thanks... it was the perfect reference...i made my report well.. tanxx
The problem with many social networks are that they hover between 1 % and 5 to 6% with no hope of reaching the 19%. "Walking Dead" so to say!
A proportion of the people emerging from these world-leading research groups will be entrepreneurs. They will have grown attached to the geographic location where they lived while in their academic careers, and their network will also be based around the University. Start-ups will begin to spring-up, and forward-looking VCs will engage with the Universities to help create new entrepreneurs.
Sure we can see the signs, try n focus in the distance and foresee where we're going with this, try and put our minds back to pre-widgets and grasp some other similiar 'framework' that kinda worked b4...
Now, with the help of an extremely successful CEO, (let's call him Yogi) I am seeing the truth and realizing that company founders often have little reason to assume that they will make successful CEO's, lead to liquidity and further on. It seems the role of the founder and the role of a CEO are very distinct and different jobs, both of which are unlikely to be done well by one same person.
I found that rather than read about data sets and the above mentioned conclusions I was far more interested in content that focused on "with hindsight, I would have rather done x". I was also interested in the misery loves company concept - since I have failed I'd rather read about other failures, than read about the guy (or the firm) that made it.
Makes the most sense. Excellent. Put it straight up for all arm-chair strategists too see
The problem with many social networks are that they hover between 1 % and 5 to 6% with no hope of reaching the 19%. "Walking Dead" so to say!
It may be that you have rediscovered something already well!
It may be that you have rediscovered something already well
studied in the literature of organizational behavior and
public administration, and I do not know those fields well
enough to sa