Thanks for making those emails public. It really bothers me to see people like Norris equate the content of a film like Loose Change with Nazism, racism etc. This is a tactic that has become common for those who defend the official conspiracy theory and is used to place those who question it in a defensive posture. Since when are conspiracy theories unacceptable? Prosecuting attornies offer nothing but conspiracy theories to juries, then once evidence is examined and a verdict is reached, the conspiracy theories become known as truth. Why is examination of the evidence not allowed when it comes to 911? Never is a calm debate about the points that the film makes undertaken. A lawyer, of all people, should be able to analyze data and evidence and come to a rational conclusion as would a scientist.

So to go from this weak attack on Mark's freedom to distribute a dissenting film by Norris to a weak SEC case with him as the attacker once again would appear to be more than a strong coincidence.