<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/686634</link>
		<description>Comments by DaveInNH</description>
<item>
<title>Big Peace : Obama&#039;s Pentagon: &#039;Too Many Whites, Men Leading Military&#039;</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2011/03/08/obamas-pentagon-too-many-whites-men-leading-military/#IDComment133526679</link>
<description>You are not alone. People are waking up. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Mar 2011 05:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2011/03/08/obamas-pentagon-too-many-whites-men-leading-military/#IDComment133526679</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Obama&#039;s Pentagon: &#039;Too Many Whites, Men Leading Military&#039;</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2011/03/08/obamas-pentagon-too-many-whites-men-leading-military/#IDComment133526042</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s been entrenched (no pun intended) for years, and it ain&amp;#039;t going anywhere anytime soon. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Mar 2011 05:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2011/03/08/obamas-pentagon-too-many-whites-men-leading-military/#IDComment133526042</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Obama&#039;s Pentagon: &#039;Too Many Whites, Men Leading Military&#039;</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2011/03/08/obamas-pentagon-too-many-whites-men-leading-military/#IDComment133525436</link>
<description>Bingo! Well said. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Mar 2011 05:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2011/03/08/obamas-pentagon-too-many-whites-men-leading-military/#IDComment133525436</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Obama&#039;s Pentagon: &#039;Too Many Whites, Men Leading Military&#039;</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2011/03/08/obamas-pentagon-too-many-whites-men-leading-military/#IDComment133509574</link>
<description>I served in the US Army from 1987 to 1994. One of the many factors that led to my decision to leave was the fact that , even then, political correctness had pervaded the military and, as a white male, I was treated like a second class citizen, and all indicators were that it was only going to get worse.  My ASVAB scores qualified me for any MOS, and I wound up with 2 of them in completely different fields - aviation and MI. I graduated at or near the top of every military training course I attended, including the Defense Language Institute. My goal  isn&amp;#039;t to impress - just to demonstrate that I wasn&amp;#039;t some flunky who couldn&amp;#039;t compete and holds a grudge against the military. I was able to overcome any obstacle that was put in front of me, but a series of experiences told me that it was time to leave. The last 2 were the straws that broke the proverbial camel&amp;#039;s back. The first was when a friend and coworker was drummed out of the Army when 2 pre-teen dependents accused him of calling them a racial epithet. He asked them to leave an area they weren&amp;#039;t supposed to be in, and they told their mother that he told them they weren&amp;#039;t allowed to be there because they were ni. . . s. On the uncorroborated word of two preteens, a soldier with over $1 million dollars worth of training was tossed out. The second intolerable event was being asked to fill in for our company&amp;#039;s PAC sergeant while she went out on maternity leave. It was bed enough that she had spent the previous 8 months dodging every duty possible, but now she was going to get 2 months of maternity leave for free! To add insult to injury, the little darling she was about to squeeze out was number FIVE. I did the math and figured out that in this woman&amp;#039;s ten year career, she had spent five full years on restricted duty and maternity leave! Despite that fact, she had still promoted at the pace of her cohort. Two months later, I took advantage of an opportunity and got he hell out.  The military brass seems all too willing to sew the seeds of the military&amp;#039;s own destruction. They looked the other way when a muslim major freely expressed his hatred for the United States, had regular contact with a known terrorist, and they allowed him to kill 13 fellow soldiers and injure 32 others. They&amp;#039;ve destroyed the career of a cream-of-the-crop naval aviator/aircraft carrier commander because he made &amp;#039;anti-homosexual&amp;#039; comments six years before DADT was repealed; and they&amp;#039;ve prosecuted honorable men for carrying out their duty to protect and defend themselves and their comrades. If it isn&amp;#039;t clear that the military is hell bent on its own destruction, you just aren&amp;#039;t paying attention. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Mar 2011 03:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2011/03/08/obamas-pentagon-too-many-whites-men-leading-military/#IDComment133509574</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : ABC News Staffer Warns GOP Against ObamaCare Repeal</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/abc-news-staffer-warns-gop-against-obamacare-repeal/#IDComment119103781</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;&amp;quot;Put it this way, if the DON&amp;#039;T repeal nobamacare, the newly elected will find themselves out of a job. The Republicans were elected by a landslide on their promises to do just this---get rid of the socialism that this administration and the dumbokrauts have let slip in the door.&amp;quot; &lt;/i&gt;  The problem is, the Republicans knew they wouldn&amp;#039;t have enough votes to repeal Obamacare, even after the mid-term elections. So, by telling everyone that they were going to repeal it between now and 2012, they made a promise that they could not keep. They screwed themselves, and us, for the 2012 elections. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Jan 2011 01:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/abc-news-staffer-warns-gop-against-obamacare-repeal/#IDComment119103781</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : ABC News Staffer Warns GOP Against ObamaCare Repeal</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/abc-news-staffer-warns-gop-against-obamacare-repeal/#IDComment119091942</link>
<description>I like it - force the Dems to vote for repeal. That MAY be possible. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Jan 2011 23:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/abc-news-staffer-warns-gop-against-obamacare-repeal/#IDComment119091942</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : ABC News Staffer Warns GOP Against ObamaCare Repeal</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/abc-news-staffer-warns-gop-against-obamacare-repeal/#IDComment119091618</link>
<description>But defunding isn&amp;#039;t repeal. All defunding will do is leave the legislation in place until the next time the liberals get back into power - then we&amp;#039;re screwed. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Jan 2011 23:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/abc-news-staffer-warns-gop-against-obamacare-repeal/#IDComment119091618</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : ABC News Staffer Warns GOP Against ObamaCare Repeal</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/abc-news-staffer-warns-gop-against-obamacare-repeal/#IDComment119091244</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;d love for them to repeal Obamacare, but do the Republicans even have the votes needed to repeal it? It&amp;#039;s been a long time since my American Government class, but I thought it required a super-majority in both the house and senate to repeal a federal law. Since they don&amp;#039;t have the required votes, and won&amp;#039;t until at least January, 2013 (if they don&amp;#039;t screw the pooch between now and then), I think all this talk of repeal has been nothing more than a bunch of hot air.  Here&amp;#039;s how I see this whole thing playing out. The vast majority of sitting Republican lawmakers have absolutely no intention of curbing their spending, but they were forced to talk the talk because much of the American electorate had reached their limit with all the fraud, waste, and abuse by the government. They modified their rhetoric and started all this talk of repeal, even though they all knew that the likelihood of being able to do so (even after the mid-term elections) was going to be almost nil. At the same time, they started to talk about de-funding the provisions of Obamacare so they would have a defensible fall-back position when the American public finally figures out that repeal is all but impossible. Assuming they do de-fund it, eventually the liberals will regain control of the government and they will forget to de-fund it, and the American people will be on the hook to provide all the layabouts with &amp;#039;free&amp;#039; health care.   I hate to say it, folks, but greed and corruption on the part of politicians has combined with sloth and stupidity on the part of the majority of the American people to drive a stake through the heart of the greatest nation the world has ever known. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Jan 2011 23:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/abc-news-staffer-warns-gop-against-obamacare-repeal/#IDComment119091244</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Nuclear treaty \&#039;goes easy on Russia\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.cdc63f449543115516a6ee1f2c569704.171&amp;show_article=1#IDComment118295521</link>
<description>Or, maybe, in the event of attack, he&amp;#039;ll open his filthy pie hole and envelope the entire country in an impenetrable cloud of BS. Seems to confuse a lot of people, so why not missiles? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 22:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.cdc63f449543115516a6ee1f2c569704.171&amp;show_article=1#IDComment118295521</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Nuclear treaty \&#039;goes easy on Russia\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.cdc63f449543115516a6ee1f2c569704.171&amp;show_article=1#IDComment118294719</link>
<description>Why don&amp;#039;t people understand that? The Russians would NEVER sign or abide by a treaty that they thought would somehow limit their options. I&amp;#039;m afraid the idiots are in charge. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 22:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.cdc63f449543115516a6ee1f2c569704.171&amp;show_article=1#IDComment118294719</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Nuclear treaty \&#039;goes easy on Russia\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.cdc63f449543115516a6ee1f2c569704.171&amp;show_article=1#IDComment118294220</link>
<description>If you want to learn how conscientious the Russians are about abiding by the treaties they sign, Google Dr. Ken Alibek. Better yet, read his book, &amp;quot;&lt;i&gt;Biohazard: The Chilling True Story of the Largest Covert Biological Weapons Program in the World - Told from Inside by the Man Who Ran It&lt;/i&gt;.&amp;quot; The WIkipedia article on him tries to gloss over the fact that he was, at one time, in charge of the Soviet&amp;#039;s biological weapons program - years after Soviets and Americans had signed the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention, which outlawed the production, stockpiling, or use of bio-weapons. The Americans lived up to their end of the bargain, destroying their stockpiles and destroying their production facilities. The Soviets, on the other hand, continued to maintain their stockpiles and improve their production facilities, even though they were subject to random inspections by American observers. They cannot be trusted, and anyone who does trust them is nothing more than a useful idiot.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 22:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.cdc63f449543115516a6ee1f2c569704.171&amp;show_article=1#IDComment118294220</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Govt \&#039;creating vast domestic snooping machine\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.35fe9afbf5c0253f885080ba82e9784c.781&amp;show_article=1#IDComment117048335</link>
<description>The Soviets had the NKVD, the Nazis had the Gestapo, and the East Germans had the Stasi. Now, years after those governments were relegated to the dust bin of history and the truly horrific actions of those state-run &amp;#039;security&amp;#039; forces exposed, our government has gifted us with the Department of Homeland Security.  It seems that we are, indeed, doomed to repeat history.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.35fe9afbf5c0253f885080ba82e9784c.781&amp;show_article=1#IDComment117048335</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Painting of dead Mandela draws outrage in S.Africa</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.cf9f10c3711ed1f86d1a98e8bddbd2c9.361&amp;show_article=1#IDComment85968081</link>
<description>I followed the link and liked what I saw. Thanks for the suggestion. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.cf9f10c3711ed1f86d1a98e8bddbd2c9.361&amp;show_article=1#IDComment85968081</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Painting of dead Mandela draws outrage in S.Africa</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.cf9f10c3711ed1f86d1a98e8bddbd2c9.361&amp;show_article=1#IDComment85957070</link>
<description>&amp;quot;The ANC called the painting &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot; and criticised the artist for depicting Mandela as dead, saying it was considered an act of witchcraft in African society.&amp;quot;    This statement tells me two things. One, just like liberal Americans, South Africans have learned to throw out the race card whenever they encounter something they don&amp;#039;t like or agree with; and two, freedom of speech and primitive beliefs don&amp;#039;t mix well. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 14:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.cf9f10c3711ed1f86d1a98e8bddbd2c9.361&amp;show_article=1#IDComment85957070</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Foes of tea party movement to infiltrate rallies</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9F1PU2O0&show_article=1#IDComment67574232</link>
<description>The longer these boobs are in charge, the more similarities I can see between them and the NAZI party of 1930&amp;#039;s Germany. I wake up each day expecting to see some kind of modern day, American version of the Reichstag fire.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 02:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9F1PU2O0&show_article=1#IDComment67574232</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Foes of tea party movement to infiltrate rallies</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9F1PU2O0&show_article=1#IDComment67569166</link>
<description>By reading some of the threads on Mr. Levin&amp;#039;s site, it doesn&amp;#039;t appear that his movement is gaining much traction. Any idiot can register a domain name and throw up a site, but it&amp;#039;s the quality of the movement that dictates the type of person who&amp;#039;s willing to be affiliated with it. Mr. Levin should have saved his money, time, and effort. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 01:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9F1PU2O0&show_article=1#IDComment67569166</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Black conservative tea party backers take heat</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9ETR1380&show_article=1#IDComment66286554</link>
<description>Toe the party line or you&amp;#039;re an Uncle Tom!  I&amp;#039;ve said for years that the United States doesn&amp;#039;t have a race problem, we&amp;#039;ve got a culture problem. Blacks who think for themselves and refuse to become slaves to liberal social policies are absolutely HATED by liberals of all colors. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9ETR1380&show_article=1#IDComment66286554</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Alaska&#039;s News and Information on CBS Channel 11 News - KTVA : Don Young: Global warming is a &quot;Scam&quot; - KTVA</title>
<link>http://www.ktva.com/ci_14434574#IDComment58001457</link>
<description>Flat Earthers? Are you suggesting that global warming (or whatever it&amp;#039;s being called these days) is a scientific fact? I doubt you&amp;#039;ll understand this article, but read it anyway &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.michaelcrichton.net\/speech-alienscauseglobalwarming.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Aliens are to blame for global warming&lt;/a&gt;.  The flat Earth theory was proven incorrect after European explorers circumnavigated the globe. The scientific evidence no longer supported the theory. If you want to prove global warming is, indeed taking place and is influenced by human activities, all you have to do is produce the data they used to reach their conclusions. That&amp;#039;s all! The data will be peer reviewed, and the scientific community will debate the merits of the theory.  The &amp;#039;scientists&amp;#039; who were the loudest supporters of AGW refused to allow their data to be peer reviewed, and they&amp;#039;ve recently admitted that they doctored the data their theory was based on. They failed to prove their case. If you are too stupid to know about the basics of the scientific method, then you probably shouldn&amp;#039;t be calling too many names. Anyone who buys into the AGW hysteria at this point is criminally STUPID and probably mentally ill to boot. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.ktva.com/ci_14434574#IDComment58001457</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Alaska&#039;s News and Information on CBS Channel 11 News - KTVA : Don Young: Global warming is a &quot;Scam&quot; - KTVA</title>
<link>http://www.ktva.com/ci_14434574#IDComment57987667</link>
<description>The late Michael Crichton, author of Jurassic Park and others, gave a fantastic speech about global warming. If you have a few minutes and you really want to learn how to disarm these global warming morons who claim that you can&amp;#039;t argue with the science, check it out: &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.michaelcrichton.net\/speech-alienscauseglobalwarming.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Crichton Speech&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.ktva.com/ci_14434574#IDComment57987667</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>