Sounds like you're engaging in politically-motivated criticism of Breitbart's site.

What's the difference between "politically-motivated criticism" and the plain sort of criticism? If I say "I think it's weird that drones are used to bomb targets in the AfPak region, and those "targets" are not being Mirandized, but are prejudged as guilty and are therefore bombed, while KSM gets a lawyer and Abdulmutallab was Mirandized," is that just criticism, or is it "politically-motivated criticism"?

And if it's "politically motivated" just because the target of criticism thinks that the critic is of another party, that's just a weak excuse to be thin-skinned and marginalize critics who may have valid opinions.

Gee, why are they the worst when liberals keep pouring money into them and the teachers are so well-compensated?

Was that on the Caucasian album?

Is the MARTA acronym waggily now standing for "Moving ASIANS Rapidly Through Atlanta"?

It's "Progressive" V. "non-Progressive".

Perhaps you'd like to list for us all the "grassroots" movements you consider to be "legitimate". You know, so that we can tell if we're being faked-out or not.

Right? Can you imagine doctors and nurses practicing negligently, high on drugs or worse, being protected from firing due to "doctor shortages", or protected from malpractice thanks to some POS legislation designed to protect the bloated health-care system?
NO F'ING THANK YOU.

You can fight it. It'll take 2 years or so and a good lawyer but you can challenge it all under religious freedom. It has been done.

Why should teachers have protections that other types of employees (lab technicians, salespeople, painters) do not?
Why are teachers special?