I'd just like to say well done to Corsham for putting himself in the firing line and having to be subjected to what must be a quite stressful and intimidating situation / interrogation from the police for his 'views' and his freedom of expression.

In such cases it is pretty much "one isolated man against the entire apparatus of the state" - and can therefore seem to be a giant wave that could crash down on your head and send you under.

As such, I am also glad to see that it appears he has kept things right on the fringes of perceived acceptability and has not been goaded into overstepping the mark where they will take action, and has thus not (yet) been carted off to the cells!

I have to be honest and wonder whether I could have managed deal with such a situation without either (A) toeing the line to avoid myself further trouble, or (B) going too far off the deep end and (ironically) being arrested in the due course of reporting a racist crime! Getting it right down the middle must be a bit of a skill!

However, this apparent 'other' case of somebody crumbling over questioning of their self identity by some jobs agency jobsworth is another level altogether. Unless there are factors I am unaware of, it surely takes very little to stand your ground in those kinds of situations.....especially as the category was added for this very purpose.

Well, it is no real shocker really. Perhaps the media are 'softening up' the 'inevitability' of total white minority coming.

It is said that all empires eventually crash and burn out, not always through being trampled over, but through acts of great self inflicted folly. Of course, it is not entirely self inflicted in our cases, but many people have been extremely foolish for allowing it to take place - and even joining the "celebration".

It certainly is the case with our Empire crashing and burning, and when we lost our world leading dominance to the United States after the second world war and they became the global super-power, it seems they are on their way out before long. They will not be able to sustain America as we all knew it, with a black and Mexican majority. The evidence is already there to be seen in various pockets of the place, so why do they expect anything different as a whole?

I have a number of articles from the media that explain these kinds of trends as "increased diversity". By "more diverse" they of course mean "Less White". I would be curious to know as to whether the BBC and many other 'liberals' would have the same attitude or tone if we were to congratulate (and present the idea of it being) a new era because this country was becoming "Less Black", or if millions of whites, Chinese and Japanese were outstripping Africans in Africa and "increasing diversity" there.....

Where America usually trends, we generally follow. In fact, I think there is only about 15 years or so between us on this particular matter of birth tipping points, and we generally share the same final "bowing out" end of shelf-life.

I cannot see the descendants of the founding Americans doing much about it, just like the self mutilating/self harming British public. There has to be a will before there is a way, and unfortunately too many have not got the will to survive. In fact, many do not even seem to see themselves "as a people" at all, just "individuals".

I wish I could be a little more cheery, but with these kinds of situations developing before our eyes, there is not really much to cheer about.

In fact, saying that though,sometimes you have little option but to laugh about the insanity of the modern world otherwise you'd cry. For example, on the Radio2 Jeremy Vine show the other day, I think it was Tuesday or Wednesday, there was a debate/topical discussion about "Is your dog a racist?".

Yes, apparently, many dogs apparently do not seem to like Afro-Caribbean people or Asians and they bark and snarl whenever one comes near. I am not a dog owner, but it is something that most people know to be true and not just a 'one off' situation. There is a trend.

Anyway, they had a specialist dog psychiatrist type of person in the studio answering peoples calls about their "prejudiced pets" and what to do if their dogs were "racist".

We even had the clichés of "contact theory" applied to dogs just the same as it is theorised for whites - where they need to become "accustomed" to black and brown faces and the more there are them around, the more relaxed the dog will be as it becomes familiar.

The dog specialist at one point said, off the cuff, that "we are very fortunate to have lots of wonderful diverse people in Britain {so it may help to gain their pets experience}."...... Not to play on the pun too much, but it was a "Pavlovian Dog" response that is stereotypical of the attitude of most whites in this society. The opposition really have deeply engrained this attitude and viewpoint.

So, whilst the country goes to hell - and like America, whites dwindle quietly into minorities - we are discussing solving the problem of "racist pets" and "prejudiced pets" (as disabled people, 'LGBT', special-needs and others were also included as victims of dog 'prejudice').

As I say, you have to laugh at the sheer absurdity or you'd cry.

Cheers John.

It seems that much of our sense of self and community has been broken apart, in many different ways. In my experience and in my own ways, I too am a victim of that culture that has arisen. Isolated, not really interested in neighbours too much or bothered about community events, sat in houses on the computer (or in some cases games consoles), plugged into the goggle-box, generally uncaring and blotting the world and everybody else out.

As you point out, it is not quite dead yet. In a microcosm, without wishing to sound too depressive, I sometimes wonder whether the indigenous society will suddenly "find" that old community spirit again when various towns like mine and even cities become minority indigenous. For example, it is tempting to give another white person a 'knowing nod' down in my local shopping centre, because it is gratifying to find 'another' real British northerner in there sometimes!

When a community is small, and against the odds, maybe a collective self protection and advancement gene will kick in to action....but unfortunately that may be a bit late!

You're right though, like that horrific tale you cite in your reply, or in cases like those floods we had a few years ago, or whatever, there is often still a bit of community spirit about under the surface.

Maybe the problem for us at the moment is, aside from the things I already cite, we do not really know the minds of our own people any more. We keep ourselves quiet, keep off certain subjects, for we do not know our own societies that much any more and we tend to guess what they make of it all.

I suppose that I, like many others, would rather we did not have to face starvation and crippling situations for something to 'finally happen', and nor do I really wish for massive violence and bloodshed which some perhaps see as the end result of such a crash (but believe it will 'sort out' some of our problems as people turn on each other or flee). It is not a merry prospect to cling to for some kind of 'salvation' of the country.

I suppose I would rather we found as many other ways as possible before then, rather than rely on such a situation to unfold.

There is still a little something left in this nations reserve, and like many other times in our history, we just about manage to scrape through with a miracle or an unexpected turn of events. Let's hope we get another one.

Lol @ Manchurian - I did spot that the other night, but after typing so much pithy commentary I forgot to casually mention it.

It always makes me laugh when that film comes on the TV about that programmed President candidate, The Manchurian Candidate, then mentally swapping it to being The Mancunian Candidate.

"Eeeer, ye'arrrraaaight arrrrrr-kid, givus yer vote eh, top one, bangin', sorted, yeah nice one, you're not twistin' mi melon man...."

Of course I understand. I am just pointing out that people have been mouthing this mantra of 'worse is better' for 40 years - saying that whatever bad situations they see happening in our country, it is somehow "for the best" as it will make people wake up. I think it is completely absurd, and that it does not stack up to scrutiny so far. That is what I am saying.

A complete financial collapse and near starvation is obviously an entirely different situation - but as I say, even THEN I am not sure we can be 100% certain just how people will react. People here seem to assume what will happen - we cannot afford to assume, we need to "work" society to make ourselves the champions of our people with our answers and solutions, ideally BEFORE such a collapse ever happens, not during the chaos.

We are obviously NOT doing that anywhere near properly.

(Cont'd.)

How about in the north, like Blackburn or my own town, 33% Asian already. Is there any sign of "worse is better" bearing fruit in any of these places or nationwide? Of course not. People don't seem to give a 'collective' rats ass. Besides, even if they did, where would they go to and what would they do even if they stepped out their back doors? Nobody knows, so nobody does anything.

But forgive me when I think they are not quietly sharpening their pitchforks for a revolution. They are more likely to be buying baby bouncers from conglomerate corporations like ToysRUs on a Sunday afternoon for their ethnic minority offspring to bounce in before they sit and watch "Braindead-Factor-Strictly-Mind-Rot-On-Ice-With-The Stars" and then employ a Malayan illegal immigrant nanny to babysit for an evening so they then head off for a curry down the local Curry house, one that is probably collecting tips for funds for building the new mosque (or temple), as their existing one is now too small to cope with demand.

I sometimes don't think even a Greece-style disaster will make British people act in ways we expect. They would probably vote in the bloody Communist Party and link arms with Sanjay, Ishtak and Leroy to sing a collective kumbayah to pull through the hard times together.

If anyone wants a look at my old documentary, there is over and hour and half of material of "current affairs" that when put together should 'wake people up' ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFCHeJEBZHo ....but in answer to my own questions about it doing that, no, I do not think it would.

Nobody has the staying capacity to even watch it through start to finish. Even 20 minutes would be too long for the feeble attention spans of a goldfish population. "What rape cases? What riots? - Oh those ones?! They were last week! It is old news! I can't even remember them now!, I've been off my skull drunk and watched some TV since then, yeah, it was bad news, but hey, never mind eh!".....

I do not know what the hell we are going to do....but churning out case after case of our downfall is certainly demoralising and depressing.

My reply here is depressing, something I vowed I would try and snap out of on my very own site! But I think CC and GA are currently blowing off a few steam valves, so what the hell, might as well join in and get it over with for a while!

I don't know how to do it, or what to do (other than what I have suggested in various articles of mine, and even those are high hopes and a wing on a prayer) but nationalists definitely have to break out of this repetitive cycle of reaction. Not only can it make you ill, but it surely cannot be helping that much either.

I have recently been trying to get my nationalist affairs in order, to tidy them up and maybe package them away. It is a long and laborious affair and I have hardly made a dent.

It is all the material I have accumulated in the last five years or so, from when I became a bit of a kleptomaniac for web pages, videos, images, audio interviews, etc.

This kleptomania had arisen because I was sick and tired of having to re-look for things I had once seen somewhere - and sick and tired of hiving away reams of bookmarks only to find newspaper articles had been pulled, changed, or even in some cases the whole site where it had come from was closed.

Whilst I had collected a lot of web pages (and still do, to a lesser degree) it had long dawned on me that it was pretty much futile as nothing on a daily level (or weekly level) seems to wake or stir people up from their comatose state.

For example, I have not anywhere near finished categorising and sorting things out, but I have already sorted out:

....Over 485 "crime" and "fraud" orientated stories, 300 "demographic" related pieces, 310 "anti-white" related incidents ("woman too pale for job" - "man fined for flying flag"- "£50,00 for Asian women football team" style stuff)......

I have done over 200 entries in my general "civilisation collapse" folder ("navy would struggle to fight a war" - "make sharia part of UK law says Judge" - "Britain is cocaine user capital of Europe" - "Britain has fewer hospital beds that Lithuania and Hungary" - "English spelling 'too difficult' for children" type stuff)......

I have about about 100 "health" related matters etc, and no doubt many more categories to come.

Okay, in all categories there are a lot of repeat things to be found, like 1 in 5 people are this, then a few years later 1 in 4 people are that, umpteen TB ones, occasional different versions of the same news report, etc. But they are in the papers, all of them, day after day, year after year.

I even have about 58 "You could not make it up" ones filed at the moment -

Prime examples from that category so far include "prison wardens told to wear slippers so not to wake up psycho killers", "Rwandan genocide suspect found working in Essex care home", and how a "Worker referring to gossip as jungle drums sparked six-month racism probe".....Really, you could NOT make some of those up.

Every single day of the week there are stabbings, shootings, rapes, murders, frauds, more immigration, more piss-takes, it goes on, and on, and on..... and like G.A says, people, grown men are sat CRYING over a bloody football match where 22 Millionaires (no doubt mostly foreigners) are probably playing each other for foreign owned teams in foreign owned stadiums.

It can only be a psychosis. It can only be some kind of mental illness or conditioned coma, surely.

People also keep on with this tired nationalist mantra "worse is better". Utter rubbish so far. Worse is only worse. People have been saying that phrase since the 1970's. "Never-mind eh, worse is better, it will get that bad they will see the truth"....

Yeah, well how well is that working out so far?!!

We have essentially lost three cities to other peoples, we are being shot, stabbed, our children raped, we are being crammed in like sardines in a tin, forking out 40% more for food, petrol, energy, there are millions and millions of new houses to be built, new cities in fact, to house immigrants and their descendants, we have been bombed (if you believe that version of events), pretty much dismantled by the EU, it appears we have lost all control of our borders, we have seen various riots, both race riots and "social decay" riots setting London ablaze....

I mean, bloody hell fire, just HOW bad does it have to get in order to get "better"?

What did the people of various parts of London do when things got bad? They moved away - well, the ones with ability and who were 'that way out' did. Worse was not better for them, and hey, when it got worse, they understandably left. As would I.

What did the people of parts of Birmingham do when things got bad? They moved away too.

When was "worse is better" going to kick start something there then? Why didn't the collective whites "kick off" about the loss of Wembley or Dagenham/Barking? Because it just does not happen like that, that's why.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/9261...

[flippant mode / on]

See - it is not a race issue. People said it was a race issue because they all tended to be Pakistanis - but as can be seen in the last few years, it is a 'diverse situation', with Afghanis, Bangladeshi's, and now potentially Afro-Caribbeans etc too!!!

It doesn't matter that they are all non-white and all the victims are whites - it is just "diverse" and in "all groups" (except, that is, for whites, as a general rule).

See, "diversity" can be a great thing - it means we can be took the piss out of by LOTS of different non-white groups, and that we can have our paedophile rape statistics spiced up from that tired 'male pale and stale' situation of the occasional dirty mac (or dodgy vicar or uncle) we used to have.

How boring was it before?! Now it is much more varied and exciting!!!

Entrepreneurial immigrants and descendants have managed to create a niche industry that probably makes lots of money for their local economies. What used to be a rare and solitary affair business model has now been expanded and put up on an "industrial scale" level. Surely we must be grateful?

We are so lucky to have these issues now. It adds 'dynamism' and 'vibrancy' to the political and societal discourse.

It is a bit like when we were told a few years ago not to worry about Birmingham soon being minority white, because it was not a case of one race replacing another race and being dominant, but that it was a "diverse group" of Pakistanis, Afghanis, Bangladeshi's, Indians, Afro Carribeans, Africans, Chinese, and various others - and hell, the 'whites' will still be the "biggest minority group" !

Well, that makes it okay then! What the hell are we worried about?!

[flippant mode /off]

Who are they trying to kid?

I agree that we ideally need somebody to try and collectivise the nationalist scene, somebody who can stand up for our most trickiest of standpoints - or can at least navigate or express them pretty well - and a kind of figurehead to provide a bit of focus and direction when it comes to what we really need to be doing.....

.......but I get the impression that some people here (and elsewhere) are maybe thinking on a much (much) more 'heavyweight' scale when it comes to what they see as 'leadership', a desired leadership figure of quite intense magnitude and an unquestionable support of what some might call the 'Führerprinzip' model of doing things.

They might desire the notoriety, the hard-lines, the regimentation, the almost unquestioning loyalty, that whole 'leadership' model that goes a step beyond that of what we have seen for the last 70 to 80 years.

That may be unfair of me, but it is hard for me to know what *exactly* people have in mind and how far they are prepared to go down those lines. People differ in opinions.

I am not really swayed to that kind of thing, and in a moment I might write something laying out why.

However, I have no "strong" views on the matter enough to fall out or whatever. If I can be convinced of the merits of doing it another way, then fair enough, I could change my mind. I am not always that rigid on things like that.

I may try and explain my thought processes shortly, and if they are not agreed with or are not seen to make any sense, then that is fine too. We can't all agree on everything.

It is only through exploring things out and by putting over our thoughts that we can learn other points of views. I may not change my mind over it, but I may come to see it another way or see a 'third way' that balances the two, or whatever.

I am not so sure that clamouring for a 'strong leader' is really all that good a notion for us to keep clinging on to.

Although it is tempting to have some mega-leader to 'back' and even perhaps 'look up to' etc, there are many downsides to this, including a reliance on one person to rescue us and in terms of organisation, where there may be some merit in a more 'leaderless resistance' structure so that we have nobody to be attacked, or turned, or to become demoralised over to the point we are collapsing.

When one person essentially 'becomes' the movement, it is pretty dangerous - as we all know from recent experience.

Sure, we may need a decent 'figurehead' (or two) as a sort of recognised focal point, but a 'leader' figure, in the way many people seem to want (are they picturing a Hitler, Mussolini, Mosley, type figure?) I am not so sure. They are very few and far between, in fact nigh on impossible to find anyway.

Perhaps the real hero's need to be ourselves and how we help build a better movement - and generally by pulling our socks up to be a bit more fit for purpose in society and in terms of figuring out how best to achieve our goals. A 'strong leader' can only work with the troops he is given, after all.