When the H*** are the people who support our current president going to wake up and see this guy isn't fit to be commander in chief? It's not his fault; he's a community organizer.
That being said somebody's got to remind him men are dying while he try's to figure out a way to placate the dangerous whack jobs on the extreme left, and prevent them from staging a coup; when he does the right thing in Afghanistan. What happened to what he said when he asked people to vote him where he said this is the war we need to fight.
You have two choices mr president fight, or pull these good men out NOW.

Money needs to be put into this for something to replace the CH-53 for heavy lift, with improved survivability. But keep the bells and whistles to a minimum so it isn't cost prohibitive.

Yeah I remember when we sold most of our consumer electronics companies and or their patents to the Jap's and Korean's. Now they're building most of the ships and heavy equipment. Not much left for us.

He needs the prompter for a lot of things but cutting programs that don't involve giving someone something for nothing easy for this bunch to cut.

Maybe, but remember that was all funded in the last administration. When this administration has to come up with trillions for all the give aways space will be on the chopping block. Research is not looked up favorably by this bunch, or their followers.

I don't feel we need to put to much emphasis on smart 60mm mortar rounds this is a relatively short range weapon that in the hands of well trained mortarmen can be used quite surgically. Doug is right we don't need to reduce the charge in these weapons to make room for guidance packages. Isn't a ten dollar round that be bought in volume better then a round that may cost hundreds or thousands of dollars. I know all we cared about was having enough ammo, accuracy was something we shot for, so to speak, because it was in our own best interest. Let's use technology where it's appropriate.

Wow Ageof you wasted me. I can't go on. I'm so reassured though that your not a liberal. Yeah right. I'm done as well.

It seems liberal thought doesn't allow for good comprehension. Gannok there was no mention by me that Fox is or isn't spreading a political message.
As for subliminal messages in children's programming; they shouldn't be there. If this sort of thing doesn't bother you then you weren't paying attention in history classes. I'm not interested in debating whether a child is affected by propaganda. It should not be in children's programing ever under any circumstances. They're kids let they stay kids as long as possible.

Ageof it sounds like your age has affected your reason. Just because you don't agree with Fox does not make their message propaganda. But, sticking political messages in children's programing in propaganda.
Your silly attempt to change my statement will not fool anyone who hasn't long ago stopped asking questions and or listening to more then one point of view.
Your beef with Fox is bogus. The news shows on Fox are far more moderate then most other news broadcasts. As for commentary shows like Glenn Beck or Hannity there's a simply answer for people like you that only want to have your beliefs validated. You can turn to that bastion of fair and balanced news CNBC.

If this kind of thing happened during a conservative administration the media would howl. The only thing these educational programs and schools need to be teaching children beyond the three R's is a love of country.
Why is public television trying to persuade children about matters that are not for children. There's a word for this: Propaganda.