Fourth_Stooge
69p70 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
14 years ago @ Breitbart.com - US Senate Democrats pi... · 1 reply · +10 points
14 years ago @ Big Government - A Bit-Less-than-Full F... · 0 replies · +3 points
Sincerely,
Jimmy Carter, Herbert Hoover and George Bush
No Longer the Worst Presidents (not by a long shot)
14 years ago @ Breitbart.com - S&P downgrades US cred... · 0 replies · +3 points
14 years ago @ Big Government - Tea Party Lawmakers Ar... · 2 replies · +18 points
An economy based on the debt rating of the federal government is inherently a lie. Where is it written that the federal government even needs to have debt. Private lenders and borrowers should be left to their own devices--not basing their transactions on competing with T-Bills.
Let it crash. Make the government offer federal land or other property as collateral for debt.
14 years ago @ Big Government - Stengel-gate Spreads: ... · 0 replies · +5 points
Anything that interferes with the rights to taxation, abortion and anal sex is by definition illegal and therefore unconstitutional. It's either the 6th, 18th or 22nd amendment that says so (or probably all 3 when you really think about it).
14 years ago @ Big Government - Obama Political Adviso... · 1 reply · +13 points
Just take 40% off the top, plus a 12% surchage, then tack on a 4.3% use tax, add on a 12% highway robbery tax (which would be lower than capital gains), throw in an excise tax of 7.28%, and top it off with another 9.4% as a processing fee. That would leave about 15% for union bosses to live off of.
It wouldn't leave much for Democratic kickbac...I mean political donations.
14 years ago @ Big Journalism - David Axelrod: Lincoln... · 2 replies · +9 points
He failed. And we have to pick up the check.
That's the story that should be told now til election day. Any other story is a useless distratction.
14 years ago @ Big Government - Dems Gone Wild: Rep. A... · 0 replies · +28 points
15 years ago @ Big Journalism - Just How Large Was the... · 0 replies · +4 points
These are pictures of the "over one million attendees" for the inauguration (http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/01/the_inauguration_of_president.html). No doubt very impressive for January in Washington. The leaves are not on the trees and you can see no one is standing under the trees. The area for the inauguration was much narrower and there were large open spaces in the crowd. On Saturday most folks were actually under the trees and packed very tightly.
So contrast the pictures of the inauguration with the crowd at Saturday's rally. There were more people there on Saturday. I'm not suggesting it was over a million but it was definitely more than the inauguration.
15 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - Fringe Group? National... · 0 replies · +2 points
I was there. People were packed in from Independence Avenue all the way to the pond on the other side of the Reflecting Pool and from the Lincoln Memorial to the Washington Monument. People were standing shoulder to shoulder. The Metro was overwhelmed--no way could a crowd of 78,000 to 98,000 even come close to doing that. I parked at a Metro stop that had parking for over 5,000 cars. It was full at 7:00 AM.
There simply has not been a larger crowd on the mall in the past 30-40 years. There is no arguing about it. It is a fact. All one has to do is compare the aerial photos. Larger than the Million Man March? Definitely. Larger than the Obama Inauguration? Absolutely. The basic math is undeniable when one compares the events. This event covered more square footage with more people per square foot. More square footage plus higher density equals larger crowd.
There are no emotions that negate the numbers. There is no New Math that reduces the multitude.