/complaining.html). Do you have any idea what that could do to these guys??? Sure, in one case, such an inquiry or investigation may only lead to an increase in the amount he has to pay for professional liability. But for one or more of them, such an investigation could lead to disciplinary action, perhaps even suspension. I just can’t fathom they would be willing to risk something like that.....for someone like Schrader.

14 years ago @ ~ Angry White Boy ~ - Why You Should Care th... · 3 replies · +2 points

Regarding Schrader not being on the ballot.....Kevin, first, I don't believe you have the authority to speak on behalf of the ACEB. The ACEB may have accepted a Declaration of Nomination from the ACDP asking that Guido be placed on the ballot. However, the ACEB can not legally place Guido on the ballot until the Court's create a vacancy. Doing so is election tampering. Election tampering has consequences to the ACEB, its individual members and those acting as individual members. The ACEB was advised of proper procedure by the Indiana Election Commission. The proper procedure, which is clearly outlined in Title 3 of the Indiana Code, is known by the ACDP, as contained in their lawsuit of Bynum v Schrader....which, by the way, is a public record that ACEB Lisbeth Borgmann, as Clerk of Courts, has access to and is aware of. At this point, there is really no way the ACEB can say...”We didn’t know what the procedure was?”

14 years ago @ ~ Angry White Boy ~ - Why You Should Care th... · 0 replies · +1 points

The above shared facts came from the Advance Indiana blog (www.advanceindiana.com), which is written by an Indiana attorney. This particular case was part of an article on why the legal case against Indiana Secretary of State, as it pertained to White’s residency, was as week as the case against Schrader. Again, feel free to confirm the above by reading the article yourself. Here’s the link: http://advanceindiana.blogspot.com/2011/06/matter...

14 years ago @ ~ Angry White Boy ~ - Why You Should Care th... · 1 reply · +1 points

Don’t believe me...or don’t want to believe me....read the case for yourself. Here’s a link: http://in.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.as...

14 years ago @ ~ Angry White Boy ~ - Why You Should Care th... · 2 replies · +1 points

It was undisputed that Evrard had not lived in Perry County for the previous 16 years until he established a permanent residence there in July, 1970 after.....AFTER....... he had already won nomination in the May, 1970 primary for circuit court judge. Nonetheless, the Indiana Supreme Court found that the Evrards had established enough intent to establish a voting residence in Perry County to overcome the allegation Evrard had filed false statements about his residency when he registered to vote in Perry County, filed a statement of candidacy and cast a vote in the May primary election.

14 years ago @ ~ Angry White Boy ~ - Why You Should Care th... · 3 replies · +1 points

In 1970, David Evrard and his wife lived in Virginia where he worked as a patent lawyer for the U.S Department of Justice. Upon learning that the incumbent circuit court judge in Perry County planned to retire, Evrard announced his candidacy and filed paperwork to run in the May primary election for the circuit court judge position as a Democrat. He and his wife began the process of moving back to Perry County; however, it is undisputed that the couple continued to maintain their Virginia residence, Evrard continued to be employed by the federal government, their children continued to attend school in Virginia and the couple both held driver's licenses issued by the state of Virginia. The Evrards registered to vote at David's parent's house until the couple were able to sell their home and move back to Perry County later in the year after he had already won the May primary election and both he and his wife had cast votes in the May primary election.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with GinaMBurgess

People I'm following

GinaMBurgess