"the city remains contested ground"? What an ignorant fool he is. What should be noted is that the PLO was formed before 1967, and initially it did focus on cities like Tel Aviv. After 1967, Arafat chose to focus on the 'occupied territories' as a PR move, but apparently he needn't have bothered.

Fonda, Glover et al should be ashamed of their ignorance.

You raised the point that hit me as well. I wonder how much this is a response to recent Fatah efforts to appeal more to the Islamist crowd. The fact is that there have been blurred lines between the two entities for some time, certainly on the lower- and mid-level tiers of Fatah.

Hasan was allowed to continue in the military despite grave questions out of a perverted desire for 'diversity.' In the wake of his despicable attack, I propose that the administration consider that the military's true diversity is represented by those who fell before his cowardly rampage.

Much as I enjoyed the original Independence Day, if this one was 'inspired' by the current administration, I have no interest in seeing it. Besides, Emmerich's last few movies have been at best marginally watchable.

Ah Chavez. Always good for a counterfactual rant. Unsurprisingly, the definition of 'genocide' is yet another word he doesn't seem to know, much like 'human rights,' 'open elections,' and 'democracy.'

Excellent news - there is a serious (and growing) need for exactly such a site.

It's not surprising that left-wing pirates would like to excuse their actions. Some likely don't even realize that they're flouting the Constitution itself, while others would pride themselves on that very fact.

Now, as anyone familiar with Constitutional history knows, The Federalist ensured the ratification of the Constitution. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay went into exacting detail in arguing on behalf of various clauses.

So what did they say about the law of copyright? In The Federalist #43, Madison said that "The utility of this power will scarcely be questioned. The copy-right of authors has been solemnly adjudged in Great Britain, to be a right at common law. The right to useful inventions, seems with equal reason to belong to the inventors. The public good fully coincides in both cases with the claims of individuals..."

So my open question to the likes of Masnick and Tenenbaum is, do you need to be 'convinced' about the rest of the Constitution, or just the parts of which you're woefully ignorant?

I had the opportunity to meet and speak with him a few years ago, and he is even more engaging and impressive in person than in his stirring speeches.

Idiot producers pull nonsense like this and then wonder why sales go down...

Well, you convinced me to start watching The Wanted. Bravo!