CompFedUp

CompFedUp

98p

1,913 comments posted · 1 followers · following 0

3 hours ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Congressman admits \'o... · 0 replies · -4 points

Now, if the O&G-owned and Koch-owned Congresscritters and others would back off on their favorite climate scientist targets.

What say you, rejectionists?

6 hours ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Duane Haugen: Science,... · 0 replies · +2 points

Politics doesn't determine what is real and what is not.

Suppose all the "alarmist activist Marxist frauds" scientists had never existed. Al Gore, too.

What would be different about the climate system? Not a single thing.

9 hours ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Duane Haugen: Science,... · 5 replies · +1 points

Ahhhh, no. It's wrong to interrogate Pielke for his funding just as it was **wrong*** for Inhofe/Cuccinelli/Rohrabacher to interrogate and attack numerous climate scientists.

The double standard being applied by the rejectionists is obvious.

10 hours ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Duane Haugen: Science,... · 7 replies · +1 points

Look into Mark Steyn comparing Michael Mann to Jerry Sandusky.

Or Rush Limbaugh going after Katharine Hayhoe.

Or James Inhofe and his climate scientist "hit list".

Or Ken Cuccinelli's McCarthy-ite witch hunt against Mann.

Or the criminally hacked emails.

Where were your demands that scientists be protected from ideologically-based attack during those incidents?

Nowhere.

1 day ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Quentin M. McKenna: Ca... · 0 replies · +1 points

Define "match".

1 day ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Boulder Valley parents... · 0 replies · +3 points

Of course he does, because all he does is repeat anti-teacher's-unions boilerplate rhetoric.

Given doctrinaire libertarians' hatred of unions, it's expected and boring.

2 days ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Quentin M. McKenna: Ca... · 0 replies · +1 points

Sigh. Despite all your attacks on science, it's clear you have no clue as to how science works.

Science doesn't deal in "proof", like in court.

Explain the divergence:


2 days ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Quentin M. McKenna: Ca... · 0 replies · +2 points

True, I should have said "epsilon". My apologies.

2 days ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Quentin M. McKenna: Ca... · 0 replies · +2 points

Perhaps you can explain (since BoulderNative cannot) the simultaneous existence of hopelessly manipulated surface temperature analyses and the so-called "pause".

Why would climate scientists do that?

Ideas?

PS - Define "matching". What would you require of climate models to accept their utility?