IntenseDebate

14 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Top Obama aide fires p... · 0 replies · +2 points

It's the Tea Partiers fault. If we would just use a tire gauge, billions of dollars would be saved.

14 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Top Obama aide fires p... · 0 replies · +4 points

But you have to understand that if it wasn't for the tsunami in Japan the economy would be roaring ahead. And Mr. President, unexpected events *always* happen. Except no one else makes excuses.

14 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Top Obama aide fires p... · 0 replies · +4 points

What happened to Obama's purple rhetoric about listening to all ideas, and complimenting success regardless of someone's political affiliation?

15 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - Before the Obama Justi... · 0 replies · +13 points

The reason why Obama's not commenting is because *now* he says he doesn't have all the facts, and so he doesn't want to jump to conclusions. Another teaching moment brought to you by our Dear Leader.

16 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Obama fires back at po... · 0 replies · +7 points

Poll question was phrased very poorly. If I was polled, this conservative would have definitely answered "Yes", Obama will bring change to America. Not a good change mind you, but change nonetheless. Change diapers, not America!

16 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Palin says Obama\'s he... · 0 replies · +1 points

Those enraged individuals who say, "That's not in the bill! That's not in the bill" let me grant your argument for the time being. Your displeasure with Sarah Palin's comments indicates that you actually partly agree with her.

Like many who blew gaskets when defending Obama against claims that he supported infanticide, you seem to be saying hey, *IF* Sarah Palin's description of the health care bill is accurate and/or *IF* pro-lifers characterizations of Obama supporting infanticide are accurate, then outrage would indeed be justified.

*IF* the proposed health care bill is based on subjective judgment of an individual's 'level of productivity in society,' and parents, or a baby with Down Syndrome would have to stand in front of a 'death panel' of bureaucrats, that policy would indeed be evil. Likewise, *IF* Obama did support a policy and/or law that supported infanticide, that policy, law, and individual who supported such would indeed be evil.

17 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Pelosi: Nothing more t... · 0 replies · +3 points

LOL! That's funny!

17 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Pelosi: Nothing more t... · 0 replies · 0 points

Someone keeps removing my reply. Why! What I said was the truth. Here it is again:

Obama is not a good man. Anyone who supports infanticide is not good. Even NARAL and a unanimous Senate recognized this as pure evil.

17 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Pelosi: Nothing more t... · 0 replies · 0 points

Obama is not a good man. A good man does not support infanticide. Even NARAL and a unanimous Senate didn't go this far and saw this as pure evil.

17 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Pelosi: Nothing more t... · 0 replies · 0 points

Obama is not a good man. A good man does not support infanticide.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with Botox

People I'm following

Botox