Actually, there were no equipment requirements until DOMA came along and DOMA is unconstitutional. Oh, but I forgot, you don't care about the facts.

Yeah, some talking snake giving apples away...

Keep your delusions to yourself, please.

"They imply that we are not smart enough to understand the situation."

They definitely have you there, John. No new law was made. The IASC simply stated that Iowa marriage benefits have to be afforded all citizens equally regardless of what equipment their spouse has.

Wow, I thought they taught respect in the military...

No, not all 600 million. But a large minority of that 600 million. I mean, from my experience it pretty well represents mormons and evangelicals.

No, thanks. I also don't think that that is what anyone is advocating. You probably shouldn't lie so much.

You probably shouldn't assume other people's position, twat. You're wrong, by the way. I may feel that there are better ways to deal with illegal immigration than going after the individual, however.

It isn't my job to find a source to support your argument, it is yours. So, if wiki is the only source you can find for that information and wiki isn't a credible source, what do you think that says about your argument?

A lesson in vocabulary because you are too simple to learn it yourself: Phobic is an irrational fear of something. Thus, you calling people "libbyphodic" is saying they have an irrational fear of "libbys". If anyone could be considered "libbyphobic" it would be all of the far right loons that post on these boards. Again, you should probably learn what a word means before you start throwing it around.

Wow, you sit there and complain about someone's source and turn around and use wiki? Have you ever learned what a credible source truly is?