Does Bill Clinton really want this fight? Here is what his own party wrote about him:

JOINT RESOLUTION:

It is the Sense of the Congress that -

On January 20, 1993, William Jefferson Clinton took the oath, prescribed by the Constitution of the United States, faithfully to execute the Office of President; implicit in that oath is the obligation that the President set an example of high moral standards and conduct himself in a manner that fosters respect for the truth; and William Jefferson Clinton has egregiously failed in this obligation, and through his actions has violated the trust of the American people, lessened their esteem for the office of the President and dishonored the office which they have entrusted to him,

Be it resolved that:
1. The President made false statements concerning his reprehensible conduct with a subordinate;
2. The President wrongly took steps to delay discovery of the truth;
3. No person is above the law, and the President remains subject to criminal and civil penalties for this conduct;
4. William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States, by his conduct has brought upon himself and fully deserves the censure and condemnation of the American people and the Congress; and by his signature on this Joint Resolution, the President acknowledges this censure.

Better put some ice on that...

Oh, and by the way, Malcolm Ritter has put together a most vicious piece of invective here. Casting your opponents as psychologically inferior is the lowest form of political attack method available. It speaks to the sheer desperation of the Warmists in their dying throes.

It’s only when the empire’s breaking That you see their teeth (Al Stewart – “Rain Barrel”)

So, if you are a AGW skeptic and have felt bullied, put down, or belittled, rest assured that this farce is now coming to an abrupt end. The fraud perpetrated by the Warmists will far exceed the UN's Oil for Food scandal, and there may yet be tantalizing tidbits of evidence coming to us from those servers in Russia.

Drip, drip, drip...

Psychologically, I have trouble accepting the fraudulent manipulation of data sets, the conspiracies to shield data from FOIA requests, the black-balling of scientists trying to present contrary data, and the usage of a computer model deliberately hacked to produce a specific answer.

Maybe I have a latent conflict with my mother that stops me from just accepting the documented fraud in New Zealand, and the cherry-picked temperature monitors in Mother Russia.

Perhaps if my psyche were developed to a higher level, I'd be able to accept used cars salesman posing as scientists committing the most serious case of fraud ever committed by scientists. Ever.